Can we have Pandya, Thakur, Jadeja and Sundar?

[Serpico]

At 6, 7, 8 and 9 in odi line-up? It can rival England in bat-deep 

 

The two fast bowlers in this scenario must be really good and in good form, ofcourse. An in-form Bumrah and Prasidh/Umran/Tyagi 

[Serpico]

They can also play only one of rahul/pant and push sundar to 5 if they want a third fast bowler in any match 

[Frustrated]

Age has caught up with jaddu.  Can't play more than 2 successive games in any format without getting niggled.... Has been the case in last 3 years (post WC2019).  

[vvvslaxman]

If that is the way they go they have to be strategically very good. Even with average bowling line up with better strategies you can counter any batting force.

[express bowling]

 Batting till 8 should be good enough if we choose good batters.

 

The bowling would be too weak with 4 all-rounders.

 

6. Hardik

7. Washington

8. Jadeja

9. Bumrah

10. Siraj / Prasidh 

11. Umran  / Sen / Tyagi

 

Jadeja at 8 would really improve the lower order batting anyway and add depth.

[Sandeep99]

I feel Deepak Chahar is a better batsman than Shardul Thakur.. he needs to be developed..

[nitinbwj]

Thakur has regressed.

[Frustrated]

27 minutes ago, Sandeep99 said:

I feel Deepak Chahar is a better batsman than Shardul Thakur.. he needs to be developed..

No.     He is an injury master.       Remains injured for several months after bowling 3 overs of harmless pies in a game.  Proved it today as well.      PS: He can be a very good model/actor in bollywood movies or tv serials. Looks decent.  

Edited December 7, 2022 by Frustrated

[singhvivek141]

5 hours ago, Serpico said:

At 6, 7, 8 and 9 in odi line-up? It can rival England in bat-deep 

 

The two fast bowlers in this scenario must be really good and in good form, ofcourse. An in-form Bumrah and Prasidh/Umran/Tyagi 

Bowling will be light weight...
None of these 4 can bowl in death or useful with new ball..which means the two pacers need to not only bowl with new ball but also do the heavy lifting at death.

We need another bowler at 9 who can manage death overs or new ball. 
 

[nitinbwj]

4 hours ago, Sandeep99 said:

I feel Deepak Chahar is a better batsman than Shardul Thakur.. he needs to be developed..

 He proved us wrong. He is worst. 

[Lord]

6 hours ago, express bowling said:

 Batting till 8 should be good enough if we choose good batters.

 

The bowling would be too weak with 4 all-rounders.

 

6. Hardik

7. Washington

8. Jadeja

9. Bumrah

10. Siraj / Prasidh 

11. Umran  / Sen / Tyagi

 

Jadeja at 8 would really improve the lower order batting anyway and add depth.

 

Sundar belongs to top 5 or else no. 8 or below to hold an end. Doesnt have power required for 6-7

[Clarke]

4 hours ago, Sandeep99 said:

I feel Deepak Chahar is a better batsman than Shardul Thakur.. he needs to be developed..

 

he needs to be developed as a 2 over specialist since 3 was too demanding on him today

[express bowling]

1 hour ago, Lord said:

 

Sundar belongs to top 5 or else no. 8 or below to hold an end. Doesnt have power required for 6-7

 

Washington looked very good in NZ at 7

 

Used power as well as improvisation.

[Lord]

2 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Washington looked very good in NZ at 7

 

Used power as well as improvisation.

 

Small grounds. Don't need much power there.

 

Will mostly not work anywhere else.

[express bowling]

1 hour ago, Lord said:

 

Small grounds. Don't need much power there.

 

Will mostly not work anywhere else.

 

His power game has definitely improved. 

[The Realist]

Jaydev Unadkat? 

 

Developed his batting skills alongside fearsome bowling. The all-round package.

[Number]

Thakur needs to show more application for the ability he has with the bat. He batted like a genuine no. XI this series. 

[Vijy]

Have sundar at 5, Pandu at 6, fast scorer like SKY at 7 (who can come in at over 35-37 and play like T20), we don't have good no. 8 at the moment. do not trust jaddu in that position as batter.