Rasgulla Posted January 24, 2018 Posted January 24, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Shunya said: All of Kohli's PR enjoying the batsman failing so that he can get a free pass as a captain. What retarded logic, they do not even get it. Picking Rohit instead of Rahane is even worse. @kira is a Bangladeshi who lives in a cave..Biggest sachin chamcha.. Took him long enough to recover after getting trolled nonstop..Watch how he will react to this post now.. Edited January 24, 2018 by Rasgulla
Trichromatic Posted January 24, 2018 Posted January 24, 2018 3 hours ago, kira said: Great , too bad even after all that his average in the last 1 year is less than 35, so why don't you explain why he averages so low Once there was another batsman who wasn't thrown away from the team for friends after averaging 34 in 12 matches. At least Rahane had good career record and proven performances to back him. This guy had career average of 39 and still captain backed him.
WC2011INDIA Posted January 24, 2018 Posted January 24, 2018 ^ Virat. But you could see he was improving and hungry to succeed.
kira Posted January 24, 2018 Author Posted January 24, 2018 19 minutes ago, Trichromatic said: Once there was another batsman who wasn't thrown away from the team for friends after averaging 34 in 12 matches. At least Rahane had good career record and proven performances to back him. This guy had career average of 39 and still captain backed him. 12 minutes ago, WC2011INDIA said: ^ Virat. But you could see he was improving and hungry to succeed. Exactly, virat was a young improving cricketer who was improving with each game, rahane on the other hand is a 28 year old settled Indian cricketer who is regressing with every match, big big difference between the two
anish2tweet Posted January 25, 2018 Posted January 25, 2018 13 hours ago, Trichromatic said: Before this SA series: 1. SL in India Rahane 17 runs, Kohli 610 runs 2. India in SL Rahane 229 runs at avg of 76, Kohli 161 runs at avg of 53 3. Aus in Ind Rahane 198 runs at avg of 33, Kohli 46 runs at avg of 9 Outperformed Kohli in 2 out of last 3 series only to get dropped. It clearly shows that Kohli+ Shastri combo lacks judgement during selection of XI. Or it may have been Kohli's misjudgement and Shastri's yesmanship
Cricketics Posted January 25, 2018 Posted January 25, 2018 Yes his stats are bad but I expect people to give me a replacement for Rahane and a better number 5 or a better player than him you want to play before asking for him to be dropped. Remember he failed at home but must play based on his over seas reputation for at least few more tests. This is just one innings he failed in. I am all for giving him 3 more tests in England at least.
Khota Posted January 25, 2018 Posted January 25, 2018 Rahane is the best India has. Name a player betterthan hin except kohli? New guy 1
kira Posted January 25, 2018 Author Posted January 25, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Khota said: Rahane is the best India has. Name a player betterthan hin except kohli? If kohli is better than him then how is rahane the best India has? Edited January 25, 2018 by kira
anish2tweet Posted January 25, 2018 Posted January 25, 2018 11 minutes ago, Khota said: Rahane is the best India has. Name a player betterthan hin except kohli? Why Rayudu has not been considered for selection any more? He does well only.
Deleted_User_1 Posted January 25, 2018 Posted January 25, 2018 Can't blame him yet. Poor guy has been turmoil whether he will play or not play throughout the series. Then no match practice whatsover and get thrown into the squad of a lively pitch. Unfortunately with this being the last test there is no time for him to prove himself (in case he does not click in the 2nd innings).
Khota Posted January 25, 2018 Posted January 25, 2018 44 minutes ago, kira said: If kohli is better than him then how is rahane the best India has? I should have been more clear. I meant besides Kohli.
kira Posted January 25, 2018 Author Posted January 25, 2018 1 hour ago, anish2tweet said: Why Rayudu has not been considered for selection any more? He does well only. Because Rayudu is phateechar
vvvslaxman Posted January 26, 2018 Posted January 26, 2018 On 1/24/2018 at 8:06 AM, vvvslaxman said: I expect him to do better in the 2nd innings. Told you Forever Indian 1
Jimmy Cliff Posted January 26, 2018 Posted January 26, 2018 LMAO. Close this Phateechar thread . Trichromatic 1
Trichromatic Posted January 26, 2018 Posted January 26, 2018 In form Rohit would have scored a double hundred here.
Khota Posted January 26, 2018 Posted January 26, 2018 Rohit and Dhawan should have been selected too. Four of these batsman are the nucleus of the team. Ankit_sharma03 and Forever Indian 2
BeautifulGame Posted January 26, 2018 Posted January 26, 2018 We atleast know who the idiots now. Dropping Rahane for Rohit in this series has to be one of the braindead decisions in recent memory. Only bettered by dropping Bhuvi in the last test. We most likely would have been 1-1 going into this test if both Rahane and Bhuvi played all 3 tests. Gollum and kira 1 1
Khota Posted January 26, 2018 Posted January 26, 2018 8 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said: We atleast know who the idiots now. Dropping Rahane for Rohit in this series has to be one of the braindead decisions in recent memory. Only bettered by dropping Bhuvi in the last test. We most likely would have been 1-1 going into this test if both Rahane and Bhuvi played all 3 tests. We would have been 3-0 if Vijay/Rahul/Saha and Ashwin did not play. kira 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now