Jump to content

If a captain can be dropped for his captaincy


zen

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

You are naive to think Aussie tailenders will throw away like our Shami and co will do. These guys just saved a brilliant test match against Pakistani spin bowling attack in alien conditions. Only Starc was supposed to plau his shots which he kind of did but they were never going to play as many arial shorts as you would want. Yes odd fielder here and there one can argue for, but field set was fine for Starc as we need fielder for him on the boundary. 

 

And regarding other tailenders, as soon as Lyon or anyone came including Cummins to Ashwin, fielders were mostly inside. 

 

 

You are also contradicting yourself. If only Starc was supposed to play his shots then what was the need to have such defensive fields, have boundary riders against Starc but attack others.

Link to comment
Just now, rkt.india said:

You are also contradicting yourself. If only Starc was supposed to play his shots then what was the need to have such defensive fields, have boundary riders against Starc but attack others.

Ofhers were attacked with bouncers mainly. Lyon and all were welcomed with bouncers than wide of off stump and field was set to baised om those deliveries.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Nikola said:

There were many time when kohli's pathetic captaincy lost to win small moments and then in end you loose match and series.

Kohli got the first few wickets today because he read the chapters {( 5-115 (TM Head, 56.4 ov), 6-156 (SE Marsh, 72.1 ov), 7-187 (TD Paine, 84.1 ov) }. But Paine got out got out, he became clueless as he thought those were optional Chapters.

 

Bottomline is if he doesnt have cricketing brain, why not put  some extra effort in doing homework

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Cricketics said:

Ofhers were attacked with bouncers mainly. Lyon and all were welcomed with bouncers than wide of off stump and field was set to baised om those deliveries.

That is the problem. Attack doesn't mean bowl bouncers. Aussie lower order is not exactly mug with the bat. You have to bowl to them like you would to proper bats.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

That is the problem. Attack doesn't mean bowl bouncers. Aussie lower order is not exactly mug with the bat. You have to bowl to them like you would to proper bats.

do you really think if he went al out with attacking fields they would have won this match easier. I don't think so. We have to honest Ashwin was never the same threat as Lyon and our fast bowlers cannot run thru side, so as a captain he took conservative approach and made them work for their runs.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

Joburg 13 when Dhoni was captain he was defending 448,  he went all out attack and was leaking runs like anything and in the end it was SA who were in position to win that test. All out attack works only if you have capable bowlers.Indian bowling attack will not work with all out attack they will lose control very easily.

lol I have used the same argument for Dhoni when he was getting critisized by likes of you for being overtly defensive . Funny that we are defending Virat here with the same excuse today when Virat clearly has a much superior bowling at disposal . 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

What captaincy blunders did he commit, Ashwin had to play this test and most probly will play next test too, given they have 6 lefties.

 

The bigger problem is how Ashwin was unable to exploit that rough against righties.

ahswin was trying to avoid bowling at the rough 

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, jusarrived said:

lol I have used the same argument for Dhoni when he was getting critisized by likes of you for being overtly defensive . Funny that we are defending Virat here with the same excuse today when Virat clearly has a much superior bowling at disposal . 

I criticized Dhoni the captain for defensive like waiting to declare with even 600 plus runs not going after easy targets to win a test. But that test he put attacking fields even when Zak and Shami were just not able to do anything. It was attacking field without backing of his bowlers.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...