Jump to content

How come Virat's 100 gets him a MOM award eventhough his team lost, while Smith's 100 doesn't get him MOM.


Recommended Posts

Posted

You do realise that its not the same person who picks MoM for every match and opinions might vary?

17 minutes ago, RedFever said:

Is there no limit on the length of the title.

This guy asking the important questions

Posted (edited)

There was no single impactful innings from GL the other day.. DK was the top scorer 50 off 39...

 

In this match, Smith and BMac tore apart the opposition for longer, and Smith's 63 off 37 seemed more impactful..

 

PS : Just to draw a parallel.. 1996 WC Ind vs SL.. Sachin scored 137, but Jayasuriya got the MoM for his 79 just for the impact innings... 

 

There was no impact innings in the RCB vs GL match IMO

Edited by bowl_out
Posted

Going back to the Days where these firangs use to show dissent and get away with nothing and we use to get fines and many more biasness that was part of cricket.

Well ill take such biasness any day. 

N true there is huge diff as smith made 63 0ff 37 n took game away, where as with karthik innnings the platform was already set 

Posted
53 minutes ago, radhika said:

This is like stupid cry baby Anderson getting MOM over Bhuvi in England.:argh:

But booby got the joint mots with barbie i think

Posted
7 minutes ago, adi B said:

But booby got the joint mots with barbie i think

But woh to end mein tha..He was clear MOM for one of the matches but cry baby ko de diya.

×
×
  • Create New...