Jump to content

Pak team looks better than Indian team


gakgupta

Recommended Posts

Lol... So Bumrah and Siraj aren't world class for you? 

 

 

Their fast bowlers had the best day out against us and we still managed to get to 267 which we probably would have defended on that wicket. We are yet to see how their average batting line-up will fare against a decent bowling attack under pressure. This balance thing is just pure non sense...their Shadabs and Faheems add as much balance  as our sharduls and Jadejas.

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Norman said:

Lol... So Bumrah and Siraj aren't world class for you? 

 

 

Their fast bowlers had the best day out against us and we still managed to get to 267 which we probably would have defended on that wicket. We are yet to see how their average batting line-up will fare against a decent bowling attack under pressure. This balance thing is just pure non sense...their Shadabs and Faheems add as much balance  as our sharduls and Jadejas.

Their pace attack is indeed better than us...  No two ways about it.  At least in limited overs cricket. 

In Test Cricket India is leagues ahead. 

Overall their LOI side is very strong in Asian conditions. 

Indian side is in need of fresh faces in batting unit...

Link to comment
1 hour ago, gakgupta said:

Current Pak team looks way better and balanced than Indian team and frontrunners to win this World Cup..

 

It's a Shame that Indian team couldn't identify one pace bowler while Pak has 3 world class pace bowlers...

 

They keep sticking to sharduls chahars and not giving chances to genuine pace bowlers....

Siraj & Bumrah are world class.

Kuldeep is miles better than any spinner they have.

It's our joke of batting which makes them look better that what they're in reality.

 

The moment they will face England or Australia...all their world class quicks will be punctured to the ground by likes of Head, Marsh, Butler & Bairstow.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Norman said:

Lol... So Bumrah and Siraj aren't world class for you? 

 

 

Their fast bowlers had the best day out against us and we still managed to get to 267 which we probably would have defended on that wicket. We are yet to see how their average batting line-up will fare against a decent bowling attack under pressure. This balance thing is just pure non sense...their Shadabs and Faheems add as much balance  as our sharduls and Jadejas.

 

Bumrah is coming back from injury..he is not even half effective as earlier.... Just the names doesn't make a good team..

 

Siraj is good but cannot call him world class

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Their pace attack is indeed better than us...  No two ways about it.  At least in limited overs cricket. 

In Test Cricket India is leagues ahead. 

Overall their LOI side is very strong in Asian conditions. 

Indian side is in need of fresh faces in batting unit...

 

It may or may not be better. That's a whole another discussion. But to say we do not have a single world class pace bowler is just plain stupid to say the least. Bumrah and Siraj are just good as anyone in Asia. Shami even today can produce some unplayable spells.

 

It's okay to be subjective but no point in completely going over the board.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, gakgupta said:

Bumrah is coming back from injury..he is not even half effective as earlier.... Just the names doesn't make a good team..

 

Siraj is good but cannot call him world class

 

And how did you conclude that he is "not even half effective as earlier". He pretty much looked close to his best in Ireland in terms of speed and rhythm.

 

If Siraj with bowling average of 20 isn't world class, them so aren't Naseem or Rauf lol. 

Edited by Norman
Link to comment
2 hours ago, gakgupta said:

 

Bumrah is coming back from injury..he is not even half effective as earlier.... Just the names doesn't make a good team..

 

Siraj is good but cannot call him world class

Siraj is world class indeed, so is bumrah and Yadav, your right by now we should have had sen, prasidh or tyagi as regulars in the odi format, we will find out tomorrow, India should win.

Link to comment
19 minutes ago, MediumPacer said:

India has generally not been known for pacers,pak on the other hand has always had them.But now our batsmen can get stuck against spin.

India actually overcame this philosophy between 2016-2021 atleast in Tests..our bowlers ruled the longer format courtesy of their skillset. 

But poor selections in white ball never helped us transition the same into ODI & T20's, we also didn't prepare any bench strength and kept on playing the same bowlers despite of the fact that they're now ageing and slowing down (ex Shami & Umesh).

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Norman said:

 

It may or may not be better. That's a whole another discussion. But to say we do not have a single world class pace bowler is just plain stupid to say the least. Bumrah and Siraj are just good as anyone in Asia. Shami even today can produce some unplayable spells.

 

It's okay to be subjective but no point in completely going over the board.

Siraj is our best ODI pacer rn & maybe second only to Shaheen in the World rn.  Hazelwood is other consistent gun ODI bowler in last 2 years... And is rightfully ranked no 1

I have always been critical of Bumrah in this format..  ODIs is indeed his weakest format. Hopefully he turns it around this Asia Cup & WC. 

 

Shami is a hit or miss...  We don't know which Shami will turn up on the day. And he is old gun now. 

It is a good attack but a tier below Aus Pak consistently. 

We need another Siraj esque wicket taker to wreck havoc in PP. 

Sad to see Tyagi & Kuldeep Sen were not developed. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Bigg Brother said:

Because Indian team is so imbalanced and random that Pakistan looks better. They are no world beaters but shitty team selection of India makes it look that they are better..

I am not worried about pakistani attack but i am deeply frightened with the thought if kela would take the field in place of either of Kishan/Iyer :fear1:

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...