vvvslaxman Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, Majestic said: Looks like Indian cap has become pretty cheap since the IPL has settled in. Feels like we were unfortunate to quit cricket in teenage just because our seniors and family members said, there is no chance for us reaching to that level. Nevertheless, will tell my future kid if he has the same obsession for cricket to keep trying, "IPL tak to pahuch jaoge hi"..... the problem what you select is at the same level what you didn't select. They have to pull away from the pack very fast like Kohli did. So far Gill has done a good job this year. So has Samson. India has the ability to field two separate batting line up. Bowling is where probably we will lose as we can't field two separate bowling units.
nevada Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 I don't see any issue in playing Hooda or giving chance to a wider pool of players but benching Samson after just own game is too much. zen 1
deepdynamo Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 Guess right now India has a pool of 30 players in white ball cricket which is too much. Ideally it should be 20 players and further pruned to 15 for tournaments.
Majestic Posted November 27, 2022 Author Posted November 27, 2022 12 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Sundar isn't a backup for Pandya. You will not get enough spots to pick seperate players as backup for Pandya and Jadeja both. It will be a 15 man squad and 3 reserves. Only one all rounder can be a backup in 15 man squad. In Asia, we can play Sundar at 6 or 7 both so he makes up for either Pandya or Jadeja( in case of any injury). Vijy 1
Vijy Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 18 minutes ago, Majestic said: You will not get enough spots to pick seperate players as backup for Pandya and Jadeja both. It will be a 15 man squad and 3 reserves. Only one all rounder can be a backup in 15 man squad. In Asia, we can play Sundar at 6 or 7 both so he makes up for either Pandya or Jadeja( in case of any injury). he can also play at 5. has the game to do it
Majestic Posted November 27, 2022 Author Posted November 27, 2022 15 minutes ago, Vijy said: he can also play at 5. has the game to do it Yes which should allow us to play SKY at 6 instead of KLR/Iyer. But anyways won't go that far, these are not official decisions you make but change based on the game situation. One thing that they can definitely do now is ensure they back Sundar over Hooda and Axar. I don't want to see Axar getting all games in Bangladesh series while Sundar is backup there. Vijy 1
raki05 Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 I will go with bottom up approach for wc. This is how the team should be( no option but to accomodate senior useless batters as they are not gng anywhere) Siraj Bumrah Shami Jadeja Sundar Pandya Pant Iyer Kohli Rohit( Would love to see Gill) Dhawan ( would love to have any other left hander like Jaiswal)
deepdynamo Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 We should finalize 18-20 odd players by the start of the next series ( after BD) and give them ample game time in their positions. Right now, here are the players (26) that are in contention Batsman (7) Rohit, Dhawan, Gill, Kohli, Rohit, Iyer, Sky WK(3) Pant, Smason, Ishan Allrounders (7) Pandya, Jadeja, Washington, Hooda, Axar, Chahar, Shardul Spinners(3) Yuzi, Kuldeep, Ashwin Pacers(6) Bumrah, Shami, Siraj, Prasidh, Arshdeep, Umran Stan AF 1
Majestic Posted November 27, 2022 Author Posted November 27, 2022 (edited) 14 minutes ago, deepdynamo said: We should finalize 18-20 odd players by the start of the next series ( after BD) and give them ample game time in their positions. Right now, here are the players (26) that are in contention Batsman (7) Rohit, Dhawan, Gill, Kohli, Rohit, Iyer, Sky WK(3) Pant, Smason, Ishan Allrounders (7) Pandya, Jadeja, Washington, Hooda, Axar, Chahar, Shardul Spinners(3) Yuzi, Kuldeep, Ashwin Pacers(6) Bumrah, Shami, Siraj, Prasidh, Arshdeep, Umran Add Rahul in keeper tally. Prithvi Shaw won't get a look? Edited November 27, 2022 by Majestic
express bowling Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 (edited) 4 hours ago, rkt.india said: Sundar isn't a backup for Pandya. ODIs on normal or fast tracks .... 6. Sundar 7. Jadeja 8. Chahar 9. Siraj 10. Bumrah 11. Umran / Sen Replace a pacer with Kuldeep on gripping tracks. This gives us the option of 3 proper fast bowlers and a swing bowler cum allrounder. Plus 2 spinners which can become 3 on gripping tracks. We can even have this batting if Hardik is present 1. Rohit ( only because he is the captain ) 2. Gill 3. Kohli 4. SKY 5. Hardik Edited November 27, 2022 by express bowling
Majestic Posted November 27, 2022 Author Posted November 27, 2022 Can Axar Patel or even Ravindra Jadeja ever play a scoop shot like this? Tells us about the kind of talent this guy is. He is a better all rounder talent than even Pandya.
Majestic Posted November 27, 2022 Author Posted November 27, 2022 19 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: Batting wise he is right up there,he is the best batting talent Tamil Nadu has produced. He lacks brute power but technique, temperament, elegance everything is there and now a bit of improvisation as well.
putrevus Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 9 hours ago, Majestic said: Today, they have selected Deepak Hooda instead of Samson. I don't see any point of selecting him in Indian ODI team. We are unnecessarily increasing the pool of players here. This is not a right preparation for ODI World Cup. Hardik Pandya is a given at no.6 in ODIs and if he is fit and bowling then there is no question on his place. In case he gets injured you have Washington Sundar who has got good temperament, improved his range of shots and seems to have perfected in timing the ball well too. He is your backup for Pandya. There is no need for Hooda just for the sake of getting the balance right in today's game. Moreover, you will also have Jadeja at 7 and Axar Patel is also there as backup and he is in Bangladesh squad. So, what is the need of trying Deepak Hooda here in New Zealand? Why not go with six batsman, analyse them after this series (3 games) and then make decision on which all players you will move forward? Now, what they have done is rejected Samson unfairly after first game, he isn't in Bangladesh squad also and then the home series vs other teams will start where the main players will be there. So, I don't see Samson getting chances anytime in recent future in ODI format. Only if Rahul/Pant get injured or decide to rest again in ODI bilaterals for the orange Cup race in IPL and the home series vs Australia, Samson has a chance but come the World Cup they will go back to Rahul/Pant again. What we need is to strengthen the pool of 15 players that will go into the World Cup and make them world class rather than trying to give everyone games and instead increase the count to 30 good players. Samson is being treated unfairly here.He should have played all t20s also. Swag 1
wanted_desi Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 It is increasing because we are not phasing out oldies.
putrevus Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 How old were Sachin and Sehwag in 2011.How many world cups did Sachin play and what ICC trophy did he win again before 2011 .
Vijy Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 9 hours ago, Majestic said: Yes which should allow us to play SKY at 6 instead of KLR/Iyer. But anyways won't go that far, these are not official decisions you make but change based on the game situation. One thing that they can definitely do now is ensure they back Sundar over Hooda and Axar. I don't want to see Axar getting all games in Bangladesh series while Sundar is backup there. yes, that's true
Vijy Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 (edited) 27 minutes ago, putrevus said: How old were Sachin and Sehwag in 2011.How many world cups did Sachin play and what ICC trophy did he win again before 2011 . he won the 2002 CT (joint winners with SL), but you were probably not around then.... at least get your facts right Edited November 27, 2022 by Vijy rollingstoned and Clarke 1 1
putrevus Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 1 minute ago, Vijy said: he won the 2002 CT (joint winners vs SL), but you were probably not around then. Did I tell you I was not around, stop making assumptions.. Joint winners due to rain not due tie incase your memory is fading.
Vijy Posted November 27, 2022 Posted November 27, 2022 2 minutes ago, putrevus said: Did I tell you I was not around, stop making assumptions.. Joint winners due to rain not due tie incase your memory is fading. still counts as winners. if you were around, you should have remembered it. or perhaps you deliberately chose to ignore it. whatever floats your boat
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now