Harsh Thakor Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 (edited) Three of the most flamboyant batsmen of recent times were Mark Waugh,Inzamam Ul Haq and V.V.S.Laxman.All 3 posesesd talent in regions of the sublime.Inzy has supreme reflexes and power while Waugh and V.V.S.took artistry in batting to it's supreme depth and were the epitome of elegance..All 3 could turn a game 180 degrees with their dazzling strokeplay and all were masters of genuine pace,relishing fast tracks.All of them played outstanding match-wining knocks in run chases and proved their prowess on bad wickets.At their best they challenged the supremacy of the greatest of batsmen. Technically Mark Waugh stood out and to me was the most complete of the trio.Few batsmen ever blended domination of bowling with such grace and technical correctness.Statistically Inzy was the best of the pack scoring 25 centuries and averaging around 50 with the best average in games won.At their best V.V.S. was at the top of the pedestal scoring arguably the best century of all time versus Australia in Kolkata in 2001 ,playing the best innings in wins in run -chases and participating most in the best match-winning partnerships.He also took batting artistry to regions of divinty.Mark has the best record in South Africa ,Inzy was the epitome of consistency in West Indies while V.V.S was outstanding against.Australia.Laxman was however not at his best in England like Inzamam or Waugh.Inzy was statistically not at his best against the best teams of his days or in South Africa and Australia. With a gun on my head my order would be Inzamam,Mark Waugh and Laxman . Edited February 21, 2019 by Harsh Thakor
Popular Post velu Posted February 21, 2019 Popular Post Posted February 21, 2019 bhai .. 3 players can be arranged in 6 different ways laxman , inzi , waugh laxman , waugh , inzi inzi , waugh , laxman inzi , laxman , waugh waugh , laxman , inzi waugh , , inzi , laxman Quote The number of ways of arranging n unlike objects in a line is n! (pronounced ‘n factorial’). n! = n × (n – 1) × (n – 2) ×…× 3 × 2 × 1.. Number of ways 3 players can be arranged = 3! = 3 * 2 * 1 = 6 maniac, zen, philcric and 11 others 1 13
Khota Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 There could be possibly 3 factorial combinations. Total possible combinations should be 6. My answer is: Waugh, Laxman, Haq (strictly fron Indian point of view). Real McCoy, bahubali and velu 1 2
rkt.india Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 (edited) VVS Laxman, Inzamam-ul-Hack, Mark Waugh for tests Edited February 21, 2019 by rkt.india
Stan AF Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 Mark Waugh (Slip Fielding, Batting, and Part time bowling). Inzi (Batting, comical value in run outs) Laxman (Test Batting)
Nikola Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 Tests: Laxman = Inzy > Waugh Odis: Waugh >> Inzy >> Laxman
vvvslaxman Posted February 21, 2019 Posted February 21, 2019 You missed one order. Alphabetical order.
Rightarmfast Posted February 22, 2019 Posted February 22, 2019 Has to be Waugh, Laxman and then Inzimam. I wonder how @Harsh Thakor is calling mark Waugh technically beautiful to watch. His batting was ugly but supremely effective. HIs captaincy, his part time bowling adds to his persona. Laxman scored against the best in test cricket. Inzy is a genuine Pakistan great, however not in the same league as Waugh or Laxman
Sooda Posted February 22, 2019 Posted February 22, 2019 8 hours ago, Rightarmfast said: Has to be Waugh, Laxman and then Inzimam. I wonder how @Harsh Thakor is calling mark Waugh technically beautiful to watch. His batting was ugly but supremely effective. HIs captaincy, his part time bowling adds to his persona. Laxman scored against the best in test cricket. Inzy is a genuine Pakistan great, however not in the same league as Waugh or Laxman Are you confusing Waugh brothers? Laxman, Inzy, Waugh in tests Waugh should have been much better with his ability.
Rightarmfast Posted February 23, 2019 Posted February 23, 2019 5 hours ago, Sooda said: Are you confusing Waugh brothers? Laxman, Inzy, Waugh in tests Waugh should have been much better with his ability. ok. freaks. Yes, I was talkiing about Steve. I agree with your rating.
Harsh Thakor Posted February 26, 2019 Author Posted February 26, 2019 Well evaluated.Reflects true greatness of Mark.Still disagree on Inzy.Why do you rank Inzy below the others?WA he not the best of match-winners and a master against pace?
Harsh Thakor Posted February 26, 2019 Author Posted February 26, 2019 On 2/22/2019 at 6:38 PM, Rightarmfast said: Has to be Waugh, Laxman and then Inzimam. I wonder how @Harsh Thakor is calling mark Waugh technically beautiful to watch. His batting was ugly but supremely effective. HIs captaincy, his part time bowling adds to his persona. Laxman scored against the best in test cricket. Inzy is a genuine Pakistan great, however not in the same league as Waugh or Laxman Why Inzy not in the same league with his great record as a match-winner and against pace?I still feel Mark Waugh posessed supreme elegance and immaculate batting technique.
Harsh Thakor Posted February 26, 2019 Author Posted February 26, 2019 On 2/21/2019 at 7:02 PM, rkt.india said: VVS Laxman, Inzamam-ul-Hack, Mark Waugh for tests Was not Inzamam more consistent in tests and a better match-winner than VVS?Did not Mark Waugh have a better overseas record than Laxman and Inzy and was a more complete batsmen?
Harsh Thakor Posted February 26, 2019 Author Posted February 26, 2019 On 2/23/2019 at 3:18 PM, Straight Drive said: Waugh, Laxman, Inzi. Well evaluated.Reflects true greatness of Mark.Still disagree on Inzy.Why do you rank Inzy below the others?Was he not the best of match-winners and a master against pace? Waugh was the most complete of them.
Harsh Thakor Posted February 26, 2019 Author Posted February 26, 2019 On 2/22/2019 at 8:25 AM, Adi BB said: Laxman> fatso > Waugh in tests . Waugh had a better record overseas .Inzamam was more consistent and a better match- winner than Laxman.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now