Jump to content

Bhanuka Rajapaksa vs Rishabh Pant


Majestic

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Lord said:

Pant is more talented and younger

 

but love Rajapaksa's fearless attitude

 

Only SKY has it in our team

Younger doesn't count much in T20s. Younger means fearless. You should be good enough to produce results at this level and not wait to become 28-29 year old to produce the odds.

Posted
Just now, Majestic said:

Younger doesn't count much in T20s. Younger means fearless. You should be good enough to produce results at this level and not wait to become 28-29 year old to produce the odds.

More time to improve :dontknow:

 

I'm sure Rajapaksa was nothing at 24

Posted

Maybe something for Indian middle order to learn in future :-

 

SL 58/5(9 overs)

SL 171/6(20 overs)

 

Wish India had a middle order who could help us save from this situation in a big match.

Posted
1 minute ago, Majestic said:

Maybe something for Indian middle order to learn in future :-

 

SL 58/5(9 overs)

SL 171/6(20 overs)

 

Wish India had a middle order who could help us save from this situation in a big match.

We'd aim for 140 straightaway after 58/5

Posted
26 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

But why comparing rajpaksha and pant. Pant is a wk bat. Rajpaksha is a specialist batsman.

They are comparable in T20s, left hander, aggressive batsman play in middle order.

 

Warner vs Buttler for example is a keeper vs batsman too but fair comparison in T20s.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Lord said:

We'd aim for 140 straightaway after 58/5

Thei bowlers can bat,infact most sides have bowlers who have the ability to spend time and tonk

This gives more assurance to the MO in such situations

Ours stay in continous scare of exposing the tail even in 18th over

Posted
11 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Thei bowlers can bat,infact most sides have bowlers who have the ability to spend time and tonk

This gives more assurance to the MO in such situations

Ours stay in continous scare of exposing the tail even in 18th over

That's also correct. All teams have batting till number 9-10. Ours have tailenders after number 6. Also we have highlhly inconsistent mo, as Dravid kept experimenting during biletral never defined the role made sky, Hooda and pant opener messed up their mind , played Karthik as finisher in all biletral and then in main event wiped out everything. Made kela opener, brought Kohli at first down , dropped dk and made Hooda bat at 7.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Vijy said:

raja(paksha) is better in T20s comfortably. however, raja is more experienced and has a better defined role.

Pant's has more or less been defined as middle order batsman

They tried him as opener to explore more

But even if he had succeeded there, Kela and Rohit were always your openers

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Pant's has more or less been defined as middle order batsman

They tried him as opener to explore more

But even if he had succeeded there, Kela and Rohit were always your openers

 

kelly (KL) needs to drop down. he sucks massively as opener. not saying bunt should play there either. try a slogger like shaw perhaps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...