rangeelaraja Posted March 10 Posted March 10 27 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said: Both of us are entitled to 1 % of that for managing and navigating the intangibles that could have prevented the team from progressing let alone winning.
G_B_ Posted March 10 Posted March 10 Tmc mp kirti azad will claim minorities should be paid more.. Manucrick, Ravi_Shastri and Laaloo 1 2
New guy Posted March 10 Posted March 10 29 minutes ago, rangeelaraja said: Both of us are entitled to 1 % of that for managing and navigating the intangibles that could have prevented the team from progressing let alone winning. Werent you the one who wanted youngsters like Abhishek dropped and wanted kohli back? If india has followed your advice..
G_B_ Posted March 10 Posted March 10 18 minutes ago, New guy said: Werent you the one who wanted youngsters like Abhishek dropped and wanted kohli back? If india has followed your advice.. Werent you the one saying finals should not be played at Modi stadium? If India had followed your advise... FischerTal, Ravi_Shastri, Laaloo and 1 other 4
IndianRenegade Posted March 10 Author Posted March 10 6 hours ago, rangeelaraja said: Both of us are entitled to 1 % of that for managing and navigating the intangibles that could have prevented the team from progressing let alone winning. What is the procedure to apply for it?
Gollum Posted March 10 Posted March 10 51 cr to women, 131 to men. Not fair. Besides ODI WC is bigger, women should have been treated fairly.
LordPrabhzy Posted March 10 Posted March 10 3 minutes ago, Gollum said: 51 cr to women, 131 to men. Not fair. Besides ODI WC is bigger, women should have been treated fairly. No its enough- dont let get more money get to their heads. We saw they were brought back down to earth in Aus tour. 51 crore is still A LOT
Gollum Posted March 10 Posted March 10 2 minutes ago, LordPrabhzy said: No its enough- dont let get more money get to their heads. We saw they were brought back down to earth in Aus tour. 51 crore is still A LOT Then men should get less than or equal to 51. Women did better than expected in Aus. Remember what happened to Eng ladies in last Ashes. This Aus women's team is the greatest force this sport has ever seen, they make GOAT WI/Aus men teams look like teletubbies when it comes to how far they are ahead of their peers.
coffee_rules Posted March 10 Posted March 10 I wish they had announced 50 lakh of Pakistani rupees to each Pakistani players to compensate for the fine that PCB has imposed on those players as well. It could’ve been a good. Gesture in this auspicious month of Roza.. jeet ki khushi mein khairat bantne ka mahaul to banta hain!! BacktoCricaddict 1
coffee_rules Posted March 10 Posted March 10 5 hours ago, Ravi_Shastri said: Thats a biggie And a quickie too, I mean, they gave it in such a quick time,kya! Ravi_Shastri 1
FischerTal Posted March 10 Posted March 10 42 minutes ago, Gollum said: 51 cr to women, 131 to men. Not fair. Besides ODI WC is bigger, women should have been treated fairly. Tbh women’s cricket is quite boring. It will never reach the viewership of men’s cricket. This is the harsh truth bouncers, Ravi_Shastri and Lord 1 2
rollingstoned Posted March 10 Posted March 10 37 minutes ago, Gollum said: Then men should get less than or equal to 51. Women did better than expected in Aus. Remember what happened to Eng ladies in last Ashes. This Aus women's team is the greatest force this sport has ever seen, they make GOAT WI/Aus men teams look like teletubbies when it comes to how far they are ahead of their peers. Yea because women's cricket is just a sbig a draw as mens cricket.
Gollum Posted March 10 Posted March 10 11 minutes ago, rollingstoned said: Yea because women's cricket is just a sbig a draw as mens cricket. They already make way less in terms of annual contracts. Here their achievement is more significant. And not like BCCI is a bankrupt board. Nobody cares about how big a draw something is, when it comes to winning trophies/medals in WCs/Olympics.
Gollum Posted March 10 Posted March 10 If both men and women win gold in LA Olympics, will they get equal cash prize from BCCI or not? No need to defend the indefensible.
Gollum Posted March 10 Posted March 10 18 minutes ago, FischerTal said: Tbh women’s cricket is quite boring. It will never reach the viewership of men’s cricket. This is the harsh truth Haan but that is reflected in annual contracts, IPL salaries etc. Last season ke BCCI annual contracts dekh lo, men's grade A was ₹7 cr. For garde C, ₹1 cr. Women's grade A was ₹50 lakhs, grade C ₹ 10 lakhs.
rollingstoned Posted March 10 Posted March 10 44 minutes ago, Gollum said: They already make way less in terms of annual contracts. Here their achievement is more significant. And not like BCCI is a bankrupt board. Nobody cares about how big a draw something is, when it comes to winning trophies/medals in WCs/Olympics. They make less because they make less money by being a lesser draw and the field in men's cricket is also superior. Just because they are both WCs doesn't make th achievement the same. Not all olympic medals are the same anyway, you yourself said it on the othe thread. Decathletes for eg do far more work but get less recognition and commercial rewards than the 100 and 200m sprinter. Not necessarily unfair that that is the case when you understand why it is so. bouncers 1
New guy Posted March 10 Posted March 10 7 hours ago, G_B_ said: Werent you the one saying finals should not be played at Modi stadium? If India had followed your advise... Difference is, india would have won anywhere even if they followed my advice, heck they even won in the panauti stadium However, india would not have won if they had followed his advice Nice try, but see the difference?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now