Jump to content

Captaincy Ratings (Indian captains)


vvvslaxman

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Pollack said:

Dude if he is getting selected in team continously he is going to do well in some matches. In any case the point of argument was not whether he was backed or not after all jadeja was playing every match without bowling or batting. You made a point that he is giving confidence to Jadeja for greater good of India at the expense of CSK which is crap. Jadeja doing good (not even outstanding) in two or three matches of 14 matches to be played total isn't anything special. Play even Joginder Sharma for all 14 matches he will too do good in a few. 

i never said greater good of india, its only good for CSK

The idea is to give player confidence in whole tournament coz ull need every at some point of time .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant find any other relevant thread so will post here. 

 

Williamson's move in the 18th over to give the ball to Brathwaite caused the loss. 

 

The moment i saw Brathwaite, i knew CSK can be back. And that guy ended up bowling pies in the arc. :hysterical:

 

Unbelievably stupid move. Should have bowled bhuvi, kaul and then sandeep.

Edited by sensible-indian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sensible-indian said:

Cant find any other relevant thread so will post here. 

 

Williamson's move in the 18th over to give the ball to Brathwaite caused the loss. 

 

The moment i saw Brathwaite, i knew CSK can be back. And that guy ended up bowling pies in the arc. :hysterical:

 

Unbelievably stupid move. Should have bowled bhuvi, kaul and then sandeep.

yep he should have bowled bhuvi in that over,totally inane move 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

yep he should have bowled bhuvi in that over,totally inane move 

Fauf was going to go after any bowler. Their moves were good. Where the miscalculated was unexpected batting skills of Shardul Thakur. You really think someone liek Markhende could have pulled off what Thakur did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Fauf was going to go after any bowler. Their moves were good. Where the miscalculated was unexpected batting skills of Shardul Thakur. You really think someone liek Markhende could have pulled off what Thakur did?

bhuvi would have been difficult to hit , when bhuvi had only 6 runs to defend,the match was as good as gone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

bhuvi would have been difficult to hit , when bhuvi had only 6 runs to defend,the match was as good as gone

Fauf was in the zone. He smashed Bhuvi for a six in the end. CSK had just 2 wickets in hand with Bhuvi and Kaul to bowl. All they had to do was bowl 3 or 4 dot balls to Thakur

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Fauf was in the zone. He smashed Bhuvi for a six in the end. CSK had just 2 wickets in hand with Bhuvi and Kaul to bowl. All they had to do was bowl 3 or 4 dot balls to Thakur

faf found it difficult to hit an over before that , bhuvi is world class,now way he would have been smashed like a braithwaite,it was a tactical blunder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SK_IH said:

faf found it difficult to hit an over before that , bhuvi is world class,now way he would have been smashed like a braithwaite,it was a tactical blunder

He could have smashed Brathwhite or Sandeep in the last over. Bhaji might have connected a few against Bhuvi. You never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

He could have smashed Brathwhite or Sandeep in the last over. Bhaji might have connected a few against Bhuvi. You never know.

last over pressure is different, in last 4 overs of the inning one should never take chances with mediocre bowlers, 20 runs over changes the games, i remember it was corey anderson vs rcb , even if your best bowler goes for runs it doesnt matter atleast he is your best option

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlos move made sense. He gave less than 6 rpo before his over. His or Kaul wouldn't matter at that time. What Kane missed was not bowling Bhuvi in the 19th. He would have been against Thakur. If he could have picked a wicket or conceded around 8 runs or something. Kaul/Sandeep anyone would have fancied defending around 15 in the last over. Kaul was kind of a mistake but again who would have thought Thakur would end up with three boundaries in that over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Sonix768 said:

Carlos move made sense. He gave less than 6 rpo before his over. His or Kaul wouldn't matter at that time. What Kane missed was not bowling Bhuvi in the 19th. He would have been against Thakur. If he could have picked a wicket or conceded around 8 runs or something. Kaul/Sandeep anyone would have fancied defending around 15 in the last over. Kaul was kind of a mistake but again who would have thought Thakur would end up with three boundaries in that over.

Actually Kaul was better than Bhuvi in the match. He was landing his yorkers perfectly. Even he bowled very well to Thakur. But nobody expected how Thakur was able to manuoever the ball except the 2nd ball. First ball was intentional. But it was lucky it went between the slip and keeper. He connected all the balls very well in that over. Let us not forget how Vijay shankar struggled against Fiz not long ago in the end overs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...