SRT100 Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 On the weekend, I saw Sachin batting with more intent than these clowns today.
SRT100 Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Just now, nitinbwj said: 4 wickets for Bennett now Only India can make average bowlers look lethal and world class. zen 1
R!TTER Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 That looked like a no ball for sure, chitting umpires
vvvslaxman Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Fake all rounder gone. This is why you need proper bowlers who can take wickets and proper batsmen. These bits and pieces players do more harm than help. Jadeja, Jadhav, Thakur, Dube.
zen Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Southee only gone at 6 RPO so far .... Good that I switched off the TV
vvvslaxman Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Bhuvi, Shami, Bumrah, Kulcha in full flight would have defend this total.
New guy Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 5 minutes ago, Andy said: With Pant in the side we would possibly be 170 odd for 5. From that position even 260-270 would be hard to get. The best bet for Pant is to bat as an opener. Pant can easily come in Panday's place, how will we be 170 odd for 5? And he has been making 20s-30s too, not like he scores a duck every time. Kuch bhi? He has played many responsible innings in domsectic and IPL so this narrative of a blind slogger is pathetic Rasgulla, Cricwala, zen and 2 others 1 4
raki05 Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Kohli ko jutey se maaro Saley ko....how come pant can't play ahead of likes of jadhav and pandey . Selection of Thakur is also baffling even shami can hit 10- 12 runs. Mosher 1
vvvslaxman Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Guys settle down. We are over reacting for Jadeja, Thakur, Pandey not connecting the ball. What did you expect? They connect once in a blue moon.
zen Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Just now, New guy said: Pant can easily come in Panday's place, how will we be 170 odd for 5? And he has been making 20s-30s too, not like he scores a duck every time. Kuch bhi? He has played many responsible innings in domsectic and IPL so this narrative of a blind slogger is pathetic And has two test 100s Mosher and New guy 2
rollingstoned Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Lol he hits a full toss straight up in the air. The only guy who can properly go big in the lower order is thakur and maybe saini now. Bakiyon se na ho paega. Saini himself is a poorer version of umesh and shami with the bat.
vvvslaxman Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 With no Rohit, Dhawan and failure of Kohli, run out Shaw we have 284. That in itself is ag ood achievement. Usually we would have folded for 185 rollingstoned and Cricspin 2
Lannister Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 290 is more than enough on this slowish pitch. People need to relax.
cowboysfan Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 we dont have the bowlers to defend this and pitch has eased out.
rollingstoned Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 It's about time our bowling won us a game. Feels like a long time ago since kulcha got demystified and bumrah and pandya got injured.
vvvslaxman Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Just now, cowboysfan said: we dont have the bowlers to defend this and pitch has eased out. We should worry about that rather than worry about nt putting up 350 every time. We are no England. We have to remember where they bat till no.9 no.10. Even ARcher can slog. Our par score is 300. cowboysfan 1
Andy Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 Just now, New guy said: Pant can easily come in Panday's place, how will we be 170 odd for 5? And he has been making 20s-30s too, not like he scores a duck every time. Kuch bhi? He has played many responsible innings in domsectic and IPL so this narrative of a blind slogger is pathetic Compare the success against failures. He has an issue with temperament, shot selection, doesnt know how to pace the innings. 8 out of 10 times as the recent records suggest India would be 170-180 odd for 5. Because of Pandey we got to the point something to bowl at. Not that I am suggesting Pandey is the best option at Number 6, neither Pant is. But when you need to build an innings Pandey will do more times compared to Pant by a country mile. If you play Pant, play him in top 3, else his game (as of now is not made for 50 over cricket. Laaloo, vvvslaxman, Kohlifan and 2 others 1 1 2 1
New guy Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, Lannister said: 290 is more than enough on this slowish pitch. People need to relax. Pitch has eased out and will ease out more in second innings
vvvslaxman Posted February 11, 2020 Posted February 11, 2020 NZ defended a low total last time with no frontline bowlers. Why can't we do with our front line bowlers
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now