New guy Posted June 30, 2019 Author Posted June 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, FischerTal said: we lost with atrocious batting by top order. Imagine having the guts to blame players who tried and defend cowards who gave up Switchblade 1
FischerTal Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 1 minute ago, New guy said: Not a single person except you would have. Not trying to win is what people are bkamkg here. And you know this but are too coward to admit you were wrong lol you are the first person to criticize dhoni for anything he does wrong. you would have latched on to it more than anyone else
Sean Bradley Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 (edited) Definitely threw the match on purpose, i would be very happy if Pakistan still qualifies and smacks us if we meet them if that ensures permanent removal of dhoni and jadhav. Edited June 30, 2019 by Sean Bradley construction430, Real McCoy and AuxiliA 3
IndianRenegade Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, Texan said: Jadhav just got to the crease so one can at least say in his case that he was not yet in to get his timing right. But this Dhoni had already spent long time in the middle. Both of them don’t have any excuses in my opinion. The position they are playing they know that they won’t have the same number of balls as the top order, if they can’t accept that, then they shouldn’t be playing in that position and give someone else a chance.
The Dark Horse Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 Just now, FischerTal said: this is a pitch where you need 337. they have to overcompensate for weak middle order. even a run a ball is not good enough Dude what are you smoking...they were the reason we reached 300+ at least. Last 5 overs our run rate was 7..what do you have to say about that?
New guy Posted June 30, 2019 Author Posted June 30, 2019 Just now, FischerTal said: this is a pitch where you need 337. they have to overcompensate for weak middle order. even a run a ball is not good enough So you are literally defending cowards who didn't even try but blamling players who tried but failed? Switchblade 1
rkt.india Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, The Dark Horse said: Bull sh*t. 2 out of three scored a 50 and a 100 at almost run a ball. What is the use of 50 and 100 when RRR is touching 9-10. We were 140 in 30 overs. Needed to score 189 in last 20. 156 in last 15 on a weary pitch. Switchblade 1
FischerTal Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 Just now, New guy said: Imagine having the guts to blame players who tried and defend cowards who gave up emotional outrage gets the best of subcontinental fans instead of practical assessment of the situation. this is not a new phenomenon
FischerTal Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 Just now, The Dark Horse said: Dude what are you smoking...they were the reason we reached 300+ at least. Last 5 overs our run rate was 7..what do you have to say about that? there is no batting after them. not one of our bowlers is a decent batsman.
New guy Posted June 30, 2019 Author Posted June 30, 2019 Just now, FischerTal said: lol you are the first person to criticize dhoni for anything he does wrong. you would have latched on to it more than anyone else Has dhoni been criticized for trying to score and getting out in the last 10 years? Every single time it's his lack of intent and wasting balls Imagine when even commentators are questioning his cowardly approach how much of a boot licker one needs to be to defend this approach
Cricketics Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 Points - Dhoni and And Jadhav did not even try. Should be both questioned for this approach. No effort was seen. - Rohit and Kohli tried to out the rr up but they did play slow and when Pandua came, they left too much for him. First point is the bigger problem. Intent should have been shown by Thala and Jadhav, losing by 6-7 runs or something would have been good as we would have seen some effort.
rkt.india Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 1 minute ago, The Dark Horse said: Dude what are you smoking...they were the reason we reached 300+ at least. Last 5 overs our run rate was 7..what do you have to say about that? Our run rate in first 10 was 2.7. What do you say about that. You can't chase 338 by scoring 27 in pp. 20 more runs and game cou have been different. Switchblade, FischerTal and Jimmy Cliff 3
Popular Post tweaker Posted June 30, 2019 Popular Post Posted June 30, 2019 Laaloo, saik, sergio04 and 7 others 10
New guy Posted June 30, 2019 Author Posted June 30, 2019 Just now, FischerTal said: there is no batting after them. not one of our bowlers is a decent batsman. Which means result would have been same . I don't understand your logic at all? We might have a chance to lose if one of they got out so they deliberately lost? Kahna Kya chahta hai tu?
FischerTal Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 1 minute ago, rkt.india said: Our run rate in first 10 was 2.7. What do you say about that. You can't chase 338 by scoring 27 in pp. 20 more runs and game cou have been different. people don't understand that. just wanna blame the two guys on bottom who have 4 bowlers who can't hit a single boundary coming in after them velu 1
jf1gp_1 Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 One can blame batters as much as you want the Two spinners gave 150 runs in 20 overs thats where we lost. Laaloo, velu and Stan AF 2 1
FischerTal Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, New guy said: Which means result would have been same . I don't understand your logic at all? We might have a chance to lose if one of they got out so they deliberately lost? Kahna Kya chahta hai tu? its the NRR.
The Dark Horse Posted June 30, 2019 Posted June 30, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Our run rate in first 10 was 2.7. What do you say about that. You can't chase 338 by scoring 27 in pp. 20 more runs and game cou have been different. That's all right but we knew the target..they had got out trying to accelerate...on the other hand we didn't even try after Pandya got out. Edited June 30, 2019 by The Dark Horse
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now