Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Pollack said:

Dude if he is getting selected in team continously he is going to do well in some matches. In any case the point of argument was not whether he was backed or not after all jadeja was playing every match without bowling or batting. You made a point that he is giving confidence to Jadeja for greater good of India at the expense of CSK which is crap. Jadeja doing good (not even outstanding) in two or three matches of 14 matches to be played total isn't anything special. Play even Joginder Sharma for all 14 matches he will too do good in a few. 

i never said greater good of india, its only good for CSK

The idea is to give player confidence in whole tournament coz ull need every at some point of time .

 

Posted
2 hours ago, sensible-indian said:

No low is too low for Kohli.

 

Worst captain.

Fear the worst with this moron in charge. We may lose the streak against Pak under him, and forget about any title chances in the next few ICC events.

Posted (edited)

Cant find any other relevant thread so will post here. 

 

Williamson's move in the 18th over to give the ball to Brathwaite caused the loss. 

 

The moment i saw Brathwaite, i knew CSK can be back. And that guy ended up bowling pies in the arc. :hysterical:

 

Unbelievably stupid move. Should have bowled bhuvi, kaul and then sandeep.

Edited by sensible-indian
Posted
5 hours ago, sensible-indian said:

Cant find any other relevant thread so will post here. 

 

Williamson's move in the 18th over to give the ball to Brathwaite caused the loss. 

 

The moment i saw Brathwaite, i knew CSK can be back. And that guy ended up bowling pies in the arc. :hysterical:

 

Unbelievably stupid move. Should have bowled bhuvi, kaul and then sandeep.

yep he should have bowled bhuvi in that over,totally inane move 

Posted
3 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

yep he should have bowled bhuvi in that over,totally inane move 

Fauf was going to go after any bowler. Their moves were good. Where the miscalculated was unexpected batting skills of Shardul Thakur. You really think someone liek Markhende could have pulled off what Thakur did?

Posted
On 5/5/2018 at 11:32 PM, Ankit_sharma03 said:

i never said greater good of india, its only good for CSK

The idea is to give player confidence in whole tournament coz ull need every at some point of time .

 

@Pollack- see makes sense now

Posted
38 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Fauf was going to go after any bowler. Their moves were good. Where the miscalculated was unexpected batting skills of Shardul Thakur. You really think someone liek Markhende could have pulled off what Thakur did?

bhuvi would have been difficult to hit , when bhuvi had only 6 runs to defend,the match was as good as gone

Posted
2 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

bhuvi would have been difficult to hit , when bhuvi had only 6 runs to defend,the match was as good as gone

Fauf was in the zone. He smashed Bhuvi for a six in the end. CSK had just 2 wickets in hand with Bhuvi and Kaul to bowl. All they had to do was bowl 3 or 4 dot balls to Thakur

Posted
3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Fauf was in the zone. He smashed Bhuvi for a six in the end. CSK had just 2 wickets in hand with Bhuvi and Kaul to bowl. All they had to do was bowl 3 or 4 dot balls to Thakur

faf found it difficult to hit an over before that , bhuvi is world class,now way he would have been smashed like a braithwaite,it was a tactical blunder

Posted
Just now, SK_IH said:

faf found it difficult to hit an over before that , bhuvi is world class,now way he would have been smashed like a braithwaite,it was a tactical blunder

He could have smashed Brathwhite or Sandeep in the last over. Bhaji might have connected a few against Bhuvi. You never know.

Posted
4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

He could have smashed Brathwhite or Sandeep in the last over. Bhaji might have connected a few against Bhuvi. You never know.

last over pressure is different, in last 4 overs of the inning one should never take chances with mediocre bowlers, 20 runs over changes the games, i remember it was corey anderson vs rcb , even if your best bowler goes for runs it doesnt matter atleast he is your best option

Posted

Carlos move made sense. He gave less than 6 rpo before his over. His or Kaul wouldn't matter at that time. What Kane missed was not bowling Bhuvi in the 19th. He would have been against Thakur. If he could have picked a wicket or conceded around 8 runs or something. Kaul/Sandeep anyone would have fancied defending around 15 in the last over. Kaul was kind of a mistake but again who would have thought Thakur would end up with three boundaries in that over.

Posted
6 hours ago, Sonix768 said:

Carlos move made sense. He gave less than 6 rpo before his over. His or Kaul wouldn't matter at that time. What Kane missed was not bowling Bhuvi in the 19th. He would have been against Thakur. If he could have picked a wicket or conceded around 8 runs or something. Kaul/Sandeep anyone would have fancied defending around 15 in the last over. Kaul was kind of a mistake but again who would have thought Thakur would end up with three boundaries in that over.

Actually Kaul was better than Bhuvi in the match. He was landing his yorkers perfectly. Even he bowled very well to Thakur. But nobody expected how Thakur was able to manuoever the ball except the 2nd ball. First ball was intentional. But it was lucky it went between the slip and keeper. He connected all the balls very well in that over. Let us not forget how Vijay shankar struggled against Fiz not long ago in the end overs.  

Posted

After MSD abdication, virat is the chief captain and Rohit -ashwin are the lieutenants. 

 

All three of them failed to make it to the elimination rounds signifying a total failure in the capacity of Indian leadership.

 

#fact.

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Temujin Khaghan said:

Surprisingly DK is maintaining a cool temper as a leader even in trying circumstances.

Experience of captaining domestic side helps a lot. So no surprise there.

×
×
  • Create New...