Jump to content

How was that not a no-ball??


Recommended Posts

Posted

The umpiring has been piss poor this series. The second test with the rain and pujara run out was abysmal. If the English were batting they would have never taken the field. But we take the field, go off. Come back on the field, try to get off and reach the boundary, then are called back to the field. Play two balls and pujara gets run out. Next ball, we have to get off the field.

 

And today this no ball. Bumrah was similar and it was called a no ball.

And that boundary that wasn't called. They saw one replay and you couldn't even see the ball and decided it wasn't a boundary. They didn't show any replays after that. Very biased umpiring. 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Touch and go. Also Che wasn't offering a shot in that LBW shout (just before his 100), 3rd umpire messed that up as well.

He did offer a shot. It hit the pad. And wickets were missing anyways.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

He did offer a shot. It hit the pad. And wickets were missing anyways.

Did they show hawk-eye? Because that was some sharp spin.....It appeared he pulled his bat out just before the ball struck the pad.

Edited by Gollum
Posted
19 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Did they show hawk-eye? Because that was some sharp spin.....It appeared he pulled his bat out just before the ball struck the pad.

No he did offer a shot. Yeah they showed it next over. It was going over and missing wickets.

Posted
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Did they show hawk-eye? Because that was some sharp spin.....It appeared he pulled his bat out just before the ball struck the pad.

Which ball was it? We can check hawk eye at cricinfo.

Posted

Can't harp about this decision, Rahane batted like a clown and deserved what he got. Our hockey team got a bad call in the penalty shoot outs against Malaysia, 1st attempt....they took it on the chin and moved on because the umpiring wasn't the reason we lost the SF. If we lose here I hope no excuses are made, some of our players are simply not good enough.

Posted
8 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

Which ball was it? We can check hawk eye at cricinfo.

72.5, I checked it now...was missing the stumps.

Posted (edited)

May be Joel Wilson doesn't like to over rule on-field decisions, conclusive reason to overturn and all that ****.

Edited by Gollum

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...