Jump to content

Do we need to witness *this pos* SL team do a Historic First Ever win on Indian soil?


fineleg

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Do we need to witness *this pos* SL team do a Historic First Ever win on Indian soil?

Will Indian players rise up to perform and prevent this glorious thing from happening!?

Edited by fineleg
Posted (edited)

Actually we don't have much time left in the match to force a result for Indian victory unless we get a heap of wickets on the 4th morning. If Sri Lanka can survive up to an hour in the post-lunch session with a lead of 100 runs, it is curtains for Indian victory. However, India can likely pull a draw by scoring a 350ish in second innings by the tea of day 5 and bat Sri Lanka out of the match. 

Edited by sarcastic
Posted
8 minutes ago, flat_wicket_bully said:

I think Murali record in India is as bad as herath and he averages something like 47

Haven't checked Muralis stats in India. But yes , if that is 47 in India, then it is bad. Certainly not fits for the world class bowler he was. But then even Warnie struggled against us. 

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

Haven't checked Muralis stats in India. But yes , if that is 47 in India, then it is bad. Certainly not fits for the world class bowler he was. But then even Warnie struggled against us. 

Irony is that some lallus like Udal, Panesar, Price, O Keefe have shocked us here but the 2 GOAT contenders  Murali and Warne both struggled. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted
Just now, Gollum said:

Irony is that some lallus like Udal, Panesar, Price, O Keefe have shocked us here but the 2 GOAT contenders  Murali and Warne struggled. 

Michael Clarke took 6 for 9 at Mumbai. Udal too bowled some career best spells he has ever bowled.

Monty and Swann bowled the most superb bowling spells in tandem in India in 2011.

It happens with almost every batsman or bowler that there will be one or couple of countries where they are below average even though they have been exceptional players.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Gollum said:

Not happening, we will at worst win 2-1 or 1-0. I am more inclined towards 2-0. 

2-1 means SL has one test win. That's what we are talking about here. So far, in history, SL has not won a single Test match in India. It will be historical if that ever happens in this series.

Edited by fineleg
Posted
22 minutes ago, fineleg said:

2-1 means SL has one test win. That's what we are talking about here. So far, in history, SL has not won a single Test match in India. It will be historical if that ever happens in this series.

Sorry I misread it as series win for Lanka.  

Posted (edited)

It is just a game, not war. Whoever plays better wins. If SL win this game, they will be desrved winners. You can fluke a T20 or ODI win but not a test match win.

 

Edited by nevada
Posted
11 hours ago, fineleg said:

Do we need to witness *this pos* SL team do a Historic First Ever win on Indian soil?

Will Indian players rise up to perform and prevent this glorious thing from happening!?

Pathetic post.

Posted
8 hours ago, fineleg said:

2-1 means SL has one test win. That's what we are talking about here. So far, in history, SL has not won a single Test match in India. It will be historical if that ever happens in this series.

:mama:

Posted
12 hours ago, Straight Drive said:

I am surprised by this stat. Really tough to beleive they could not even win one test match in India with Mahela, Sanga, Murali. Shows how bad the remaining players must have performed on their tours over here.

even Sanga, Mahela, murli did not perform

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...