Singh bling Posted February 21, 2020 Posted February 21, 2020 https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/geologists-strike-gold-over-3650-tonne-gold-ore-up-sonbhadra/story/396627.html coffee_rules 1
sandeep Posted February 21, 2020 Posted February 21, 2020 Marketing Press release. Actual amounts that can be mined cost-effectively will likely be a fraction. And mining is a very destructive polluting business. Sympathies for any towns and villages in the area. Gollum 1
coffee_rules Posted February 22, 2020 Posted February 22, 2020 3350 tones to 160 kgs, what a huge KLPD velu 1
Muloghonto Posted February 23, 2020 Posted February 23, 2020 All initial mining estimates are usually in terms of tonnage of raw ore, with specified estimated actual metal/mineral recovery value. If you see only one number, rule of thumb is it’s the gross ore estimate velu 1
Mariyam Posted February 23, 2020 Posted February 23, 2020 (edited) 14 hours ago, coffee_rules said: 3350 tones to 160 kgs, what a huge KLPD 160 kgs? That's it? That is like digging out another Bappi Lahiri. Edited February 23, 2020 by Mariyam coffee_rules, cowboysfan, Jimmy Cliff and 3 others 1 5
kosingh Posted February 24, 2020 Posted February 24, 2020 Gold mine version of Indian runner faster than Usain Bolt. Stan AF 1
Vilander Posted February 24, 2020 Posted February 24, 2020 On 2/22/2020 at 7:12 PM, Muloghonto said: All initial mining estimates are usually in terms of tonnage of raw ore, with specified estimated actual metal/mineral recovery value. If you see only one number, rule of thumb is it’s the gross ore estimate here you can see his lordship muloghanta reading news articles explaining this very fact in detail ( that some presstitute unknowingly sensationalized ore estimates to be actual gold reserve estimate values) and posing as if he knew it all along and posting matter of fact.
Recommended Posts