Jump to content

Virat Kohli to settle down in London with his family ?


Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, jigjig said:

Yeah so, what are the chances he takes Brit citizenship and plays for England in 2027 WC :hysterical:

None. He would have to be living in the UK continuously for 5 years as a permanent resident before he is eligible for citizenship and that pr is also not earlier than 3 years after arrival. So best case he would be close to 45 years old before he could even be considered.

Posted
15 hours ago, Adamant said:

The beta male has failed to do his job.

 

Just like Gambhir, Kohli has two high scores in our last two icc trophies, Wt20 2024 and Ct 2013, also played a fine knock in wc 2011.

 

He also scored 760 runs in One world cup something which Your Gambhir couldn’t do in two of them.

 

Not to mention series win in Aus, draw in England and being highest run scorer of our draw series in SA.

 

Gambhir is A proper beta male who said so many things about superstar culture when he was out of the team but is now sucking their balls. 

 

Will take Gambhir over the so called "Alpha" male Kohli who hasn't done anything. We all saw the "top" score Kohli managed in WT20 2024 and how Bumrah's mastercalss needed to save India. I would take Gambhir's 97 in the WC Final over the 700 runs Kohli accumulated in the ODI WC but when he really needed to put up a score he failed. It was no different than his Perth 100 coming in at 300/2 and scoring that impactless 100. Scoring cheap runs coming in the wake of Rohit taking apart the bowling or when Shami, Bumrah and bowlers had already kept opponent to a lowish total isn't something to be proud of. He had a chance to make the difference in the final and he showed his true colors as usual. It's similar to Kohli's Test runs - couldn't win even a single Away Test but never missed an opportunity to score cheap runs. When someone like Shardul Thakur has more of an impact in Away Test than "King" Kohli, that says it all.

Posted
9 hours ago, Sgattick10 said:

It's never ending chatter on sm

 

He can go wherever the * he wants...just he and his wife need to stop giving gyan on "how to celebrate Hindu festivals".

 

He is a cricketer, not an expert on religious festivals...he can do his advertising by selling MRF ZLX tyres or Livspace wooden furniture.

Posted
14 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Will take Gambhir over the so called "Alpha" male Kohli who hasn't done anything. We all saw the "top" score Kohli managed in WT20 2024 and how Bumrah's mastercalss needed to save India. I would take Gambhir's 97 in the WC Final over the 700 runs Kohli accumulated in the ODI WC but when he really needed to put up a score he failed. It was no different than his Perth 100 coming in at 300/2 and scoring that impactless 100. Scoring cheap runs coming in the wake of Rohit taking apart the bowling or when Shami, Bumrah and bowlers had already kept opponent to a lowish total isn't something to be proud of. He had a chance to make the difference in the final and he showed his true colors as usual. It's similar to Kohli's Test runs - couldn't win even a single Away Test but never missed an opportunity to score cheap runs. When someone like Shardul Thakur has more of an impact in Away Test than "King" Kohli, that says it all.

Yes, both Shardul and Kohli have more impact than Gambhir in away tests.

 

Secondly, when I am talking about selection and non selection, you are turning this into a Gambhir vs Kohli fight and that too as a batsman, which is not even debatable.

 

Lets focus on why Gambhir the so called team man and superstar eliminator has failed to make the hard move, also the results after his selection are out there for all of us to see, till now he has completely failed in his duries as a coach, and has shown why he will always be a bootlicker to both the senior folks. Everyone is a gangsta until the real gangsta arrives, your Gambhir has sucked ass and you need to chin up and face the truth.

 

Gambhirs wt20 final knock was saved by a Misbah brainfade, if we are discussing hypotheticals then I can do that too.


Finally, what matters is the legacy you leave, no one will remember Gambhir who was not even the tenth popular player in his team, on the other hand Kohli has reigned supreme as the biggest superstar, he has defeated Gambhir in everything that matters.

Posted

Literally non issue. Many of jingoistic politicians' (Politicians who are revered here) kids are settled in UK US Australia whose parents are making money here. Maybe Mrs Kohli has set up business there, otherwise I can't find any reason.. Anyway Good luck to both.

Posted

Good for him..A large majority of Indians would readily move out of India if given the right opportunity. Why would you want to subject your family to a world of corruption,  pollution, poor infrastructure,  judgmental people and never ending rat race?

Posted
7 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

He can go wherever the * he wants...just he and his wife need to stop giving gyan on "how to celebrate Hindu festivals".

 

He is a cricketer, not an expert on religious festivals...he can do his advertising by selling MRF ZLX tyres or Livspace wooden furniture.

People need to make response reels on those gyan cringefests saying.

Chaa Mudao
spacer.png

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, dilliboy said:

Good for him..A large majority of Indians would readily move out of India if given the right opportunity. Why would you want to subject your family to a world of corruption,  pollution, poor infrastructure,  judgmental people and never ending rat race?

Kohli must be wanting to say this to all the NRIs :)

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZOpIQtL7h4&t=155s

 

Edited by vvvslaxman
Posted

I think people are missing the point here. Comparing Kohli to the NRIs on this forum is an inaccurate analogy. Kohli is an active cricketer playing for India, so he should live in the same environment, play domestic matches if required, and bond with the team. Instead, he lives in the UK, never plays any domestic games, doesn't travel with the team, uses a private jet, and is still the first name on the team sheet series after series, despite underperforming for years. This can be uninspiring for many cricketers who toil hard in India. He can surely live anywhere in his personal life but when he plays for India he is a public figure.

Posted
6 hours ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

I think people are missing the point here. Comparing Kohli to the NRIs on this forum is an inaccurate analogy. Kohli is an active cricketer playing for India, so he should live in the same environment, play domestic matches if required, and bond with the team. Instead, he lives in the UK, never plays any domestic games, doesn't travel with the team, uses a private jet, and is still the first name on the team sheet series after series, despite underperforming for years. This can be uninspiring for many cricketers who toil hard in India. He can surely live anywhere in his personal life but when he plays for India he is a public figure.

 

Kohli has treated Indian cricket as his personal fiefdom and BCCI has allowed it to happen. This is what you get when you have nepo babies like Jay Shah run BCCI and Indian cricket. Nobody can really do anything. Likes of Kohli and Rohit can drop out from a series as they wish, get back into the team if they feel like it. And performance doesn't come into the equation at all.

 

For more than 5 years the bowlers and lower order have been carrying the team and they are dropped on the back of one bad series or a bad match. And yet the eternal failures who've been dragging the team down for more than half a decade are still the first names on the sheet! And then we wonder why we don't dominate cricket or win like Aussies :laugh:

Posted
On 12/24/2024 at 11:41 AM, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Kohli has treated Indian cricket as his personal fiefdom and BCCI has allowed it to happen. This is what you get when you have nepo babies like Jay Shah run BCCI and Indian cricket. Nobody can really do anything. Likes of Kohli and Rohit can drop out from a series as they wish, get back into the team if they feel like it. And performance doesn't come into the equation at all.

 

For more than 5 years the bowlers and lower order have been carrying the team and they are dropped on the back of one bad series or a bad match. And yet the eternal failures who've been dragging the team down for more than half a decade are still the first names on the sheet! And then we wonder why we don't dominate cricket or win like Aussies :laugh:

BCCI loves the assertive types like Kaiser Kohli who dominate it.

Posted
On 12/24/2024 at 3:43 PM, Chaos said:

How he settled down… he became an absolute Greatest fisherman of our age

Also the greatest Flasher (of balls outside off) of our age.

Posted
Just now, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Indian cricket and true cricket fans have ended up paying the price.

Fortunately, in India, such fans are <1% of the total cricket watchers. In my generation, the corresponding fraction was at least 25%.

Posted
Just now, Vijy said:

Fortunately, in India, such fans are <1% of the total cricket watchers. In my generation, the corresponding fraction was at least 25%.

 

It has always been like that. I'm sure we had Gavaskar and Kapil fans earlier. Then we got Tendulkar fans followed by Dhoni fans and now to Kohli and Rohit ones. Maybe in the future we'll have fans of Gill, Jaiswal and other batters.

 

I think that's something in our culture - we always want to have stars around or want to make someone a star. Look at our movies or politicians. It's always about individuals. never about the team or the political party etc. We follow our cricket the same way.

 

I don't see this in western nations. They like their stars - sports or movies - but not to the extent we do. In fact in sports they would rather kick out an underperforming star in an instant. Look at how Tom Brady was let go by New England Pats or Peyton Manning was shipped to Broncos by Colts or the way 49ers traded Joe Montana to Chiefs when he was past it. They don't suffer non-performance at all and in fact kick out stars earlier than they should in most cases.

 

If Indian cricket was run the same way as NFL or other professional sports franchises are run in North America, Kohli would've been let go in 2020 and Rohit wouldn't have anywhere the career he had with the Indian team.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

It has always been like that. I'm sure we had Gavaskar and Kapil fans earlier. Then we got Tendulkar fans followed by Dhoni fans and now to Kohli and Rohit ones. Maybe in the future we'll have fans of Gill, Jaiswal and other batters.

 

I think that's something in our culture - we always want to have stars around or want to make someone a star. Look at our movies or politicians. It's always about individuals. never about the team or the political party etc. We follow our cricket the same way.

 

I don't see this in western nations. They like their stars - sports or movies - but not to the extent we do. In fact in sports they would rather kick out an underperforming star in an instant. Look at how Tom Brady was let go by New England Pats or Peyton Manning was shipped to Broncos by Colts or the way 49ers traded Joe Montana to Chiefs when he was past it. They don't suffer non-performance at all and in fact kick out stars earlier than they should in most cases.

 

If Indian cricket was run the same way as NFL or other professional sports franchises are run in North America, Kohli would've been let go in 2020 and Rohit wouldn't have anywhere the career he had with the Indian team.

Since I am from that period, I can tell you that the level of fandom was much lower. It really got kickstarted in the SRT era and accelerated from Dhoni onwards

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...