Ultimate_Game Posted June 21 Posted June 21 (edited) Duplicate thread. Please merge with Edited June 21 by Ultimate_Game
Ultimate_Game Posted June 21 Author Posted June 21 Mods, please merge this thread with this one... missed it
Adamant Posted June 21 Posted June 21 Should be there in the squad atleast. Looks like selectors are afraid that he will outscore Rohit. Manucrick, Lord and tapandrun 3
bowl_out Posted June 21 Posted June 21 Honestly, Jaiswal can't make the squad till Rohit is there. Kishan comes in as that one back up batter who can fit anywhere from 1-5 and a back up keeper. Nitish will play at 6. He might eventually make the WC squad and be a back up for Hardik. Axar will play at 7. Washi is his back up Harshit will play at 8, followed by 3 more quicks. This looks close to the final WC squad. I suspect they'll dump Kuldeep when Hardik returns. tapandrun and Ultimate_Game 1 1
vvvslaxman Posted June 21 Posted June 21 This is the same sh** happened to ishan himself. Dropped right after 210. Kully dropped right after man of the match award. BacktoCricaddict, Norman, Pratik77 and 2 others 1 1 2 1
Gollum Posted June 21 Posted June 21 (edited) Rohit is so selfish, wants to play a WC in his 40s. His PR is so active these days. He is no Kohli, fitnesswise or even when it comes to record in RSA. He ruined our BGT and now wants to ruin our WC. Edited June 21 by Gollum Sean Bradley, Vancouver, Lord and 5 others 2 6
Gollum Posted June 21 Posted June 21 Kohli in 27 WC will be younger than present Rohit. Unfair to lump him with Rohit and people like Jaddu, KL. Team should carry only one 35+ guy in the WC, and that is mostly Kohli. If he suddenly loses his hand-eye few months before WC, can look past him then. Otherwise he should be in the scheme of things. Norman, BacktoCricaddict, Adamant and 2 others 5
vvvslaxman Posted June 21 Posted June 21 6 minutes ago, Gollum said: Rohit is so selfish, wants to play a WC in his 40s. His PR is so active these days. He is no Kohli, fitnesswise or even when it comes to record in RSA. He ruined our BGT and now wants to ruin our WC. Ayush mhatre had just made 186 in the vijay hazare. When BCCI told Rohit and Kohli to play domestic. Rohit played for Mumbai. They dropped Ayush. Rohit had 100 trial matches before even doing something in ODI. These guys barely get 1 or 2 matches.
Ultimate_Game Posted June 21 Author Posted June 21 1 hour ago, Gollum said: Rohit is so selfish, wants to play a WC in his 40s. His PR is so active these days. He is no Kohli, fitnesswise or even when it comes to record in RSA. He ruined our BGT and now wants to ruin our WC. What he did in BGT - rocking up and destroying a winning team and then giving a mid pitch PR interview during the lunch break - was disgusting. Should've been kicked out right after. And here we are dropping Jaiswal for this 40 year old has been. Gollum, Lord, cricspirit and 2 others 5
Ultimate_Game Posted June 21 Author Posted June 21 1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said: Ayush mhatre had just made 186 in the vijay hazare. When BCCI told Rohit and Kohli to play domestic. Rohit played for Mumbai. They dropped Ayush. Rohit had 100 trial matches before even doing something in ODI. These guys barely get 1 or 2 matches. Ayush should've played. He's the future. They should've dropped someone else like Rahane (if he's still playing) or any other player unlikely to make it to Indian team. But yeah the entitlement from our stars knows no bounds. At some point someone will have to say enough is enough and kick them out. Gollum 1
bowl_out Posted June 21 Posted June 21 People clamoring for Jaiswal, pls give a reasonable plan to where he can play till Rohit exists and plays. I know if it frustrating to see Jaiswal sit out, but claims that he should play at 5/6 or just be part of the squad look hollow. Ideally, Rohit should have retired from ODI as well and Jaiswal should have come in his place. But now that Rohit is not going, and has the backing of the TM and the board, unfortunately, Jaiswal's return to ODI will only happen after 2027 or if there are injuries. tapandrun 1
The Realist Posted June 21 Posted June 21 10 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said: Ayush should've played. He's the future. They should've dropped someone else like Rahane (if he's still playing) or any other player unlikely to make it to Indian team. But yeah the entitlement from our stars knows no bounds. At some point someone will have to say enough is enough and kick them out. That is never happening. This is not the Australian selection panel. Ultimate_Game 1
Lord Posted June 21 Posted June 21 1 hour ago, Gollum said: Rohit is so selfish, wants to play a WC in his 40s. His PR is so active these days. He is no Kohli, fitnesswise or even when it comes to record in RSA. He ruined our BGT and now wants to ruin our WC. Funnily he is called selfless for his quick cameos. Even in 23 final he should have converted his start. Quick cameos are not enough for seniors in Odis putrevus and Gollum 2
Norman Posted June 21 Posted June 21 The same thing is going to happen to Rohith Sharma as what is currently happening to Ronaldo at the World Cup. Gollum, express bowling and tapandrun 3
tapandrun Posted June 21 Posted June 21 (edited) 7 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: Ayush mhatre had just made 186 in the vijay hazare. When BCCI told Rohit and Kohli to play domestic. Rohit played for Mumbai. They dropped Ayush. Rohit had 100 trial matches before even doing something in ODI. These guys barely get 1 or 2 matches. This is nothing new, its a by-product of when an intnl player plays for their domestic side, some1 has to be removed from playing 11 and its most likely be a new player. and the decision is not made by rohit , its would have been done by mbi tm coaches and captain Edited June 22 by tapandrun express bowling 1
wanted_desi Posted June 21 Posted June 21 Rohit should be more scared of Vaibhav Suryavanshi. He is going to break the doors to get into the team. 15 Months is enough time for him to do so. You can keep Jaiswal away, but it would be so hard to keep Vaibhav. cricspirit, tapandrun, Manucrick and 2 others 5
Ultimate_Game Posted June 22 Author Posted June 22 1 hour ago, wanted_desi said: Rohit should be more scared of Vaibhav Suryavanshi. He is going to break the doors to get into the team. 15 Months is enough time for him to do so. You can keep Jaiswal away, but it would be so hard to keep Vaibhav. Don't under-estimate BCCI and our selectors. They'll come up any excuse to keep Rohit and Kohli in the team. The reason they'll come up with is there's not enough time to make a change. They've already kept Jaiswal out of the T20 team when Jaiswal had the best stats in T20, and kicked him out of ODIs when Jaiswal averages 71 with 2 100s in just 6 ODIs. So why can't they keep Sooryavanshi out as well?
tapandrun Posted June 22 Posted June 22 (edited) 7 hours ago, bowl_out said: Honestly, Jaiswal can't make the squad till Rohit is there. Kishan comes in as that one back up batter who can fit anywhere from 1-5 and a back up keeper. Nitish will play at 6. He might eventually make the WC squad and be a back up for Hardik. Axar will play at 7. Washi is his back up Harshit will play at 8, followed by 3 more quicks. This looks close to the final WC squad. I suspect they'll dump Kuldeep when Hardik returns. It will be between kuldeep and Sundar, But this properly summed-up the situation,-if they think Kishan can play in SA condition then he double as back-up wk and opener. The idea is quite same as that was in 2024 t20i wc, if rohit and kolhi are playing they will play all the games in the world up regardless of the form like they carried kolhi till the finals. So there is no need of a designated back-up opener and ppl keep forgetting that kl can be an opener too if needed and kishan can be slotted in as mo batter. This whole idea of kl+kishan opens up a slot in playing 11 of having 1 extra bowler or an allrounder , adding Nithish adds bit of fire power down the order and also removes a full 10 over quota responsibility from hardik. The back-up opener is not the primary concern for the team is lack of 6th bowler and fire-power. Amongst KL/Rohit/Gill/Kishan Ind is already carrying 4 openers. And amongst Gill/Kolhi/Kishan/Iyer there are 4 options for #3/4. Its v.clear what tm is trying. Having both rohit and jaiswal does not solve many problems he can just open and they donot want 2 players with same role. Edited June 22 by tapandrun bowl_out and express bowling 2
Nikhil_cric Posted June 22 Posted June 22 8 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: This is the same sh** happened to ishan himself. Dropped right after 210. Kully dropped right after man of the match award. No. Ishan was dropped because for the next 17 matches, he averaged 35 with the bat and then tried to avoid domestic cricket or some shenanigans. He wasn't dropped right after the 210 rollingstoned, tapandrun, Manucrick and 1 other 1 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now