Jump to content

This team needs proper no 6 batsman


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Sgattick10 said:

Lmao. The guy couldnt put bat to ball in SL :cantstop:

that was t20 format, shankar game is ideal for test cricket

Even siraj struggled in test cricket but taking bunch in A-games

 

Shankar is injured currently

Posted
1 minute ago, Sgattick10 said:

Alright if he has good technique and temparament we can try him as an opener too in tests. Our openers dont do much in overseas anyway.

he is not an opener

Mazak hai kya kisiko bhi open krwa do 

Shaw, mayank gadhe hai jo domestic, A games men run bna rhe hai bhar bhar ke

Posted
16 minutes ago, Sgattick10 said:

Lmao. The guy couldnt put bat to ball in SL :cantstop:

T20 's vs tests. Different format different pitch different boundary dimensions batspeed bowling restrictions.. Line length totally different games. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Sgattick10 said:

Alright if he has good technique and temparament we can try him as an opener too in tests. Our openers dont do much in overseas anyway.

He will get binary digits if he faced new balls for that you need openers. 

Posted
2 hours ago, wanted_desi said:

I think its time to invest in part time spinner, who can bat at #6. Play with 4 proper fast bowlers. Is there anyone in Domestic circuits? 

JAYANT YADAV....that guy did very well with the bat against England in India. Not to be seen since then. So pathetic that he was discarded...his batting alone would have saved us..hell even Bhuvi would have been very good. Now that I think of it, Rahane scorws century in England cuz bhuvi was batting nicely at the other end....like I said...without someone one to support him he won't do jack. 

Posted

No we dnt 

We need an all rounder at 6th position, None of our batsman bowls and when u hve bwoelr who clock 140K + its important to give them few overs breather . Last game when ashwin was injured had pandya not been their we cud have been in trouble n lets not forget when zak broke in 2011, u cnt jst go with only 4 bowlers 

We have pant who is a good enough batsman, Ashwin n bhuvi in lower order are very capable as well

 

6th batsman is a defensive strategy , the problem is 4 out of 5 batsman is jst not consistent and 6th wont make a lot of diff .

Posted
Just now, Straight Drive said:

Haven't seen Vijay Shankar bat in LIST A  Is he any good for longer format. Is he really No 6 batsman for international level. Or is he more of No. 7 test level.

yes he is really good 

Infact few of us has been suggesting here keep him n pandya both in overseas n play acc to pitch .....this will also help pandya workload

Pandya bowling is better and vijays batting 

He can bat at 6, infact ill say 5 .........

Posted

Vijay Shankar ( if he can perform) is just the prototype all rounder Ind needs, a capable batsman who can bowl a bit.You know for certain he is a batsman who can bowl to provide rest for bowlers.

With Pandya,the captain doesn't trust his bowling enough and as a result doesn't bowl him enough and in so far as his batting is concerned,I maintain a player with such feeble numbers in domestic can't be allowed to learn art of batsmanship in test cricket.He is no prodigy either.

Posted
9 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

Openers have been losing their places, Vijay, Dhawan, Rahul all have faced the axe. 

 

Pujara lost his spot. Rahane lost with concerns around their position and batting.

 

Team will try to find players for all those positions.

 

But they need 1 proper batsman for no 6 position too. Someone who can actually take advantage of favorable conditions.

Yes they need to do that. nair should get the opportunity.

Posted

Our problem has been batting. Getting wkts is not the problem. If batting is a problem it gets fixed by a batsman. Not a tough logic to understand.

Posted
1 hour ago, MK55 said:

WTH Bumrah and Shami bowled 30 overs in an innings????

They'll be forced to drop pace if this continues else they won't survive.

It's idiotic to play with just 4 bowlers of which 2 have to ability to bowl 140+.  

 

If your batsmen are devoid of skill, replace them rather than forcing these bowlers to stress their body.

The bowlers won't be effective and we will keep having scenarios where the lower order of the opposition takes the game away.

Well said, this post shud be a part of this topic as well

Posted (edited)

the non performance of batsman  have had a cascading effect on bowlers and i agree with folks here who have stated that we need 5 bowlers.

 

pandya cannot be purely taken in a bowler. we would be better off taking a siraj in here. have a much better chance. pandya inspires no confidence with bat and at least with proper 5 bowlers we can go all out and give the desired rest for our pacers. Kohli has tried to feed more work to his workhorses while carrying more deadwood ( read openers ).

 

dhawan should have been dropped and we should have opened with pujara. Rahul though he scored a bit today leaves a lot to be desired with his footwork and head position.

 

we will lose this test which is good, so that we can clear up some bagage.

 

for austalia considering pitches are going to be bouncy and batsman will last longer bowlers need to be kept fit which means we need 5 proper bowlers.

 

Prithvi

Mayank

Pujara

Kohli

Pant

Rahane/Vihari

Bhuvi>>Vijay shankar>>Pandya

Siraj

Ishant

Bumrah

Umesh/Bhuvi/Khaleel

 

 

this is a very inexperienced team but will ensure that pujara and rahane take up more responsibility . 

 

the main problem we have is we have 5 specialist batsmen who cannot roll their arms. so that can be only 4. So it would be a musical chair between Openers and Rahane. Else we need to move pujara to Open and get one batting and bowling all rounder in 6 and 7 .

 

Batting AR - Vihari( semi), Vijay Shankar

Bowling AR - Ashwin, Jadeja,Bhuvi, Hardik

 

depending on type of pitch we need to decide whether we go for 6 + 5 combo or 5 +2 + 4 or 7 + 4

 

and no ashwin does not walk into test side overseas automatically. he will compete with the others and come in depending on type of pitch.

 

The more you think about this rahane role is redundant. if vihari can bat at 80% rahane level and bowl 5-10 overs per test innings he would be far more valuable.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by prasen82

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...