Jump to content

Rohit Sharma Becomes Oldest Ever Number 1 Batter In ICC Rankings


Recommended Posts

Posted

Four days after being adjudged Player of the Series against Australia, Rohit, the ‘Hitman’, finds himself ranked as the No. 1 batter in Men’s ODIs for the first time in an illustrious career.

And that has come at the age of 38 years and 182 days, making the former captain the oldest world No. 1 in the game’s 50-over format.

Rohit dethroned current India Test and ODI captain Shubman Gill at the top. Interestingly, the ‘Hitman’ replaced another fellow-Indian as the oldest numero uno ODI batter. Batting legend Sachin Tendulkar had held that record so long, having been ranked No. 1 batter in ODIs at the age of 38 years and 73 days back in 2011.

 

:clap:

Posted
1 minute ago, putrevus said:

Says it all about Rohit'career. Even in his best format, he never could dominate.

Naah he was not no 1 due to Kohli.

 

His ODI and T20 careers have been great.

Posted
1 hour ago, Cloud9 said:

Rohit really underachieved in tests despite all the talent he had. I feel bad for it. 

Yeah never took off with the Kohli-Puajra-Rahane trio.

 

Surprisingly when they started sucking post covid, Rohit became really good for 3-4 years.

 

At leas he had something of a test career and some great knocks at the Oval, Chennai, Nagpur.

Posted

Rohit still has that power and timing game to tonk sixes and fours. NRI can only hit a few lucky 4s. He can rotate strike at run a ball but had lost the ability to hit 4s

Posted
21 minutes ago, nitinbwj said:

Rohit still has that power and timing game to tonk sixes and fours. NRI can only hit a few lucky 4s. He can rotate strike at run a ball but had lost the ability to hit 4s

 

Comparatively Rohit is a touch player through and through. That is why you could still simialr timing which you could see 15 years back.  Kohli is known for going at the ball with hard hands.

Posted (edited)

Considering he did not maximise his Test Career, he still scored 12 test 100’s all in wins, he played a lot fewer matches than his contemporaries.

 

To put things into perspective, his contemporaries in terms of match winning test 100’s:

 

Kohli 14/30 test 100’s in wins

Pujara 13/19 test 100’s in wins

Rahane 9/12 test 100’s in wins

 

If you are really honest, only his last 8 test matches were bad from September 2024 since he started opening in October 2019. He got clubbed with Virat who had been bad for 5 years in test cricket. Rohit’s average declined sharply from 45 to 40 during this phase.

 

Even to this day he is the best batsman to watch when in full flow.

 

I believe Rohit should start playing Ranji and make a play to return to test side on the basis of scoring runs in Ranji. If he is going to keep him self active until 2027 playing only 1 format is not ideal. Might as well pursue tests also until 2027.

 

Edited by Prabhdeep Singh
Posted
2 hours ago, deathmonger said:

Naah he was not no 1 due to Kohli.

 

His ODI and T20 careers have been great.

Odi he has been great, t20s he he has been liability in t20 world cups till 2024.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Odi he has been great, t20s he he has been liability in t20 world cups till 2024.

 

 

He has two t20 wcs - the most by any player tied with a few West Indians and played key roles in both

Posted
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

Rohit was also was the reason for India not winning in 2014, 2016 and as a captain in 2022 semi when he opened and batted under 100 SR.

 

 

No one wins everything.

 

Even Starc, Cummins etc failed in the 2019 semi vs England, 2025 WTC final, many T20 WCs etc.

Posted
12 hours ago, putrevus said:

Says it all about Rohit'career. Even in his best format, he never could dominate.

White ball rankings are a joke. 

 

Babar Azam has been ODI number 1 batsman for more weeks than Rohit, Ponting, Dhoni, Hussey, Gilchrist etc. When did he dominate? What is his equivalent of Rohit's 2019 WC campaign?

 

Likewise is Shaheen more dominant than McGrath, Donald, Akram?

 

Only test rankings are legit because teams always field their first choice players and play with intensity. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...