Jump to content

Conditions here right for me: Ishant


Recommended Posts

Posted
Sir Ravindra Jadeja (@SirJadeja) tweeted at 11:16 PM on Thu, Jun 06, 2013: Air in a sealed packet of Lays is of more use than Ishant Sharma in Indian bowling attack. #IndVsSA
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Is this official twitter?
Posted
Sir Ravindra Jadeja (@SirJadeja) tweeted at 11:16 PM on Thu, Jun 06, 2013: Air in a sealed packet of Lays is of more use than Ishant Sharma in Indian bowling attack. #IndVsSA
:hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Is this official twitter?
no Sir was playing
Posted

Great....Today since Rohit performed,all the hate mongers have turned their focus to Ishant....He bowled badly yes but the guy took 2 wickets as well,wasnt the end of the world performacne as it is made out to be...:banghead: Cant we enjoy a win without insulting a plauer

Posted
Great....Today since Rohit performed,all the hate mongers have turned their focus to Ishant....He bowled badly yes but the guy took 2 wickets as well,wasnt the end of the world performacne as it is made out to be...:banghead: Cant we enjoy a win without insulting a plauer
:srh: zindabad
Posted

So Yadav gives 75 in 10 and takes 2 wickets, its ok, pitch was flat. Ishant gives 66 in 8, takes 2 wickets, get him out of the team!! Were the two bowling on different pitches? On a flattish pitch, 3rd seamer will always have more chances of getting hit then the new ball bowlers. One thing Ishant needs to avoid is to bowl short and give width. Needs to pitch it up like he was doing in the IPL and he will bowl better.

Posted
Severe question marks on the intelligence of our fast bowlers. I mean really' date=' at times it is 3 Ajit Agarkars on the field.[/quote'] Even at his current age and with his own mediocrity, Tenth Avatar of Vishnu >>>>> Ishant crappy Sharma 82dbcec6d22622c3d8f7a9bf1f2cd647_ls_lt.jpg
Posted

was feeding short and length balls to mclaren ball after ball. screwed up the NRR. no intelligence. yadav tries to bowl full and bhuvi also tries yorkers. would give chance to vinay over him

Posted
So Yadav gives 75 in 10 and takes 2 wickets, its ok, pitch was flat. Ishant gives 66 in 8, takes 2 wickets, get him out of the team!! Were the two bowling on different pitches? On a flattish pitch, 3rd seamer will always have more chances of getting hit then the new ball bowlers. One thing Ishant needs to avoid is to bowl short and give width. Needs to pitch it up like he was doing in the IPL and he will bowl better.
Yadav was bowling inside the powerplay overs. Yadav's wickets were Amla and AB Ishant was primarily bowling outside the powerplays and got the wickets of Faf and Kleindvelt (bowled only 2 overs in the power plays) despite all this Yadav was less expensive than Ishant.
Posted

Isuck Sharma is the biggest imposter in cricket. No brains No intelligence Limited ability Worst stats in limited over cricket Learnt NOTHING in all his years playing the game. He is only getting in the team due to favours or contacts. Based on merit should have been axed years ago.

Posted
Yadav was bowling inside the powerplay overs. Yadav's wickets were Amla and AB Ishant was primarily bowling outside the powerplays and got the wickets of Faf and Kleindvelt (bowled only 2 overs in the power plays) despite all this Yadav was less expensive than Ishant.
this.. people need to see match and stop comparing based on stats.. yadav even at death where ishant leaked so many runs did well gaveo ne boundary but rest of over was good,,
Posted
Isuck Sharma is the biggest imposter in cricket. No brains No intelligence Limited ability Worst stats in limited over cricket Learnt NOTHING in all his years playing the game. He is only getting in the team due to favours or contacts. Based on merit should have been axed years ago.
+1 I Shan't Bowl right Sharma is GREATEST DUD bowler India has ever produced and Dhoni + Selectors are even greater duds to keep selecting him. I could understand in 80s/70s when India kept selecting Madan lal due to dearth of fast bowlers ...but now with so many options, they still keep going back to this worthless Piece of S***. Whose only thing CONSISTENT is his HAIR length.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...