Lannister Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Why the Indian phuckers are siding up with International players. It's obvious they have their own agendas and these fools are too thick to even realise that. And for those who are abusing his family, go phuck yourselves. flamy, construction430, Stan AF and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero_Unit Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) My opinion might be unpopular but puck it: If all the players b*tch and moans about it, remove it from the rulebook. If ICC keeps it in the rulebook, ain't no shame in implementing the law. Should the WK need to ask the batsmen permisson or give him a warning or two before taking the bails out? If not, neither should the bowler and get shame handed down their throat for it. All these players/fans b*tching and moaning, it's in the rulebook. He didn't do anything outside the rulebook. Puck the spirit of the game, batsmen walking out before the bowler even bowled it is against spirit of the game aswell so fair game! Edited March 26, 2019 by Zero_Unit Suhaan, Stan AF and nevada 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan AF Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) 14 hours ago, Gollum said: What is disgraceful is 2 teams still allowed to play this league inspite of overwhelming corruption charges. What is disgraceful is Mudgal Committee not releasing the names of the fixers, meanwhile fixers are making TV shows to clear their names. 2 of them are even flexing their muscles in BCCI and Team India without any feeling of guilt, one of them a perjurer !!! It's a fricking farce that Mudgal committee is not releasing the names of the players in the envelope. Edited March 26, 2019 by Stan AF Gollum 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turning_track Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 It is understandable that this controversy will generate divisive opinions, but abusing Ash & his family is just pathetic & shows the mentality of a bunch of Indian fans. Zero_Unit 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 33 minutes ago, Zero_Unit said: My opinion might be unpopular but puck it: If all the players b*tch and moans about it, remove it from the rulebook. If ICC keeps it in the rulebook, ain't no shame in implementing the law. Should the WK need to ask the batsmen permisson or give him a warning or two before taking the bails out? If not, neither should the bowler and get shame handed down their throat for it. All these players/fans b*tching and moaning, it's in the rulebook. He didn't do anything outside the rulebook. Puck the spirit of the game, batsmen walking out before the bowler even bowled it is against spirit of the game aswell so fair game! Believe me, that will expose so called Gentleman stuff as Its not practical. Batsmen cheat and they know that they are cheating. ICC also knows that its batsman who is cheating. Thats why they made it very clear. Why cant batsman just stay in his crease a little longer flamy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero_Unit Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Just now, mishra said: Believe me, that will expose so called Gentleman stuff as Its not practical. Batsmen cheat and they know that they are cheating. ICC also knows that its batsman who is cheating. Thats why they made it very clear. Why cant batsman just stay in his crease a little longer IKR. Imagine we shamed the bowler each time someone stumped the batsmen out. What kind of stupidity is this? If it's in the rulebook, it's in the rulebook. It's not like the bowler just made up the rule out of his arse. ICC made it legal, players implemented it. If it was me, I would not even give one warning and take the bells off right away, let alone take this crap as SPIRIT OF THE GAME into account when it's fair game for the batsmen to take that slight advantage to steal a single. Sachinism 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nevada Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Wall2018 said: At this rate... Some day stumping will also be called bad sportsmanship.... Yes. Gentlemen should not opportunistically dismiss a batsman like that. Also, batsmen should stop running on overthrows. And they should walk even if they get caught or bowled off a no ball. Hey, if a batsman can steal a feet so should the bowler, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 8 minutes ago, Zero_Unit said: IKR. Imagine we shamed the bowler each time someone stumped the batsmen out. What kind of stupidity is this? If it's in the rulebook, it's in the rulebook. It's not like the bowler just made up the rule out of his arse. ICC made it legal, players implemented it. If it was me, I would not even give one warning and take the bells off right away, let alone take this crap as SPIRIT OF THE GAME into account when it's fair game for the batsmen to take that slight advantage to steal a single. Thats exactly the rule is. You dont need to warn. And rule has been simplified because more often then not its allways a English or Aussie batsman who is doing it and hence the outcry flamy and Zero_Unit 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 6 hours ago, nevada said: Terrorism vs Mandkading comparison isnt apples to apples either. Terrorism for any so called cause is illegal. Mankading isn't illegal. More bowlers should start doing this to keep batsmen in check. It's an eyesore to watch batsmen plundering runs at will with the bowlers reduced to ball boy status. Mankading is ok if done in the right spirit. I am against Ashwining, which is a con job The example of terrorism is used to indicate that people even try to justify it using their logic. At the end of the day, it is about doing the right thing. Playing cricket in the right spirit is the right thing to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachinism Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) YES!!! This is what we were looking forward to. Gwaan Ashwin you bloody champion! Don't leave your crease if you don't wanna be run out. Edited March 26, 2019 by Sachinism nevada and flamy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suhaan Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 What Ash did was within the rulebooks,there is nothing called"spirit of the game" Is there?? nevada 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 18 minutes ago, zen said: Mankading is ok if done in the right spirit. I am against Ashwining, which is a con job The example of terrorism is used to indicate that people even try to justify it using their logic. At the end of the day, it is about doing the right thing. Playing cricket in the right spirit is the right thing to do You are justifying cheating mate where batsman is trying to steal a quick single by taking a headstart. Mankading is famous because it was done in a "test match". If I am to guess, It was original Mankading where batsman may have been more innocent flamy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 This is not Mankading. But Ashwining, which is a con job made to look like Mankading .... that is if people can understand the difference! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachinism Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 47 minutes ago, Zero_Unit said: IKR. Imagine we shamed the bowler each time someone stumped the batsmen out. What kind of stupidity is this? If it's in the rulebook, it's in the rulebook. It's not like the bowler just made up the rule out of his arse. ICC made it legal, players implemented it. If it was me, I would not even give one warning and take the bells off right away, let alone take this crap as SPIRIT OF THE GAME into account when it's fair game for the batsmen to take that slight advantage to steal a single. Spirit of cricket is the biggest load of crap I've ever heard. It's akin to your patriotic duty. Zero_Unit and flamy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachinism Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Buttler needs to be pulled up by the IPL heads for his disgraceful behaviour after being given out and after the match too. Petulant child. philcric and flamy 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Whingeing Poms and Pak!s using this incident to take potshots at India, and Indians unsurprisingly cheering them on. flamy and velu 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 4 minutes ago, mishra said: You are justifying cheating mate where batsman is trying to steal a quick single by taking a headstart. Mankading is famous because it was done in a "test match". If I am to guess, It was original Mankading where batsman may have been more innocent People are against Ashwining, a con job made to look like Mankading Therefore, there is no point in listing Mankading laws or implying that batsman could have been out of his crease on the previous ball or whatever. In this case, he wasn’t, if Ashwin had bowled normally Let’s not get into conjectures on original Mankading Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CG Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 People are against Ashwining, a con job made to look like Mankading Therefore, there is no point in listing Mankading laws or implying that batsman could have been out of his crease on the previous ball or whatever. In this case, he wasn’t, if Ashwin had bowled normally Let’s not get into conjectures on original Mankading Butler was outside of his crease on all previous balls of the over.So ashwin did the right thing according to rules. philcric 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, CG said: 12 minutes ago, zen said: People are against Ashwining, a con job made to look like Mankading Therefore, there is no point in listing Mankading laws or implying that batsman could have been out of his crease on the previous ball or whatever. In this case, he wasn’t, if Ashwin had bowled normally Let’s not get into conjectures on original Mankading Butler was outside of his crease on all previous balls of the over.So ashwin did the right thing according to rules. As I said before, ppl can even justify terrorism using their “logic” .... As mentioned in the post, Ashwining, a conjob made to look like Mankading, is not the right thing to do. Do it properly when the batsman is “actually” out (not like the batsman has a tendency to get out so if I purposely delay, his start will eventually take him out and I will run him out) PS and see what the universal boss did when there was a genuine case for Mankading Edited March 26, 2019 by zen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CG Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 As I said before, ppl can even justify terrorism using their “logic” .... As mentioned in the post, Ashwining, a conjob made to look like Mankading, is not the right thing to do. Do it properly when the batsman is actually out There is no proper way to do it, it's always premeditated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts