Jump to content

Would you exchange Smith-Warner for Rohit-Kohli in all 3 formats


maniac

Would you exchange Smith-Warner for Ro-Ko?  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your answer?

    • In a heartbeat
    • No. Are you kidding me you Anti-National


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hell yeah eyes closed.  Warner will give a gun fielder over fatty Sharma.  A left hander as well.  Gun T20 ODI opener.  In test cricket will work everywhere except England. 

 

Smith vs Kohli isn't even a contest these days.  Give me even Ross Taylor over him. 

 

Posted (edited)

Why is Rohit auto-correcting to Rohit? :hitler:

 

 

Wait.... 

 

 

Oh come on mods I can't even say Nóhit now? :sheep:

 

 

Edited by Norman
Posted
18 minutes ago, speedheat said:

Sala Nöhit autocorrected to Rohit... Mods have lost their mind.

 

38 minutes ago, Norman said:

Why is Rohit auto-correcting to Rohit? :hitler:

 

 

Wait.... 

 

 

Oh come on mods I can't even say Nóhit now? :sheep:

 

 

LOL is ICF already on Rohit PR payroll :fear1:

 

Kohli became captain clueless, megalomaniac, captain wrongn, clown. Rohit will become ______

 

Fun times ahead :yay::aha:

Posted
50 minutes ago, Norman said:

 

Smith + Warner = 2 World Cups in 6 years

 

Chokohli + Rohit = 0 World Cups in 9 years

 

:hello:

 

Kohli + Rohit = 2 world cups and one champion trophy. 

Alongwith test series wins in Aus and draw /win in Eng. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Kohli + Rohit = 2 world cups and one champion trophy. 

 

That is not playing together (and neither of them were mainstays as individual players of the teams that won) 

Posted

Warner for tuk tuk Rohit is a no brainer

 

Smith for Kohli is tougher - Smith is the better test batsman but Kohli is way better in ODI and T20

Posted

1 T20I 100 vs  4 T20I 100’s

 

Highest T20 score of 100* vs 118 (joint fastest 100 in the history of T20)

 

highest score 178 vs highest score of 263 (3 200’s)

 

18 Odi 100’s vs 29 Odi 100’s

 

0 100’s in England vs almost 2 100’s in England

 

 

56 6’s in 86 tests vs 63 6’s in 43 tests

 

:hmmm: 

 

 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, maniac said:

 

 

:hmmm: 

 

 

 

 

Why are you posting stats when you said no stats in the OP? :hmmmm2:

Edited by zen
Posted
4 minutes ago, zen said:

 

 

Why are you posting stats when you said no stats in the OP? :hmmmm2:


stats shouldn’t be used to start an argument. It should be used to present a viewpoint in a debate. I provided some context there for people who have a recency bias or agenda :winky:

 

anyway yes no more stats :)

Posted
3 minutes ago, maniac said:


stats shouldn’t be used to start an argument. It should be used to present a viewpoint in a debate. I provided some context there for people who have a recency bias or agenda :winky:

 

anyway yes no more stats :)

 

Scoring a random 200 on a good day in a bilateral may not mean much to many :dontknow:

Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, zen said:

 

That is not playing together (and neither of them were mainstays as individual players of the teams that won) 

Doesn’t matter. India won wc , t20 wc & champion trophy with rohit & kohli as a player, also won 2 test series in aus, leading in Eng. how many test series smith & warner won in asia. Smith & warner didn’t win  a single test in Sri Lanka & uae . They couldn’t beat Bangladesh in Bangladesh 

Edited by kohli
Posted
Just now, kohli said:

Doesn’t matter. India won wc , t20 wc & champion trophy with rohit & kohli as a player, also won 2 test series in aus, leading in Eng. how many test series smith & warner won in asia. Smith & warner didn’t win  a single test in Sri Lanka & uae . They couldn’t beat Bangladesh in Bangalore.

 

It does to those that matter 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...