BeautifulGame Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Only reported by fox and Murdoch media Basically alternative facts
BCCI Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 There are reports of Virat hurling a energy drink bottle at Aus official as well New guy and Rasgulla 2
speedheat Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 This, I am loving this K and K aggression, always wanted us to be fearless and aggressive 😅😅 Days of coolness and " jaddu chai Lana" are Over
MCGGG Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 8 hours ago, express bowling said: Boonie could not run during his playing days even You'd be surprised how fast he can move when there's a beer at stake.
Gollum Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Finally we have a coach that cares. TBH I thought the Kohli decision was a tad unlucky but the correct one, he was out according to the rules laid out. But Kumble showing here that he is very much involved with the team and that he stands by the boys. The dark days of Duncan Fletcher and Captain Cool are over and I couldn't be happier atm.
express bowling Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 5 minutes ago, MCGGG said: You'd be surprised how fast he can move when there's a beer at stake. Boon and Hughes were big favourites of mine. Cricket needs characters like them. Mosher and Vilander 2
TheWall Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 One loss - the aussie public n media have gone mad... they don't know what they are talking,,, what they are reporting... the world has become upside down to those convict cunts.... sscomp32 1
mancalledsting Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 I saw the replay again- it actually looks like it hit the bat first. Because the first deviation is downwards and corresponds to the first sound on snicko i.e. Bat first
jusarrived Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 10 hours ago, express bowling said: It was so close that it is not humanly possible to be sure, without replays, whether the ball hit the pad first or the bat. In this case, it was not possible even with replays. In case of uncertainty, the benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman. The point is , There is no way to be certain that the umpire was uncertain .
TheWall Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 Is there any hard evidence... if not, all the aussie media, ppl, supporters shut up all your nine holes with fevi quick....
Fool Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 16 minutes ago, TheWall said: Is there any hard evidence... if not, all the aussie media, ppl, supporters shut up all your nine holes with fevi quick.... That sounds awfully familiar to us being called "cheaters" in the first place. There isn't any proof it happened multiple times as suggested. But supporters are not keeping quiet about it.
TheWall Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 12 minutes ago, Fool said: That sounds awfully familiar to us being called "cheaters" in the first place. There isn't any proof it happened multiple times as suggested. But supporters are not keeping quiet about it. so, where the proof of kumble storming or kohli throwing a bottle... In that case I can boldly say, that the main reason why referee let of Smith is that's CA CEO handed over hard cash as bribe....
asterix Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 It's amazing to read the views of Aussies. So let's consider it's a one off incident. Do you guys really think that Smith had a "Brain Fade"? And what was Handscombe having? Another "Brain Fade". So collective brain fades? The actions didn't appeared to be brain fade. Handscombe was actually surprised that his captain is not using the "facilities available". He was like, "Smudgy if you can't decide then why don't you ask them buggers, like we always do". I mean from where did Handscombe got this brilliant idea to suggest his captain to take help? TheWall, philcric and beetle 3
MCGGG Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 2 hours ago, TheWall said: One loss - the aussie public n media have gone mad... they don't know what they are talking,,, what they are reporting... the world has become upside down to those convict cunts.... Funny how we didn't have any issues with Sri Lanka or SA, but every time we play India **** like this happens, maybe we should teach you guys a lesson and refuse to both tour your country and host you in ours, you guys need us a lot more than we need you. Vilander 1
Fool Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 35 minutes ago, TheWall said: so, where the proof of kumble storming or kohli throwing a bottle... In that case I can boldly say, that the main reason why referee let of Smith is that's CA CEO handed over hard cash as bribe.... I never said there was proof. Im just a supporter and i dont read newspapers nor just believe the media because they said something speculative. I also dont believe other people when they say something without other evidence to prove it. I have made my opinion clear about what i think of the smith incident in other threads. And it's hardly in favour of him. You are entitled to think what you want to. Im not saying you shouldn't.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 53 minutes ago, Fool said: That sounds awfully familiar to us being called "cheaters" in the first place. There isn't any proof it happened multiple times as suggested. But supporters are not keeping quiet about it. Lets assume it wasnt multiple times.Smith still tried to cheat,Once.
Fool Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 18 minutes ago, MCGGG said: Funny how we didn't have any issues with Sri Lanka or SA, but every time we play India **** like this happens, maybe we should teach you guys a lesson and refuse to both tour your country and host you in ours, you guys need us a lot more than we need you. They don't like the idea that aussies actually understand how to use drs. So something obviously is wrong. Never mind the way we go about it. Even with on field mic's showing how we do it. Those things mean nothing because smith is an idiot and looked at a changeroom once. Therefore we have always cheated and never used drs properly despited hundreds of situations with actual evidence of how we decided. It was all cheating. And people think bigfooty reasoning is bad.
Fool Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 2 minutes ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: Lets assume it wasnt multiple times.Smith still tried to cheat,Once. I agree and i wanted him sanctioned refardless of further proof. Its easy enough to find what my thoughts on this were New guy, philcric and express bowling 3
sandeep Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 4 hours ago, Fool said: They don't like the idea that aussies actually understand how to use drs. So something obviously is wrong. Never mind the way we go about it. Even with on field mic's showing how we do it. Those things mean nothing because smith is an idiot and looked at a changeroom once. Therefore we have always cheated and never used drs properly despited hundreds of situations with actual evidence of how we decided. It was all cheating. And people think bigfooty reasoning is bad. You seem like a reasonable poster so far. Do you mind answering this simple question? If the Smith (and Handscomb) "brain fade" was a "one off", how did Virat Kohli manage to alert the umpires before it happened? Is he capable of reading minds and predicting when "brain fade" specific to DRS are going to happen in 2 australian brains? Is that the story we are supposed to buy?
Fool Posted March 10, 2017 Posted March 10, 2017 2 hours ago, sandeep said: You seem like a reasonable poster so far. Do you mind answering this simple question? If the Smith (and Handscomb) "brain fade" was a "one off", how did Virat Kohli manage to alert the umpires before it happened? Is he capable of reading minds and predicting when "brain fade" specific to DRS are going to happen in 2 australian brains? Is that the story we are supposed to buy? So far i have only heard one person say that the umpires were previously alerted. And because it wasn't the umpires that said that i currently dont believe it entirely to be true. I watched about 90% of the supposed 3 days it had been happening and didnt see any instance where even looking to the rooms would have actually even been an advantage over the information of someone on the field. So i am sceptical that that statement of alerting the umpires beforehand is true mostly for that reason. But at the same time i wasn't really watching closely for situations where dressing room help might be advantageous. If someone else like an umpires had confirmed kohlis statement i would change my perspective and actually would believe that there is something more to this "systematic cheating", but since they haven't and no proof has come out to support it, i am naturally biased towards my team and support them until proven otherwise. I also expect about 10,000+ indian fans have gone through every minute of the game in the last few days looking for their own proof and i expected it to already be out in the media if it was noticeable from the coverage.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now