Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, velu said:

KL

warner

mayank

samson

williamson

iyer

tewatia

rashid

Archer

shami

chakravarthy

Iyer is the weak link. He's not a finisher. Also Williamson won't do much batting at 5. Lack of a finisher/lower order. And only 5 bowling options. If one bowler gets taken to the cleaners/has a bad day they'll have to persist with that bowler throughout.

 

Maybe this team can win once in a league match. But definitely not beating them in a final.

Posted
1 minute ago, I6MTW said:

Iyer is the weak link. He's not a finisher. Also Williamson won't do much batting at 5. Lack of a finisher/lower order. And only 5 bowling options. If one bowler gets taken to the cleaners/has a bad day they'll have to persist with that bowler throughout.

 

Maybe this team can win once in a league match. But definitely not beating them in a final.

 

most of the time iyer was consolidating because of the openers getting out early :dontknow:

he did really well for the chances he got in iT20s .. damn good vs spin and decent vs short stuff .. miles better than pandey & co 

Posted

Warner(or any) < Kock

KL > Rohit 

Mayank = SKY

ABD = Kishan

Samson < Pollard

Buttler > Hardik

Tewatia > Krunal

Archer = Boult

Rabada = Bumrah

Rashid > Chahar

Chakravarthy > NCN

 

That's 5-2 against MI. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jamadagni said:

Warner(or any) < Kock

KL > Rohit 

Mayank = SKY

ABD = Kishan

Samson < Pollard

Buttler > Hardik

Tewatia > Krunal

Archer = Boult

Rabada = Bumrah

Rashid > Chahar

Chakravarthy > NCN

 

That's 5-2 against MI. 

Warner is better than Kock. So is ABD. I don't think Rabada is better than Bumrah. He was taken to the cleaners and thrashed several times, especially in the last half of the season, didn't do anything worthy. Failed in the final as well. 

 

And How come you have 6 ipl foreigners?

 

Posted

Among all the batsmen who have got 400+ runs, we should simply remove the guys who had a strike rate below 130. KL Rahul can be given a leeway as it is 129 S/R and his runs were far more. Also Paddikal as it was his initial season and just 20 years old.

 

But let's remove

 

Shreyas Iyer 510 runs, S/R 123

Virat Kohli 466 runs, S/R 122

Shubhman Gill 440 runs, S/R 117

Manish Pandey 425 runs, S/R 127

 

Rest all who have got 400+ runs can be considered to have a successful IPL season.

Posted
2 hours ago, maniac said:

SRH did beat :mi:

 

we actually won by a lot @velu

In a game where :mi: rested every bowler worth anything. And in a game where :mi: had *NOTHING* at stake, having already qualified first of the table.

 

Sure, keep harping about that. We'll keep the IPL trophy.

Posted
9 hours ago, Mariyam said:

In a game where :mi: rested every bowler worth anything. And in a game where :mi: had *NOTHING* at stake, having already qualified first of the table.

 

Sure, keep harping about that. We'll keep the IPL trophy.

Rajasthan was the only team that decently beat, no thrashed, Mumbai. RCB and KXIP's victories were both fine lines, requiring super and double super overs respectively 

 

And CSK's victory doesn't count since it was the first match of the season, and most of the players hadn't played cricket in month, MI needed time to adjust their team combination. 

 

So RR was the only legit win this season.

Posted

Rahul

Stokes

Samson

Pooran

Buttler

Samad

Tewatia

Archer

M Shami

Chahal

Natarajan

 

Thought a lot but this team looks good to take on MI. I couldn't think of many "India International" players while thinking of making this team, highlights the ordinary XI we play in T20Is :facepalm:

Posted
6 minutes ago, bowl_out said:

 

Iyer at 6 is a joke..

Maybe Samad or even DK is better.

 

And Natarajan for Shami

 

scored 500+ runs .. would add samad but he himself played 4/5 games only 

×
×
  • Create New...