Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 17, 2021 Posted September 17, 2021 another opener wud be shaw or devdutt
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 17, 2021 Author Posted September 17, 2021 Why are ppl leaking all this stuff from BCCI ?? Same happened during Ganguly-chappell Saga
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 17, 2021 Author Posted September 17, 2021 mods shift this to Cricket talk
Suhaan Posted September 17, 2021 Posted September 17, 2021 Abe hatana hai toh aise hi hata do,ye tamasha kyu karna
neel roy Posted September 17, 2021 Posted September 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: another opener wud be shaw or devdutt Shaw. He blasted off in VH
Vk1 Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 Dhawan had already played two world cups and he would not meet the expectations for 2023 anyways so selectors were right. Dont go by Dhawans average.. 45 right now is like 37 in 2000s.. express bowling 1
jf1gp_1 Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 what's the problem if Virat wanted Dhawan ? Khota 1
ShoonyaSifar Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 29 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said: what's the problem if Virat wanted Dhawan ? Selectors could see that going into a home world cup with the top 3 aged 38, 36 and 35 could be a problem. So the eldest out of the three has to be moved out and a ykung player who had done so well in VH Trophy had to be given chance But for Kohli, friendships matter more than the team's interests. Hell Raiser and nevada 2
jf1gp_1 Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 32 minutes ago, ShoonyaSifar said: Selectors could see that going into a home world cup with the top 3 aged 38, 36 and 35 could be a problem. So the eldest out of the three has to be moved out and a ykung player who had done so well in VH Trophy had to be given chance But for Kohli, friendships matter more than the team's interests. Let Virat request for Akshay Kumar in the squad its selectors job to select 15 members which aligns with teams goal and vision. If they didnt think Dhawan fit in the vision they have every right to overrule Kohli. I blame selectors for giving in and not Kohli. What would have kohli requested, i want an attacking left handed opener, i want dhawan. Selectors could have easily selected padikkal beetle and raki05 2
AuxiliA Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 BCCI has already brought Kohli back to ground. Selecting 6 MI players but only 1 from RCB(Kohli himself), Kohli giving up T20 capt). Welcome Change for both India and Kohli. nevada, express bowling, Vk1 and 1 other 4
Adamant Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 18 minutes ago, AuxiliA said: BCCI has already brought Kohli back to ground. Selecting 6 MI players but only 1 from RCB(Kohli himself), Kohli giving up T20 capt). Welcome Change for both India and Kohli. So Dhawan's selection is on Kohli but the 6 MI players are picked by selectors.? Choose one side: Either Kohli has a say in selection or he does not. Khota 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 18, 2021 Author Posted September 18, 2021 (edited) del Edited September 18, 2021 by Ankit_sharma03
Khota Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 I totally respect Kohli forths. Yo need to reward thebest player
New guy Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 4 hours ago, Adamant said: So Dhawan's selection is on Kohli but the 6 MI players are picked by selectors.? Choose one side: Either Kohli has a say in selection or he does not. Yes Because he had unconditional power then and no one could over rule him then. Now BCCI had enough and put their foot down after thw WTC final. If you remember the first signs of this were when Kohlis demand to send Shaw and Padikkal were rejected by BCCI https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mensxp.com/amp/sports/cricket/90134-selectors-hailed-for-showing-spine-to-kohli-shastri.html I dont see how this is difficult to follow. Kohli had unconditional power once and did use them to select his favorites, with lack of results, those powers have finally beem clipped
speedheat Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 This is precisely why I believe he should be stripped of his captaincy in odis too. He'll never consider developing youngsters instead, he'll stick to his eggsperience bullshit. nevada 1
Adamant Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, New guy said: Yes Because he had unconditional power then and no one could over rule him then. Now BCCI had enough and put their foot down after thw WTC final. If you remember the first signs of this were when Kohlis demand to send Shaw and Padikkal were rejected by BCCI https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mensxp.com/amp/sports/cricket/90134-selectors-hailed-for-showing-spine-to-kohli-shastri.html I dont see how this is difficult to follow. Kohli had unconditional power once and did use them to select his favorites, with lack of results, those powers have finally beem clipped So Kohli was powerful in March but not in July. Lol Now you will come up with something to justify this also. If you want to play this game of microanalysing and applying filters without a shred of proof then I can also do the same. Selection committee selects players keeping Captain in confidence, if Chahal has been dropped that means Kohli was ok with that, same goes with selection of 6 MI players. Also you missed the whole point, posters here are saying that RCB player's like Siraj not being selected shows Kohli's demands haven't been met, now these are the same people who say Kohli has no hand in selecting Siraj in tests. Hypocrisy at it's best. Edited September 18, 2021 by Adamant
ShoonyaSifar Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 Kohli PR clutching at the straws now. Poor souls were arrogantly going around saying they will teach everyone a lesson when Kohli was 40* in WTC (imagine the desperation). How things have turned upside down for them within a few weeks Adamant 1
New guy Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Adamant said: So Kohli was powerful in March but not in July. Lol Now you will come up with something to justify this also. If you want to play this game of microanalysing and applying filters without a shred of proof then I can also do the same. Selection committee selects players keeping Captain in confidence, if Chahal has been dropped that means Kohli was ok with that, same goes with selection of 6 MI players. Also you missed the whole point, posters here are saying that RCB player's like Siraj not being selected shows Kohli's demands haven't been met, now these are the same people who say Kohli has no hand in selecting Siraj in tests. Hypocrisy at it's best. Kohli was definitely powerful till march. He is the biggest brand in indian cricket and took advantage of it. But there is a point in every powerful players career when he will lose power. Happened to dhoni too, he was untouchable till finally his form and final failures took a toll on him and he was sidelined. WTC final was the turning point for Kohlis power As for siraj, if there is one thing kohli plays no politics in, its fast bowling. He knows thats his USP and reason he wins tests. So fast bowling choice is completely non biased and kohli played a huge part in selecting Siraj However when it comes to batsmen and spinners, he definitely has his bias and also rewards his cronies. Edited September 18, 2021 by New guy
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now