Jump to content

Indian Squad announced for SL tour


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Lone Wolf said:

Samson should be no 1 choice in T20 format.  Pant has had enough chances.

I don't mind Pant in ODI format for time being.  Maybe he will do well in middle overs against spin

 

 

Has to improve keeping big time for that. Pant actually kept really well in WT20 

 

I'd look to back Jurel and maybe bring back Kishan

Posted (edited)

As per continuity and team management:

 

ODI 11 Vs SL:

 

Rohit (C)

Gill

Kohli

S Iyer

KL (WK)

Axar

Sundar

Rana

Kuldeep Yadav

Arshdeep

Siraj

 

T20 11 Vs SL:

 

Gill (C)

Jaiswal

Pant (WK)

SKY

Dube

H Pandya

Axar

Sundar

Arshdeep

Bishnoi

Siraj

 

Edited by Prabhdeep Singh
Posted
43 minutes ago, Prabhdeep Singh said:

As per continuity and team management:

 

ODI 11 Vs SL:

 

Rohit (C)

Gill

Kohli

S Iyer

KL (WK)

Axar

Sundar

Rana

Kuldeep Yadav

Arshdeep

Siraj

 

T20 11 Vs SL:

 

Gill (C)

Jaiswal

Pant (WK)

SKY

Dube

H Pandya

Axar

Sundar

Arshdeep

Bishnoi

Siraj

 

 

Sky is the captain and Gill is the VC dude

Posted

Pandya recently asked for leave from SL ODIs, also announced divorce today. Clearly not in the right mental space for last few months, even that IPL controversy. Ok to not burden him with captaincy, also there is the issue of fitness. 

Posted
1 hour ago, raki05 said:

What doesn’t explain is reselection of kela after his horrendous performance in final. Even Goenka is going to kick him out and we are garlanding him for another screwing up which he may deliver in ct25.

They talk big when they are just normal beings

Moment they step into some influential position they start boozing

Agarkar looks totally out

Posted
17 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

No Kishan please... He hasn't improved.  He is Dube with lesser power but better timing.

 

Keeper options are very limited. Jurel looks the best

Posted

I am just feeling extremely frustrated with Gill...first this guy pushed Abhishek Sharma to number 3..and played zimbaber cricket..to ensure his stats..and then now got him removed from SL T20s..and himself become VC..

 

I am fine for Gill in ODIs and Tests to some extent but has he taken T20s by the storm..why he is being preferred over a firey talent like Abhishek..Jswal and Abhishek could have been a fearful opening pair if they performed to their potential..

Sharma should have been given 10 T20 matches in opening before making a judgement on him..

do you want to win next t2o cup or not..

 

fookers..

Posted
13 minutes ago, Need4Speed said:

I am just feeling extremely frustrated with Gill...first this guy pushed Abhishek Sharma to number 3..and played zimbaber cricket..to ensure his stats..and then now got him removed from SL T20s..and himself become VC..

 

I am fine for Gill in ODIs and Tests to some extent but has he taken T20s by the storm..why he is being preferred over a firey talent like Abhishek..Jswal and Abhishek could have been a fearful opening pair if they performed to their potential..

Sharma should have been given 10 T20 matches in opening before making a judgement on him..

do you want to win next t2o cup or not..

 

fookers..

agarkar /gg /selectors know this well that abhishek is an ideal batsman for T20 and odi's, Gill is not the best fit for a T20 and if he starts playing these reckless dangerous hack shots like SKY , his technique for tests will go for a toss. 

whats the point of playing a technically sound copy book batsman ahead of a guy who was beating Head in IPL and scoring runs at max strike rate.  

GILL should be in 11 for tests and ODI's and not picked for t20"s.

Harshit got lucky as Hardik dropped himself else hardik would have played in ODI's.

DUbe fits into T20 but is he a genuine all rounder who can bowl 5 to 6 overs in ODI. i would target him and score more runs as he is a WEAK bowler and DEFINITELY not some one to be played in an INDIAN ODI 11.

 

Posted (edited)

Poor selections...

 

T20Is: No Abhishek, no Harshit, Siraj selected when he's not a T20 bowler

 

ODIs: No Jaiswal, no Rinku, and KL Rahul the panauti back. Plus Dube in for absolutely no reason other than that he plays for CSK. Prefer Venkatesh Iyer instead but looks like players from certain franchises are more "equal" than others :((

 

We deserve to under-perform at intl level with such myopic selections. Dropping Abhishek after a 40 ball 100, and no Jaiswal in ODIs when he's a shoo in Tests & T20s, and ideally suited for ODIs :wall:

Edited by Ultimate_Game
Posted

Dropping Abhishek makes no sense. Not that I think he is going to be great but after what he has done in last tour he should have played here.

 

I maybe in a minority, the more Abhishek plays, the more he is going to be found out. I hope I am wrong in my assessment.

Posted
9 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Dropping Abhishek makes no sense. Not that I think he is going to be great but after what he has done in last tour he should have played here.

 

I maybe in a minority, the more Abhishek plays, the more he is going to be found out. I hope I am wrong in my assessment.

 

We already know what you think of Indian youngsters based on your thread taking shots at them after the 1st Zim T20I and then going missing after they made you eat your words :giggle:

Posted

I don't understand the logic of Gambhir asking Rohit and Kohli to play odis.It could have been used to let youngsters play.

 

It does not make any difference if they score 3 100s or 3 zeros. They both wil be fine for CT as they will be playing lot of tests.

Posted
22 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I don't understand the logic of Gambhir asking Rohit and Kohli to play odis.It could have been used to let youngsters play.

 

 

We have just 6 ODIs before CT.

 

And Rohit & Kohli haven't played ODIs in while. Since they are sure-shot in CT, it is preferable that they play all the 6 ODIs from now on.

 

Youngster batters can be tried in T20Is with the T20 WC 2 years away. 

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

We have just 6 ODIs before CT.

 

And Rohit & Kohli haven't played ODIs in while. Since they are sure-shot in CT, it is preferable that they play all the 6 ODIs from now on.

 

Youngster batters can be tried in T20Is with the T20 WC 2 years away. 

Do you really think they need to play odis to get into grove for CT. 

 

 I can understand t20s but odis, I don't think there is any need but anyways it will be interesting to see how they gel under Gambhir.

 

 

On side note Jaiswal should be playing all three formats.

Edited by putrevus

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...