Austin 3:!6 Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 Looks like the ball was grassed. Benefit of doubt should have been given to batsman. Unlucky Gill?
Vijy Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 9 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Looks like the ball was grassed. Benefit of doubt should have been given to batsman. Unlucky Gill? not really unlucky. he flashes at most balls outside off, so would have gotten out soon enough.
Norman Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 I'm afraid everyone's going to focus on this decision and blame the third umpire for our inevitable defeat while all the leaches in the team management go away scot free. Rohit should immediately double Green's MI contract for saving his sorry arse.. There was nothing wrong with the catch. He had full control on the ball all the way through.
Vijy Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 Just now, Norman said: I'm afraid everyone's going to focus on this decision and blame the third umpire for our inevitable defeat while all the leaches in the team management go away scot free. Rohit should immediately double Green's MI contract for saving his sorry arse.. There was nothing wrong with the catch. He had full control on the ball all the way through. yes, they will use this noise as distraction
Austin 3:!6 Posted June 10, 2023 Author Posted June 10, 2023 The back angle of Cameron Green's catch. pic.twitter.com/vEaBvrF3OV— Mufaddal Vohra (@mufaddal_vohra) June 10, 2023
Austin 3:!6 Posted June 10, 2023 Author Posted June 10, 2023 Unlucky Shubman Gill. It should've been Not Out. pic.twitter.com/CSxFzB1xc0— Mufaddal Vohra (@mufaddal_vohra) June 10, 2023 coffee_rules 1
Vijy Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 Just now, Austin 3:!6 said: Unlucky Shubman Gill. It should've been Not Out. pic.twitter.com/CSxFzB1xc0 — Mufaddal Vohra (@mufaddal_vohra) June 10, 2023 was bound to nick one outside off soon enough. he was the one who went flashing at that ball. hard hands, no footwork, no decision making, etc
coffee_rules Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 1 minute ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Was there a stupid soft signal?
coffee_rules Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 Just now, Vijy said: was bound to nick one outside off soon enough. he was the one who went flashing at that ball. hard hands, no footwork, no decision making, etc He always played like that. No footwork depending on youthful reflexes and hand-eye coordination Vijy 1
Vickydev Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Said it at the time.. Sham of a decision
Vijy Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 Just now, coffee_rules said: He always played like that. No footwork depending on youthful reflexes and hand-eye coordination yes, exactly. should play in MO, and ideally not in test team at all. Everyone knows I have been plenty critical of Brat over the years, but he was scoring much more than Gill by this time of his test career despite, IMO, not having as much "talent" (however one defines it) as Gill at the same age coffee_rules 1
zen Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 As long as fingers are underneath the ball (some part of the ball can touch the turf b/w the fingers), it is out. Vijy 1
vice Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 (edited) Too much ambiguity in the current rules, gets subjective based on the umpire's interpretation. They need to change the rules to if any part of the ball touches the ground, it's not out. Edited June 10, 2023 by vice Vijy 1
Nikola Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 It is in his hands but touching grass too. What does rules say?
Lord Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 52 minutes ago, Vijy said: yes, exactly. should play in MO, and ideally not in test team at all. Everyone knows I have been plenty critical of Brat over the years, but he was scoring much more than Gill by this time of his test career despite, IMO, not having as much "talent" (however one defines it) as Gill at the same age huh? Kohli only debuted at this age in Tests
Lord Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 43 minutes ago, zen said: As long as fingers are underneath the ball (some part of the ball can touch the turf b/w the fingers), it is out. is that in rulebooks?
kosingh Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 17 minutes ago, Lord said: is that in rulebooks? 33.2.2.1 the ball is held in the hand or hands of a fielder, even if the hand holding the ball is touching the ground, or is hugged to the body, or lodges in the external protective equipment worn by a fielder, or lodges accidentally in a fielder’s clothing.
Lord Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 Just now, kosingh said: 33.2.2.1 the ball is held in the hand or hands of a fielder, even if the hand holding the ball is touching the ground, or is hugged to the body, or lodges in the external protective equipment worn by a fielder, or lodges accidentally in a fielder’s clothing. nothing there says ball can touch the ground between the fingers
DeepSpace Posted June 10, 2023 Posted June 10, 2023 Does not matter one bit. Desis love India Pee Loda! Frustrated 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now