Jump to content

Akashdeep


tweaker

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, tweaker said:

Akashdeep bowling at 140 k speeds

 

Better than likes of Prasidh, Navdeep Saini and many others as we had mentioned. We probably win the 1st Test if we had Akash Deep instead of Prasidh. In Eng's 1st innings in the 1st Test, the ball was moving with clouds overhead. Akash Deep would've made life hell for Eng batters. Instead we played useless Prasidh :facepalm:

Posted

Seam presentation :hatsoff:  THere is something called Test match length. He consistently hits that.  Crawley being taller and standing outside converted them into half vollies. Moment he was up against others that length worked.  He did not veer away from that length unlike prasdham

Posted

Simply magnificent is Akashdeep.

 

Replace Prasidh with Arshdeep.

 

Then we will have Arshdeep and Akashdeep bowling - confusing the Brit commentators as to which "deep" goes where!!

Posted
16 minutes ago, AKane said:

Simply magnificent is Akashdeep.

 

Replace Prasidh with Arshdeep.

 

Then we will have Arshdeep and Akashdeep bowling - confusing the Brit commentators as to which "deep" goes where!!

 

Add Kuldeep . 3deeps can throw them into a tizzy

Posted
5 hours ago, Lord said:

Was wonderful in BD home series. Then GG has dropped him randomly. Hope a long rope now 

He was sh!t in BGT.  Rightly dropped. Yes, he has taken 2 wickets so far.  But I think it's too early to judge him.  

Posted
6 hours ago, Lord said:

Then GG has dropped him randomly. Hope a long rope now 

He was dropped in NZ series because our *ing TM prepared turners & still picked 5 bowlers, 2 of them pacers  :facepalm:

Posted
51 minutes ago, Frustrated said:

He was sh!t in BGT.  Rightly dropped. Yes, he has taken 2 wickets so far.  But I think it's too early to judge him.  

No he was unlucky but bowled well

Posted
28 minutes ago, Sooda said:

Surprised us all it's fair to say 

Length was key and he got it full enough 

As long as the ball swings or nibbles off the pitch, his length will be ideal... 

Posted
1 hour ago, Adamant said:

Bowled well, but still not at the same level as he did in his debut match, he was bowling 140 and  obtaining proper seam movement, needs.

 

I was so freaking impressed by his debut, hopefully he gets back to that rhythm.

Even if he could do that , it probably won't happen if we keep giving him 7 over spells. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Adamant said:

Bowled well, but still not at the same level as he did in his debut match, he was bowling 140 and  obtaining proper seam movement, needs.

 

He was consistently hitting 140 yesterday as well. He stuck to his discipline which is the requirement in these conditions. The wicket is still flat and there is no seam movement available.

Posted
5 hours ago, Adamant said:

Bowled well, but still not at the same level as he did in his debut match, he was bowling 140 and  obtaining proper seam movement, needs.

 

I was so freaking impressed by his debut, hopefully he gets back to that rhythm.

 

3 hours ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Even if he could do that , it probably won't happen if we keep giving him 7 over spells. 

 

 

Akashdeep bowled 3 to 4 balls at 140 k +  in all of his 7 overs bowled in one continuous spell.

 

Atleast 2 balls at 143 k+.

 

Only 1 ball below 137 k.

 

Wicket balls were 140 k and 141 k.

 

7th over was as quick with him touching 143 k and 142 k.

 

Plus he hit the pitch hard and got consistent zip and seam movement from his over 2.

 

Hit greats lengths from his over 2  too 

 

Just needs to improve his lines a bit.

Posted
30 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

 

Akashdeep bowled 3 to 4 balls at 140 k +  in all of his 7 overs bowled in one continuous spell.

 

Atleast 2 balls at 143 k+.

 

Only 1 ball below 137 k.

 

Wicket balls were 140 k and 141 k.

 

7th over was as quick with him touching 143 k and 142 k.

 

Plus he hit the pitch hard and got consistent zip and seam movement from his over 2.

 

Hit greats lengths from his over 2  too 

 

Just needs to improve his lines a bit.

Doesn't mean he should be bowling such long spells , to be honest. 

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Doesn't mean he should be bowling such long spells , to be honest. 

 

He should not.

 

Akashdeep is bowling 133 k to 138 k so far today and looks a bit stiff.

 

5 over spells max for 140 k pacers.

Edited by express bowling

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...