Jump to content

12 Best batsman amongst the all-rounders in order of merit


12 Best batsman amongst the all-rounders in order of merit  

7 members have voted

  1. 1. Who were the 5 best ever batsman amongst the all-rounders?

    • Kapil Dev
    • Vinoo Mankad
    • Ian Botham
    • Imran Khan
    • Mushtaq Mohammad
      0
    • Audrey Faulkner
      0
    • Frank Worrell
      0
    • Keith Miller
    • Gary Sobers
    • Jacqes Kallis
    • Asif Iqbal
    • Tony Greig
    • Chris Cairns
      0
    • Ben Stokes
    • Andrew Flintoff
      0
    • Azhar Mehmood
      0
    • Abdur Razzaq
      0
    • Walter Hammond
      0
    • Shaun Polock
      0
    • Hardik Pandya


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This is my selection in order of merit of the 12 best batsman amongst the genuine allrounders.


1.Gary Sobers
2.Jacques Kallis
3.Asif Iqbal
4.Tony Greig
5.Vinoo Mankad
6.Mushtaq Muhammad
7.Keith Miller
8.Ian Botham
9.Ben Stokes
10.Andrew Flintoff
11.Kapil Dev
12.Imran Khan



Sobers staggering record and ability to pulverize attacks speaks for itself.Few batsman were er as complete.In terms of statistics Kallis was close to the best of all time and was the ultimate to bat for your life.Asif Iqbal is amongst the top 3-4 batsman ever at no 6 ,who played outstanding knocks against the great Australian and West Indies bowling attacks.In a crisis he was a champion.Vinoo Mankad conquered the likes of Lindwall and Miller with 2 centuries on Australian soil in 1947-48..He also scored a classical 184 at Lords and a double century against New Zealand at home.Tony Greig bated in cavalier style facing the lies of Thomson and Lillee and and was also prolific in the Carribean.Mushtaq Muhammad battled like a soldier against top Australian and West Indies bowling ,championing winning causes.Keith Miller was an entertainer supreme and was prolific in West Indies and Ashes series.Ian Botham at his best was close to an all-time great like when scoring an unbeaten 149 at Leeds in 1981 or 208 v India at the Oval in 1982.Ben Stokes was virtually a re-incarnated Ian Botham with as much prowess when the chips were down.Andrew Flintoff on his day could take a game away from the oposition.Kapil Dev was the hardest hitter.If he applied himself more would have been close to Sobers,considering his nascent talent.Imran Khan at his best,was a world-class batsman who may have made an test xi on the merits of his batting alone.


Asif may have averaged under 40 but if you asess the quality and si situation in which he scored his best innings,one would rate him morally a true great.Imran became a great batsman late in his career.Stokes faced lesser attacks than Botham,so rated below.

Edited by Harsh Thakor
Posted

Asif Iqbal with 53 wickets is a genuine all rounder? He was a batsman who could bowl a bit. Same was the case with Mushtaq Mohammed.

 

Ravi Ashwin should be on this list.

 

Keith Miller, Ben Stokes, Ian Botham, Imran and Kapil should be ranked higher.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

Asif Iqbal with 53 wickets is a genuine all rounder? He was a batsman who could bowl a bit. Same was the case with Mushtaq Mohammed.

 

Ravi Ashwin should be on this list.

 

Keith Miller, Ben Stokes, Ian Botham, Imran and Kapil should be ranked higher.

Remember Asif averaged 28 with the ball which is remarkable and the match-winning spells of Mushtaq,including West Indies.Asif originally made his place as a medium pace bowler taking prize scalps.

Posted
Remember Asif averaged 28 with the ball which is remarkable and the match-winning spells of Mushtaq,including West Indies.Asif originally made his place as a medium pace bowler taking prize scalps.
28 avg at that time was no big deal...almost everyone that rolled their arm avg below 30s back then. His strike rate of 74 and only 54 wickets in 57 test matches suggest he was not a genuine all rounder. In modern era he would not even get bowling. A terrific batsman no doubt but was not an all rounder.

Ranking him on all rounder list above Botham, Dev, Imran or Stokes is a joke.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Posted
15 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

28 avg at that time was no big deal...almost everyone that rolled their arm avg below 30s back then. His strike rate of 74 and only 54 wickets in 57 test matches suggest he was not a genuine all rounder. In modern era he would not even get bowling. A terrific batsman no doubt but was not an all rounder.

Ranking him on all rounder list above Botham, Dev, Imran or Stokes is a joke.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 

Only as a batsman -please see the title-Greatest batsman amongst allrounders

Posted
47 minutes ago, Harsh Thakor said:

This is my selection in order of merit of the 12 best batsman amongst the genuine allrounders.


1.Gary Sobers
2.Jacques Kallis
3.Asif Iqbal
4.Tony Greig
5.Vinoo Mankad
6.Mushtaq Muhammad
7.Keith Miller
8.Ian Botham
9.Ben Stokes
10.Andrew Flintoff
11.Kapil Dev
12.Imran Khan



Sobers staggering record and ability to pulverize attacks speaks for itself.Few batsman were er as complete.In terms of statistics Kallis was close to the best of all time and was the ultimate to bat for your life.Asif Iqbal is amongst the top 3-4 batsman ever at no 6 ,who played outstanding knocks against the great Australian and West Indies bowling attacks.In a crisis he was a champion.Vinoo Mankad conquered the likes of Lindwall and Miller with 2 centuries on Australian soil in 1947-48..He also scored a classical 184 at Lords and a double century against New Zealand at home.Tony Greig bated in cavalier style facing the lies of Thomson and Lillee and and was also prolific in the Carribean.Mushtaq Muhammad battled like a soldier against top Australian and West Indies bowling ,championing winning causes.Keith Miller was an entertainer supreme and was prolific in West Indies and Ashes series.Ian Botham at his best was close to an all-time great like when scoring an unbeaten 149 at Leeds in 1981 or 208 v India at the Oval in 1982.Ben Stokes was virtually a re-incarnated Ian Botham with as much prowess when the chips were down.Andrew Flintoff on his day could take a game away from the oposition.Kapil Dev was the hardest hitter.If he applied himself more would have been close to Sobers,considering his nascent talent.Imran Khan at his best,was a world-class batsman who may have made an test xi on the merits of his batting alone.


Asif may have averaged under 40 but if you asess the quality and si situation in which he scored his best innings,one would rate him morally a true great.Imran became a great batsman late in his career.Stokes faced lesser attacks than Botham,so rated below.

Ben Stokes as a batsman is third on that list .

Asif Iqbal may have been classified as an all rounder for Kent but not for Pakistan .He was someone who turned his arm over in tests same as Mudassar Nassar was and both have very similar figures batting and bowling . 

Also is Stokes still being classified as an all rounder ? In my day you had to participate in both disciplines and he has done very very little of the bowling discipline in last 2 years to still be classified as a " genuine all-rounder " 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Nikola said:

If Asif Iqbal is considered then why not steve waugh, carl hooper, hansie cronje, jayasuriya, tendulkar are added to this list?

You are correct on Steve Waugh.Sorry to have left him out.Appreciate.Hanse Cronje .Jayasuriya and Hooper almost there but Tendulkar hardly bowled in test cricket.

Posted

Sobers is seen as the best batsman after Bradman so if he is in a list, he is at #1 ... I had a thread on top ARs, where one of the criterias used was wkts taken > # of innings bowled in, therefore guys like Hammond could not make it 

 

Roughly:

 

1. Sobers 

2. Kallis

3. Stokes

4. Mankad - could bat anywhere. Has 100s in Aus and Eng as an opener iirc 

5. Botham (14 test 100s) 

 

Posted (edited)

Thread title says best batsmen...Wad kaali daal best batsmen in his era.  Thakur sir is so obsessed with kalli daal and his langoors ,no wonder if he has already recieved a Tamga E Imteyaz.

Edited by raki05

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...