Hardik Pandya mega discussion thread

[R!TTER]

28 minutes ago, raki05 said:

...he is just going to be a poor man by end of his career.

That's unlikely, till his wife divorces him & leaves him with a ton of alimony to cover 

[raki05]

Just now, R!TTER said:

That's unlikely, till his wife divorces him & leaves him with a ton of alimony to cover 

Soon ll happen, Once this guy ll be regularly seen in baroda XI.

[cricketfan28]

He is  poor at quality cricket.

[Rantzz]

Pandu is a vastly inferior player to Neesham

 

probably Pandu is poor man’s robin singh

[Trichromatic]

7 hours ago, zen said:

Done it many times … if Neesham played for Ind, there would have been such a thread on him as well as the Tuk Tuk Brie age would hardly give these players an opportunity to perform  … it is tough for free flowing players to succeed in an Indian setup 

 

The irony is that Tuk Tuk brigade do not even play even half a good inning like Mitchell  

 

I challenge you to cite 3-5 examples when he has done it in T20I, basically scenario where others are scoring at 6-7 RPO and Pandya comes in to change the momentum significantly by scoring at 10-12 RPO.

 

He goes in tuk tuk mode if other haven't been able to score quickly. He scores quickly when others are piling runs at 8-9 rpo. Basically able to perform only when it's easy to score for everyone else.

 

NZ inning was perfect example where Jadeja who is nowhere close to Pandya in hitting reputation was scored at 130+ SR and Pandya was scoring at 95.

 

Scenario 1:

Last 5 overs, 5 wickets left in hand. India scored at 5.2 RPO. Good opportunity for Pandya to show his hitting ability.

 

What does he do? 10 runs in 9 balls and gets out in 19th over. Runs at 6 RPO, basically no upgrade at all.

 

Scenario 2:

Last 4 overs, NZ scoring at 6.6 RPO, 6 wickets left need runs at 13 RPO. What does Neesham do? Does he hide behind failures of top order? Does he hide behind the fact that others were struggling to score? He goes berserk and NZ scored 23 runs in next over.

 

7 hours ago, zen said:

Done it many times … if Neesham played for Ind, there would have been such a thread on him as well as the Tuk Tuk Brie age would hardly give these players an opportunity to perform  … it is tough for free flowing players to succeed in an Indian setup 

 

The irony is that Tuk Tuk brigade do not even play even half a good inning like Mitchell  

 

So, you admit that Pandya is not able to score if top order struggles? He can perform only on flat pitches where others have already scored at 8-9 RPO, basically set the stage for Pandya to score easy runs, which btw, any lower order batsman would do for India and Pandya brings nothing special by his batting?

[Trichromatic]

7 hours ago, TNAmarkFromIndia said:

Ridiculous that people here are laying the blame for Pandya's shortcomings on the top order. 

 

And where has he been blamed for shortcomings for top order?

[Number]

He is dropped now. It looks to be end of him in T20s.

[Frustrated]

1 hour ago, Number said:

He is dropped now. It looks to be end of him in T20s.

I read on some other thread that there is no official source which states that he has been dropped.   So, in all likelihood ,he will be back after few months, with new types of hidden injuries.  LOL

[Trichromatic]

Pandya's innings v non-minnows in T20I.

 

Inn 1 - India 53/6 in 9.4 v SL. Pandya walked in, got out in 10.6 overs, scored 6(2), SR of 33. Basically Pandya failed when top order failed. Ashwin scored 31 in 24 balls in same match when he came to bat after Pandya.

Flop inning - 1.

 

Inn 2 - India 127/3 in 14.2 overs v SL. RR of 8.9 with both openers score big. Pandya walked in and scored 27 (12).

Flop inning - 1, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 3 - India chasing low score of 84 v Pakistan, Pandy walks in 76/4 in 14.2 overs. Scored 0(2)

Flop innings - 2, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 4 - India chasing 139 v SL. Pandya walks in at 121/4 in 16.5 overs. Scored 2(4)

Flop innings - 3, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 5 - India chasing 126 v NZ. Pandya walked in at 39/5 in 8.2 overs. Scored 1(7). India lost.

Flop innings - 4, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 6 - India 98/5 in 13.2 overs v Eng. Pandya scored 9 (12). SR of 75 when quick runs were needed. Got out at 118. Another scenario when team was scoring at over 7.5 RPO and Pandya needed to step up by scoring quicker. Instead of that he decided to play tuk tuk knock.

Flop innings - 5, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 7 - India 125/4 in 17.2 overs. Another scenario when team was scoring at 7.2 RPO. Needed quick runs. Pandya scored 2(3)

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1. KL Rahul did Deryl Mitchell and scored 71 in same match.

 

Inn 8 - India 177/4 in 18.1 overs. Pandya 11 (4).

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2.

 

Inn 9 - India 60/6 in 11.1 overs. Pandya scored 25(23) v Eng. India scored 118 and India lost.

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1

 

Inn 10 - 158/1 in 16.4 overs. Pandya 0(2) v NZ, Openers scored 80 each in the match and India scored 202.

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 11 - India 65/3 in 8.4 overs v NZ. Pandya 1(2). Kohli scored 65 in same match. India lost.

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 12 - 8 overs innings. Pandya scored 14(10). Pandey scored at SR of 154 and Kohli at 216. India scored 19 runs in last 14 balls and Pandya faced 10 of those deliveries.

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 13 - 243/2 in 18.4 overs v SL. Pandya 10(3). Openers scored 119 and 83 in the match

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 14 - India chasing 81/3 in 13.2 overs chasing 136 v SL. Pandya 4(4) when batted ahead of Karthik and Dhoni. Got chance to bat 6+ overs.

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 15 - India 183/5 in 18.1 overs v SL. Pandya 13(7). SR of top order - 233, 184, 214. Pandya's SR 185. What's special there?

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2

 

Inn 15 - India 183/5 in 18.1 overs v SL. Pandya 13(7). SR of top order - 233, 184, 214. Pandya's SR 185. What's special there?

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2

 

Inn 16 - 111/3 in 13.1 overs v SA. Perfect stage for Pandya. Great start, wickets in hand. SR of top 4 - 137, 117, 159, 130.

Pandya 21(17) at SR of 123. 

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 1

 

Inn 17 - 111/5 in 17.1 overs v Eng. Perfect stage for Pandya. Wickets in hands, need a hitter who can give quick runs. Pandya 12(10) without getting dismissed. SR of 120 when batsman above him scored at 123, 135, 133.

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 18 - India 151/3 in 14.5 overs v Eng. Pandya 33(14) when Rohit scored 100. Aother scenario when Pandya actually managed to score when India was already going great over 10 RPO. 

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 19 - India 72/5 in 10.2 overs chasing 220. Pandya 4(4) v NZ.

Flop innings - 9, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 20 - India chasing 212 v NZ. Lost by 4 runs. India 121/3 in 12.2 overs. Perfect stage for Pandya to win the game for India. Scored 21(11) and got out at 145 in 14.5 overs. Krunal and Karthik took India close to NZ score with SR of 200+.

Flop innings - 9, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 21 - Ind 90/4 in 12.4 v SA. Another scenario when India was scoring at 7 RPO, stage was set for Pandya to score quickly as specialist hitter. Scored 4(7) at SR of 75.

Flop innings - 10, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 22 - Ind 90/4 in 12.4 v Aus. Another scenario when India was scoring at 7 RPO, stage was set for Pandya to score quickly as specialist hitter. Jadeja 44(23), India scored 161. Pandya - 16(15) SR of 111.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 23 - Ind 120/3 in 13.4 v Aus. Pandya 44(22). Probably only match where Pandya was able to score quicker than others when needed.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1

 

Inn 24 - India 100/4 in 13 overs. Pandya 20(13) v Aus. India needed 87 in 7 overs. Scenario similar to NZ v Eng where Kohli did Mitchell by scoring 85. Did Pandya do a Neesham? Instead Shardul scored at SR of 242 doing what Pandya was supposed to do. Kohli scored at much faster rate during that partnership.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1

 

Inn 25 - India 48/4 in 10 overs. Pandya 19(21). v Eng. India score 54 in next 74 overs and Shreays Iyer did hitting. Good knock of consolidator.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, 

 

Inn 26 - India 48/4 in 10 overs. Pandya 19(21). v Eng. India score 54 in next 74 overs and Shreays Iyer did hitting. Good knock of consolidator.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, 

 

Inn 27 - India 86/5 in 14.3 overs. India barely going at 6 RPO. With Kohli at crease, India needed a hitter to score quick runs. India scored 70 runs in next 33 balls. Pandya 17(15) v Eng at SR of 113.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Inn 28 - India 144/5 in 16.2 overs, Pandya - 11(8) v Eng

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 29 - India 143/2 in 13.2 overs. Pandya - 39(17) v NZ.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 30 - India 127/4 in 15.2 overs. Going at 8 RPO, stage set for Pandya for quick runs. Scored 10(12).

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 31 - India 84/4 in 12.4 overs. Pandya scored 11(8) v Pak

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Inn 32 - India 48/4 in 10.1 overs. Pandya 23 (24) v NZ. 

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 3, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

[Trichromatic]

Innings where Pandya played role of consolidator or flopped completely or played slow when needed

Flop innings - 12,

Tuk tuk when other failed - 3, 

Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2,

Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2

Tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3,

Slower than what was needed in chase - 1,

Tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Innings where Pandya played role of lower order big hitter

Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5

Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

Quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1

 

Clearly Pandya is capable on big hitting only when top order has set the stage by scoring at 9-10 RPO by 12-15 overs. Rest of the time he is a tuk tuk batsman when he is required to score quicker than others. He is best suited for consolidator role.

[Trichromatic]

Flop innings of top order is just an excuse behind which Pandya fans hide. Truth is Pandya can't score if like of Rahul, Dhawan, Rohit don't score big and quick. If others are not able to score quickly, then Pandya plays tuk tuk knocks of SR sub 100 himself. 

 

Even Jadeja has more useful knocks than Pandya's innings in T20Is.

 

[zen]

A lot of logical fallacies and reliance on perceptions: 

 

2 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

I challenge you to cite 3-5 examples when he has done it in T20I, basically scenario where others are scoring at 6-7 RPO and Pandya comes in to change the momentum significantly by scoring at 10-12 RPO.

 

He did it against Pak in this WC where he scored 17 runs of Afridi's over (Ind's entire innings run rate was around 7.5) ... So what are the next conditions, leg byes don't count, he needs to stand on one leg and hit a 6

 

 

2 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

He goes in tuk tuk mode if other haven't been able to score quickly. He scores quickly when others are piling runs at 8-9 rpo. Basically able to perform only when it's easy to score for everyone else.

 

 

Ah ha, so now the genius condition is that if a pitch is bad for batting and others struggle, he has to play as if the pitch is a batting paradise and if it is a batting paradise and he is scores at even high strike rate, it does not count  

 

 

Quote

NZ inning was perfect example where Jadeja who is nowhere close to Pandya in hitting reputation was scored at 130+ SR and Pandya was scoring at 95.

 

Again, SDP steadied the ship and got out going for a 6 in a lost cause. I am sure that you do not know that NZ terrific fielding saved many runs including a potential 6 

 

And what did Jadeja do against Pakistan? Oh wait, SDP has to do what x did against team a, what y did against team b, and c did against team c

 

Quote

 

Scenario 1:

Last 5 overs, 5 wickets left in hand. India scored at 5.2 RPO. Good opportunity for Pandya to show his hitting ability.

 

What does he do? 10 runs in 9 balls and gets out in 19th over. Runs at 6 RPO, basically no upgrade at all.

 

 

And such things have never happened in cricket ... oh wait, you are a fan of certain someone who actually slowed down to score his 100th 100 against BD, a game that Ind lost  

 

 

2 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

Scenario 2:

Last 4 overs, NZ scoring at 6.6 RPO, 6 wickets left need runs at 13 RPO. What does Neesham do? Does he hide behind failures of top order? Does he hide behind the fact that others were struggling to score? He goes berserk and NZ scored 23 runs in next over.

 

And has Nesham taken 3 wkts in 3 balls like SDP did v BD? 

 

DId Neesham take 17 runs of Afridi's over when NZ batted first? No, he scored only 1 run. 

 

But let's compare an inning batting 2nd v those scored batting 1st  

 

So if A does badly v X & Y but does well v Z, B does badly v  X & Z but does well v Y, and C does badly v Y & Z, but well v X, SDP has to play like A v Z, like B v Y, and C v X  

 

2 hours ago, Trichromatic said:

So, you admit that Pandya is not able to score if top order struggles? He can perform only on flat pitches where others have already scored at 8-9 RPO, basically set the stage for Pandya to score easy runs, which btw, any lower order batsman would do for India and Pandya brings nothing special by his batting?

 

Well, top order fails when the conditions are tough and/or bowling is tough. Did they get out v SCO and NAM, no? Did they get out against NZ and PAK, yes? 

 

Talking about conditions - has Tendulkar ever performed in a WC final? A performed in 1975 final, B performed in 1979 final, C performed in 1983 final, D performed in 1987 final, E performed in 1992 final, F performed in 1996 final, G performed in 1999 final, H performed in 2003 final (Ponting smashed India), I performed in 2007 final (Tendulkar performed v Bermuda), J performed in 2011 final (Gambhir stood up)

 

 Has he?

 

 

 

[coffee_rules]

@zen selectors have given up. You haven’t! Tumhari to daad deni padegi! Vc, Shardul, and Pandya were dropped!

[zen]

40 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

Pandya's innings v non-minnows in T20I.

 

Inn 1 - India 53/6 in 9.4 v SL. Pandya walked in, got out in 10.6 overs, scored 6(2), SR of 33. Basically Pandya failed when top order failed. Ashwin scored 31 in 24 balls in same match when he came to bat after Pandya.

Flop inning - 1.

 

Inn 2 - India 127/3 in 14.2 overs v SL. RR of 8.9 with both openers score big. Pandya walked in and scored 27 (12).

Flop inning - 1, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 3 - India chasing low score of 84 v Pakistan, Pandy walks in 76/4 in 14.2 overs. Scored 0(2)

Flop innings - 2, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 4 - India chasing 139 v SL. Pandya walks in at 121/4 in 16.5 overs. Scored 2(4)

Flop innings - 3, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 5 - India chasing 126 v NZ. Pandya walked in at 39/5 in 8.2 overs. Scored 1(7). India lost.

Flop innings - 4, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 6 - India 98/5 in 13.2 overs v Eng. Pandya scored 9 (12). SR of 75 when quick runs were needed. Got out at 118. Another scenario when team was scoring at over 7.5 RPO and Pandya needed to step up by scoring quicker. Instead of that he decided to play tuk tuk knock.

Flop innings - 5, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 7 - India 125/4 in 17.2 overs. Another scenario when team was scoring at 7.2 RPO. Needed quick runs. Pandya scored 2(3)

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 1. KL Rahul did Deryl Mitchell and scored 71 in same match.

 

Inn 8 - India 177/4 in 18.1 overs. Pandya 11 (4).

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2.

 

Inn 9 - India 60/6 in 11.1 overs. Pandya scored 25(23) v Eng. India scored 118 and India lost.

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1

 

Inn 10 - 158/1 in 16.4 overs. Pandya 0(2) v NZ, Openers scored 80 each in the match and India scored 202.

Flop innings - 6, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 11 - India 65/3 in 8.4 overs v NZ. Pandya 1(2). Kohli scored 65 in same match. India lost.

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1

 

Inn 12 - 8 overs innings. Pandya scored 14(10). Pandey scored at SR of 154 and Kohli at 216. India scored 19 runs in last 14 balls and Pandya faced 10 of those deliveries.

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 2, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 13 - 243/2 in 18.4 overs v SL. Pandya 10(3). Openers scored 119 and 83 in the match

Flop innings - 7, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 14 - India chasing 81/3 in 13.2 overs chasing 136 v SL. Pandya 4(4) when batted ahead of Karthik and Dhoni. Got chance to bat 6+ overs.

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 1

 

Inn 15 - India 183/5 in 18.1 overs v SL. Pandya 13(7). SR of top order - 233, 184, 214. Pandya's SR 185. What's special there?

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2

 

Inn 15 - India 183/5 in 18.1 overs v SL. Pandya 13(7). SR of top order - 233, 184, 214. Pandya's SR 185. What's special there?

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2

 

Inn 16 - 111/3 in 13.1 overs v SA. Perfect stage for Pandya. Great start, wickets in hand. SR of top 4 - 137, 117, 159, 130.

Pandya 21(17) at SR of 123. 

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 1

 

Inn 17 - 111/5 in 17.1 overs v Eng. Perfect stage for Pandya. Wickets in hands, need a hitter who can give quick runs. Pandya 12(10) without getting dismissed. SR of 120 when batsman above him scored at 123, 135, 133.

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 3, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 18 - India 151/3 in 14.5 overs v Eng. Pandya 33(14) when Rohit scored 100. Aother scenario when Pandya actually managed to score when India was already going great over 10 RPO. 

Flop innings - 8, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 19 - India 72/5 in 10.2 overs chasing 220. Pandya 4(4) v NZ.

Flop innings - 9, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2

 

Inn 20 - India chasing 212 v NZ. Lost by 4 runs. India 121/3 in 12.2 overs. Perfect stage for Pandya to win the game for India. Scored 21(11) and got out at 145 in 14.5 overs. Krunal and Karthik took India close to NZ score with SR of 200+.

Flop innings - 9, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 21 - Ind 90/4 in 12.4 v SA. Another scenario when India was scoring at 7 RPO, stage was set for Pandya to score quickly as specialist hitter. Scored 4(7) at SR of 75.

Flop innings - 10, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 22 - Ind 90/4 in 12.4 v Aus. Another scenario when India was scoring at 7 RPO, stage was set for Pandya to score quickly as specialist hitter. Jadeja 44(23), India scored 161. Pandya - 16(15) SR of 111.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1

 

Inn 23 - Ind 120/3 in 13.4 v Aus. Pandya 44(22). Probably only match where Pandya was able to score quicker than others when needed.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1

 

Inn 24 - India 100/4 in 13 overs. Pandya 20(13) v Aus. India needed 87 in 7 overs. Scenario similar to NZ v Eng where Kohli did Mitchell by scoring 85. Did Pandya do a Neesham? Instead Shardul scored at SR of 242 doing what Pandya was supposed to do. Kohli scored at much faster rate during that partnership.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 1, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1

 

Inn 25 - India 48/4 in 10 overs. Pandya 19(21). v Eng. India score 54 in next 74 overs and Shreays Iyer did hitting. Good knock of consolidator.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, 

 

Inn 26 - India 48/4 in 10 overs. Pandya 19(21). v Eng. India score 54 in next 74 overs and Shreays Iyer did hitting. Good knock of consolidator.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, 

 

Inn 27 - India 86/5 in 14.3 overs. India barely going at 6 RPO. With Kohli at crease, India needed a hitter to score quick runs. India scored 70 runs in next 33 balls. Pandya 17(15) v Eng at SR of 113.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 1, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Inn 28 - India 144/5 in 16.2 overs, Pandya - 11(8) v Eng

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 4, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 29 - India 143/2 in 13.2 overs. Pandya - 39(17) v NZ.

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 2, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 30 - India 127/4 in 15.2 overs. Going at 8 RPO, stage set for Pandya for quick runs. Scored 10(12).

Flop innings - 11, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 31 - India 84/4 in 12.4 overs. Pandya scored 11(8) v Pak

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Inn 32 - India 48/4 in 10.1 overs. Pandya 23 (24) v NZ. 

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 3, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

 

Flop analysis ...

 

[zen]

1 minute ago, coffee_rules said:

@zen selectors have given up. You haven’t! Tumhari to daad deni padegi! Vc, Shardul, and Pandya were dropped!

 

SDP was played in all the games in the WC by the TM ... What selectors, who come and go, do is a non-issue and also I go by reports on cricinfo 

[coffee_rules]

Just now, zen said:

 

SDP was played in all the games in the WC by the TM ... What selectors, who come and go, do is a non-issue and also I go by reports on cricinfo 

Dropped for the next series vs NZ in India. Maybe he is not fully fit. Let him take rest and come back strong. 

[zen]

Just now, coffee_rules said:

Dropped for the next series vs NZ in India. Maybe he is not fully fit. Let him take rest and come back strong. 

 

Dropped/rested/rotated/whatever ... Who cares about such series? I may not even watch it  

[Adamant]

1 hour ago, Trichromatic said:

Pandya's innings v non-minnows in T20I.

 

, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1.

 

Inn 31 - India 84/4 in 12.4 overs. Pandya scored 11(8) v Pak

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 2, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Inn 32 - India 48/4 in 10.1 overs. Pandya 23 (24) v NZ. 

Flop innings - 12, Quick runs under cushion of runs from top order - 5, tuk tuk when other failed - 3, Flop under cushion of runs from top order - 2, Slower than other when quick runs needed - 2, tuk tuk when quick runs needed under no pressure - 3, Quick runs when needed, although in lost cause - 1, quick runs when needed in winning cause - 1, slower than what was needed in chase - 1, tuk tuk when other batsman was going berserk - 1

 

Done and dusted.. 

Pandya fully exposed. 

[Adamant]

26 minutes ago, zen said:

 

Flop analysis ...

 

So he listed out all of Pandya's innings in t20i cricket and went through each one and exposed your 2 kaudi ka allrounder , you got no retort and so you start your youtube comment routine here. 

 

If you don't understand cricket and don't have a IQ above 70 then please stick to YouTube. 

[Adamant]

21 minutes ago, zen said:

 

Dropped/rested/rotated/whatever ... Who cares about such series? I may not even watch it  

 

 

36 minutes ago, zen said:

A lot of logical fallacies and reliance on perceptions: 

 

 

He did it against Pak in this WC where he scored 17 runs of Afridi's over (Ind's entire innings run rate was around 7.5) ... So what are the next conditions, leg byes don't count, he needs to stand on one leg and hit a 6

Leg byes don't count towards a batsman's score that has always been the case, as I said stick to YouTube.