Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 3/1/2025 at 11:24 AM, bharathh said:

 

I have now come to the conclusion Usha Vance is a textbook ABCD girl. Hates Indians and loves to portray herself as whiter than white and more American than anyone else. Probably agrees with everything that her redneck husband says and is more feral than him about Indians and how third world we are.

 

Sure

 

https://x.com/Lucineh_K/status/1895672943101034840?t=hY3LSuspFN73btX4hz98cw&s=19

Posted
5 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Zelensky performed admirably.

 

Vance lecturing him about being thankful was just cringe.

Hahaha. Yes calling vice president funking bitch is performing well for a nazi. 

Posted
10 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Whatever dude.

Ofcourse, it's whatever when citable evidence goes against you. Next time don't send a cocaine addict in bouncer dress who swears at hosts. 

Posted

Looks like UK gave Ukraine 3 Billion Euros to continue the war. So Trump was right when he said to Zelensky that hat you want world war 3

Posted
1 hour ago, mishra said:

Looks like UK gave Ukraine 3 Billion Euros to continue the war. So Trump was right when he said to Zelensky that hat you want world war 3

How does Zelensky want WW3?

 

His country was invaded.

 

Russia also invaded some part of Ukraine a decade ago when Zelensky was not even the leader.

 

US may have a point in not wanting to fund the war etc, but that doesn't change who is guilty of starting the war.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

How does Zelensky want WW3?

 

His country was invaded.

 

Russia also invaded some part of Ukraine a decade ago when Zelensky was not even the leader.

 

US may have a point in not wanting to fund the war etc, but that doesn't change who is guilty of starting the war.

 

Aap chronology samjhe Madam. Saal tha 2006. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Mariyam said:

How does Zelensky want WW3?

 

His country was invaded.

 

Russia also invaded some part of Ukraine a decade ago when Zelensky was not even the leader.

 

US may have a point in not wanting to fund the war etc, but that doesn't change who is guilty of starting the war.

Even now.

 

Fact 1: EU+Zelensky says he wants to be part of NATO else Russia will keep attacking them.

Fact 2: Poland will be next in line if war ends without Ukraine in NATO, as per EU+Zelensky.

While Fact 3: if being in NATo gives security, Isn’t Poland already part of NATO? 
 

Means EU wants US to fund their war with Russia via Ukraine. All they could shell out is meagre 2 billion Euro loan. Read again “LOAN”

Posted (edited)

^ What it means is EU wants NATO to grow while Russia wants Status quo. And NATO has grown even further since Russia war strated

Edited by mishra
Posted

What needs to happen:

 

Immediate ceasefire with 200k troops to enforce it.

 

Unfortunately, ukraine has lost these territories for the forseable future. Price you pay for giving up nukes. Ultimately its Bill Clinton who is the biggest reason ukraine fell pray to russia. 

 

 

How this is achieved: Europe needs to cut their welfare budgets and build their armies. For 2 decades Europe has degraded their armies. So in a 10 year period Europe needs to pay the usa some 50 billion a year for security while its armies are rebuilt before fully taking over. I read if Europe cuts welfare budgets by 10% it will generate some 150 billion usd which over the next decade makes Europe a good fighting force. Technology is not an issue.  Key barrier is political capital of those 10% welfare cuts. 

 

 

Truth is Zelenskyy soft sided with the dems and is paying the price. Should step down for the greater good. While he was ambushed in DC, should have sucked it up. The more he keeps meeting people the more territory Russia gains. Most agree that Russia is slowly gaining an edge which cannot be repealed. Dragging this one out is not ideal. Ukraine does not have the man power.

Posted
13 hours ago, Mariyam said:

How does Zelensky want WW3?

 

His country was invaded.

 

Russia also invaded some part of Ukraine a decade ago when Zelensky was not even the leader.

 

US may have a point in not wanting to fund the war etc, but that doesn't change who is guilty of starting the war.

 

You don't argue. Sabka yahaan pe Rajnath Singh ke saath roj uthna baithna hota hain.

Posted
12 minutes ago, MechEng said:

 

You don't argue. Sabka yahaan pe Rajnath Singh ke saath roj uthna baithna hota hain.

off topic: what happened to your paper on non-cooperative game theory?

×
×
  • Create New...