Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 46 minutes ago, bahubali said: All I know is post 13 CT we are the side who is choking more. What happened before 13 has no relevance now. As after 13 barring one or two players most of the team are same. after 13- kuldeep, bumrah, chahal, pandya, jadhav....shami also didnt play in ct 13 Look i knw under kohli high chances we ll choke but we are way ahead then england specialy in a pressure game Link to comment
Pollack Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 (edited) 15 hours ago, bowl_out said: Our WC hopes hinge on RohKol, KulCha and BumSham.... to an extent PanDha Most of the others are passengers. So only 3 players are passenger. Also in ICC tournaments, dhawan would be more clutch than tuk tuk and lottery Rohit Sharma. Edited February 9, 2019 by Pollack Sgattick10 1 Link to comment
maniac Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 @Nikola You can’t compare man to man India vs England. Obviously India looks ahead on paper. However England’s strength is batting and bowling depth. They have 7 bowlers and 10 batsmen. That is a huge advantage Jimmy Cliff 1 Link to comment
Pollack Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 When you pack the team with a lot of batsmen it's a double edged sword. Sometimes you don't know how to go about building an innings since the cushion of a long batting can make top order careless and irresponsible. Link to comment
Sgattick10 Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 Their bowling doesn't look that impressive. Batting though Link to comment
bowl_out Posted February 9, 2019 Author Share Posted February 9, 2019 44 minutes ago, Pollack said: So only 3 players are passenger. Also in ICC tournaments, dhawan would be more clutch than tuk tuk and lottery Rohit Sharma. Yes, 3 in the XI and 7 in the squad. That's actually a lot. Also, the problem is that all three in the XI are there to perform the same role - middle order. So there's no alternative. Link to comment
Cricketics Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 55 minutes ago, Pollack said: When you pack the team with a lot of batsmen it's a double edged sword. Sometimes you don't know how to go about building an innings since the cushion of a long batting can make top order careless and irresponsible. That is why your west zone team from other thread will crash and burn :) Link to comment
velu Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 their bowlers are pie chcukers .. but they can bat Link to comment
Cricketics Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Pollack said: When you pack the team with a lot of batsmen it's a double edged sword. Sometimes you don't know how to go about building an innings since the cushion of a long batting can make top order careless and irresponsible. Never mind, I keep confusing you with Gollum, I thought you were same poster lol 9 minutes ago, Cricketics said: That is why your west zone team from other thread will crash and burn :) Link to comment
Cricketics Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 England batting looks strong but so will Australia’s if they plau Lynn and Maxwell in same linenup. They are bound to click after few failures and cause havoc like any other hitters. Contrast that to our Guntur and Thala. Link to comment
Adi BB Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 England batting looks so dangerous just like India's in 2011 that they dont even need a bowling attack to romp through sides .the format also suits them ,they are pretty good in the SFs generally Suhaan 1 Link to comment
maniac Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 @Jimmy Cliff kya confusion hai bhai? Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 7 minutes ago, maniac said: @Jimmy Cliff kya confusion hai bhai? This part . 14 hours ago, maniac said: You can’t compare man to man India vs England. Obviously India looks ahead on paper. Link to comment
maniac Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Jimmy Cliff said: This part . What I meant is in Nikolas post he did a man to man analysis. India has more specialists than allrounders so obviously India May look stronger. However the batting and bowling depth of England gives them an edge. Jimmy Cliff 1 Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, maniac said: What I meant is in Nikolas post he did a man to man analysis. India has more specialists than allrounders so obviously India May look stronger. However the batting and bowling depth of England gives them an edge. I guess that's where I disagree. IMO we look stronger man to man only if we completely ignore the black hole of a middle order that we have. Link to comment
SK_IH Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Eng should be disappointed if they don't win the WC with this depth in batting.They are pretty similar to what Aus were in 2015 with regards to explosive batting depth. Pretty much their WC to lose. Link to comment
bahubali Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 14 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: after 13- kuldeep, bumrah, chahal, pandya, jadhav....shami also didnt play in ct 13 Look i knw under kohli high chances we ll choke but we are way ahead then england specialy in a pressure game Time ll Tell. Kohli legacy in odi is definitely hinge on this WC after CT final humiliation. Stan AF and SK_IH 1 1 Link to comment
Stan AF Posted February 10, 2019 Share Posted February 10, 2019 Its good to see all chinks exposed in the bowling today. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now