Are we not aware of the importance of batting strike-rates in T20Is ?

[Kohlifan]

Seems like we have to bear with this till Next World T20..

[express bowling]

Will we see the high SR and high average KL Rahul play tomorrow ?

 

Or will we continue to see ODI XI in T20I matches  ?

[mancalledsting]

seems most people aren't 

[Laaloo]

our finisher has  a strike rate of 119 that includes innings where he faced less balls as well as innings where he promoted himself up the order in easy situations only to suck up the momentum so the answer is a NO

Edited October 31, 2017 by Laaloo

[velu]

1 hour ago, Laaloo said:

our finisher has  a strike rate of 119 that includes innings where he faced less balls as well as innings where he promoted himself up the order in easy situations only to suck up the momentum so the answer is a NO

 

his average is 33 .. mean he is consuming more balls than other batsmen as well

 

[Laaloo]

Just now, velu said:

 

his average is 33 .. mean he is consuming more balls than other batsmen as well

 

along with momentum sucker, hes a ball sucker as well...

[velu]

1 minute ago, Laaloo said:

along with momentum sucker, hes a ball sucker as well...

 

ball breaker as well

 

 

 

[Laaloo]

Not in T20s  

[rkt.india]

7 hours ago, velu said:

 

his average is 33 .. mean he is consuming more balls than other batsmen as well

 

that 33 is because of not outs.

[beetle]

On 07/10/2017 at 11:26 PM, Nonbeliever said:

Kl Rahul should be the first choice for opener.  Looks like Kohli is not keen on sharing the limelight.

His tattoos are better than kohli's.

[beetle]

T-20s should be seen a a T 20 specialist team irrespective of age .

Guys who can score fast against all kinds of bowlers should be given preference.

Bowlers who can restrict these batsmen should be given preference.

Age really doesn't matter in a 20 - 20 game if you are fit.

 

[Pollack]

1 hour ago, beetle said:

T-20s should be seen a a T 20 specialist team irrespective of age .

Guys who can score fast against all kinds of bowlers should be given preference.

Bowlers who can restrict these batsmen should be given preference.

Age really doesn't matter in a 20 - 20 game if you are fit.

 

T20 should be laboratory for trying out new kids. Nehraji (too old to have any future) and dhongiji (TTF ) type has no place.

[beetle]

1 hour ago, Pollack said:

T20 should be laboratory for trying out new kids. Nehraji (too old to have any future) and dhongiji (TTF ) type has no place.

Every format should be taken seriously.

 

The trying outs should be in domestic and team A games. Players should be selected from there, depending on their performance and apptitude for the different formats.

 

How can players be tried for tests and odi's in T- 20 matches?

It is not fair to the players and the team.

 

 

Age does not matter in T-20 because a fit player should be able to bowl four overs and bat 5-6 overs without losing steam or performance.

Edited November 1, 2017 by beetle

[rkt.india]

42 minutes ago, beetle said:

Every format should be taken seriously.

 

The trying outs should be in domestic and team A games. Players should be selected from there, depending on their performance and apptitude for the different formats.

 

How can players be tried for tests and odi's in T- 20 matches?

It is not fair to the players and the team.

 

 

Age does not matter in T-20 because a fit player should be able to bowl four overs and bat 5-6 overs without losing steam or performance.

agree. T20s is not for inexperienced youngster but for experienced players and for youngsters who have developed skill wise. T20 is not an easy format to be successful. ODIs are easier than T20s.

[Pollack]

18 hours ago, beetle said:

Every format should be taken seriously.

 

The trying outs should be in domestic and team A games. Players should be selected from there, depending on their performance and apptitude for the different formats.

 

How can players be tried for tests and odi's in T- 20 matches?

It is not fair to the players and the team.

 

 

Age does not matter in T-20 because a fit player should be able to bowl four overs and bat 5-6 overs without losing steam or performance.

I am not asking to throw any youngster into T20I. Such youngsters are tried in domestics. A select few impressive lads are then tried on A tour. But T20I should be the next stepping stone so that they can be tried at International level.

 

Players can be tried in T20I for ODIs. Obviously it isn't going to be like he played well in T20I so select him in ODI straightway. Neither I am asking to get players in ODi after one or two T20I performances. One can know a lot of batting style, capabilities etc once you watch player in any match any format.

 

Who said you I want selection for tests based on T20? Who does that?

 

I stand by my previous post completely. No place for very old players with skills or not like Nehraji or dhoni. Only experienced players who have outstanding T20 skills can play. Rest use it as an experimentation ground.

 

[beetle]

19 minutes ago, Pollack said:

I am not asking to throw any youngster into T20I. Such youngsters are tried in domestics. A select few impressive lads are then tried on A tour. But T20I should be the next stepping stone so that they can be tried at International level.

 

Players can be tried in T20I for ODIs. Obviously it isn't going to be like he played well in T20I so select him in ODI straightway. Neither I am asking to get players in ODi after one or two T20I performances. One can know a lot of batting style, capabilities etc once you watch player in any match any format.

 

Who said you I want selection for tests based on T20? Who does that?

 

I stand by my previous post completely. No place for very old players with skills or not like Nehraji or dhoni. Only experienced players who have outstanding T20 skills can play. Rest use it as an experimentation ground.

 

But that is not fair to a youngster.

What if he is a good test or ODI prospect but sucks in the T 20 format. His chances of ever making it to test or ODI should not depend on his performance in a format that is not suited to him.

 

What if Pujara , Murali or even Dhawan would have been asked to debut in T 2o internationals?Unki biryani to khichdi ban jati ( source credit- nehraji )

 

The right approach is to introduce the younsters in the right format where they show promise, in low intensity bilaterals where the main players can be rested .....or when injuries demand new players to be introduced.

[express bowling]

2nd T20I vs NZ

 

Needed SR  165

 

Only 2 batters, Kohli and Axar,  crossed a SR of 150

 

But Rahul, with a a career SR of 149,  still warming the benches 

Edited November 4, 2017 by express bowling

[vvvslaxman]

India has batsmen who have been playing T20 for 10 years.  Not only that. Also IPL for 10 years. So it is the lack of ability more than lack of awareness.

Edited November 4, 2017 by vvvslaxman

[express bowling]

3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

India has batsmen who have been playing T20 for 10 years.  Not only that. Also IPL for 10 years. So it is the lack of ability 

 

There are lots of big hitters in the IPL but we choose to pick ODI stars.

[Vilander]

1 hour ago, Shaz1 said:

IPL stars dont always translate into better batsmen.

You should stop talking about stuff you have no idea about...go open a thread about goats in chit chat chal.