Jump to content

Best Test Batsman of 2017


Recommended Posts

Posted
Most runs
Player Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s
CA Pujara (INDIA) 11 18 1 1140 202 67.05 2484 45.89 4 5 1 115 2
SPD Smith (AUS) 10 18 2 1127 239 70.43 2142 52.61 5 2 0 126 2
D Elgar (SA) 11 20 0 1097 199 54.85 2162 50.74 5 4 1 138 3
V Kohli (INDIA) 10 16 2 1059 243 75.64 1389 76.24 5 1 2 97 6
FDM Karunaratne (SL) 13 26 0 1031 196 39.65 2304 44.74 3 4 2 91 2
LD Chandimal (SL) 12 24 2 1003 164 45.59 2235 44.87 3 5 1 102 4
HM Amla (SA) 11 20 1 942 137 49.57 1733 54.35 3 4 1 129 4
JE Root (ENG) 10 18 0 905 190 50.27 1430 63.28 2 7 0 131 1
DA Warner (AUS) 10 19 1 808 123 44.88 1188 68.01 3 3 0 94 6
SD Hope (WI) 10 19 2 773 147 45.47 1802 42.89 2 3 1 96 3
N Dickwella (SL) 11 22 2 773 83 38.65 1031 74.97 0 6 1 87 6
Mushfiqur Rahim (BDESH) 8 16 2 766 159 54.71 1602 47.81 2 3 0 80 7
RL Chase (WI) 10 19 2 740 131 43.52 1501 49.30 2 4 1 86 4
F du Plessis (SA) 10 17 4 706 135* 54.30 1265 55.81 1 6 1 90 2
KC Brathwaite (WI) 10 19 0 706 134 37.15 1734 40.71 1 4 2 69 6
BKG Mendis (SL) 10 20 0 669 194 33.45 1161 57.62 2 1 1 77 7
Posted

Gotta be Smith or Pujara (duh) but Rahul's performance against Australia was the most impressive in a series context. Honorable mention to Shai Hope for his twin hundreds in England and 90 odd against PAK in a winning cause.

Posted
1 hour ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

Gotta be Smith or Pujara (duh) but Rahul's performance against Australia was the most impressive in a series context. Honorable mention to Shai Hope for his twin hundreds in England and 90 odd against PAK in a winning cause.

i'd opt for smith.

Posted
Just now, Austin 3:!6 said:

Smith scores 3 centuries in India - Greatest batting feat of all time.

Kohli scores 4 centuries in Australia - Flat decks

 

:giggle:

Are you seriously comparing these 2 sets of pitches? I mean seriously?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Are you seriously comparing these 2 sets of pitches? I mean seriously?

Why cant I? :hmmm:

Look at the way England struggling in Aussie land. That was one heck of a series by Kohli against a better attack of Starc, Johnson,Harris and Llyon. But we Indians dont like to give credit.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

Smith scores 3 centuries in India - Greatest batting feat of all time.

Kohli scores 4 centuries in Australia - Flat decks

 

:giggle:

Smith also scored 4 centuries (or 5?) in that same tour, and the pitches were very flat. In contrast, Smith scored more runs in a single innings than Kohli did in "home" conditions. I think Smith must have scored about 10 times as many runs as the "great" Kohli even though latter had home advantage. Besides, Lyon + O'Keefe is lesser than Ashwin + Jaddu.

 

I don't know if Smith's series is among "greatest of all time", but it certainly ranks among greatest of 21st century along with Lara against Murali and Vaas.

Edited by Vijy
Posted
2 hours ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

Why cant I? :hmmm:

Look at the way England struggling in Aussie land. That was one heck of a series by Kohli against a better attack of Starc, Johnson,Harris and Llyon. But we Indians dont like to give credit.

 

 

 

 

 

Dude seriously? Smith got 800 runs in that series, VK close to 700, Warner had 3 100s :facepalm:, Vijay, Rahane all feasted. 500s were being scored for fun, not once were we close to getting 20 wickets. Only Brisbane was a somewhat challenging pitch and Kohli failed in both innings (no surprise there), Vijay's 140 there was all class btw. 

Posted

I would hold a gun to temple of the person who answer anyone sans smith. That guy is on something, we are lucky to witness a potential statistical anamoly in our lifetime. 

Posted

Rankings should be by batting averages of batters   and bowling averages or bowling strike rates or wickets per match for bowlers

 

And even then,  just stats don't carry much meaning

 

This year, I have been most impressed by KL Rahul among Indian batters because he has scored runs most consistently in difficult conditions

Posted
23 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Rankings should be by batting averages of batters   and bowling averages or bowling strike rates or wickets per match for bowlers

 

And even then,  just stats don't carry much meaning

 

This year, I have been most impressed by KL Rahul among Indian batters because he has scored runs most consistently in difficult conditions

among indians, it should be a toss-up between klr and chepu, with ftb kohli coming next.

Posted
12 hours ago, Vijy said:

Smith also scored 4 centuries (or 5?) in that same tour, and the pitches were very flat. In contrast, Smith scored more runs in a single innings than Kohli did in "home" conditions. I think Smith must have scored about 10 times as many runs as the "great" Kohli even though latter had home advantage. Besides, Lyon + O'Keefe is lesser than Ashwin + Jaddu.

 

I don't know if Smith's series is among "greatest of all time", but it certainly ranks among greatest of 21st century along with Lara against Murali and Vaas.

Rank turners neutralized Ashwin and Jadeja. Lyon is as good as Ashwin and Jadeja in any condition, tbh.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...