Jump to content

Dhoni at no. 4 complicating things..


PSB_Zone

Recommended Posts

Posted

Gone is the time when MSd was suited to bat at any position...I don't think he has the same luxury now..

If dhawan and Rohit are opening
KL rahul, Manish, Uv even Rahane all can only bat at No. 4
And thus only 1 can play out of abv 4..If dhawan droped and rahul
open, then only manish comes in.
They all will be just wasted if they are batted below No. 4

We still don't hv No. 5 and 6 . So if Dhoni want to play No. 5
is the position for him with special instruction of being aggressive
As far as no. 6 is concern I cant see any one but Suresh Raina  

Idealy there is no place of Msd in one-day as well as we should now
play Raina at 5 and a dasher like Pant at 6. Raina is important coz of experience.

Dhawan/rohit/kohli/rahul/raina/pant
or
rahul/rohit/kohli/manish/raina/pant

Posted

Dhoni is a better batsman than than all of the options mention at no.4 .So if he prefers to bat at no.4 considering he is still India's second best bat after Kohli,he will naturally bat at 4.

 

If others are not suited to any position other than no.4 ,then they either need to adopt their game or we will have to find better options at no.5 and 6.

 

The only question is whether Dhoni has the ability to go big once he settles in .IF he cant then he should retire.But he deserves a few matches at no.4 to decide how he goes.If he struggles badly at no.4 ,which I dont he he will,they Dhoni should in honesty be dropped from the team.He simply isnt suited to bat at 6 nowadays .

 

Either way Dhoni @ 4 and Rahul @ 5 is the best option for our ODI team.The likes of Yuvi and Rania should have no business in the ODI team.

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said:

Dhoni is a better batsman than than all of the options mention at no.4 .So if he prefers to bat at no.4 considering he is still India's second best bat after Kohli,he will naturally bat at 4.

 

If others are not suited to any position other than no.4 ,then they either need to adopt their game or we will have to find better options at no.5 and 6.

 

The only question is whether Dhoni has the ability to go big once he settles in .IF he cant then he should retire.But he deserves a few matches at no.4 to decide how he goes.If he struggles badly at no.4 ,which I dont he he will,they Dhoni should in honesty be dropped from the team.He simply isnt suited to bat at 6 nowadays .

 

Either way Dhoni @ 4 and Rahul @ 5 is the best option for our ODI team.The likes of Yuvi and Rania should have no business in the ODI team.

 

 

Dhoni averages 38 in last two years, so, he isn't the second best. He is only better than Rahane.

Posted
15 minutes ago, PSB_Zone said:

Gone is the time when MSd was suited to bat at any position...I don't think he has the same luxury now..

If dhawan and Rohit are opening
KL rahul, Manish, Uv even Rahane all can only bat at No. 4
And thus only 1 can play out of abv 4..If dhawan droped and rahul
open, then only manish comes in.
They all will be just wasted if they are batted below No. 4

We still don't hv No. 5 and 6 . So if Dhoni want to play No. 5
is the position for him with special instruction of being aggressive
As far as no. 6 is concern I cant see any one but Suresh Raina  

Idealy there is no place of Msd in one-day as well as we should now
play Raina at 5 and a dasher like Pant at 6. Raina is important coz of experience.

Dhawan/rohit/kohli/rahul/raina/pant
or
rahul/rohit/kohli/manish/raina/pant

Rahul can possibly bat at any position.

Posted

Rahul can surely bat at a lower position.. 

Of the options you mentioned, here is how I see it:

 

No. 1,2,3 - Rohit, Dhawan, Kohli - nothing changes here

No.4 - Pandey.. huge potential. got a 100 while chasing in Australia.. needs a longer run at this position

No.5 - Dhoni - opportunity to build the innings when required or be an aggressor if the situation demands

No. 6 - Rahul - has a variety of strokeplay and the aggression needed down the order.. has shown he can play down the order in the IPL

No. 7 - Pandya - groom him to be a hitter finisher along with Rahul

No. 8/9 - Jadeja, Ashwin/Mishra

No. 10, 11 - Umesh/Bhuvi , Bumrah

Posted
9 minutes ago, bowl_out said:

Rahul can surely bat at a lower position.. 

Of the options you mentioned, here is how I see it:

 

No. 1,2,3 - Rohit, Dhawan, Kohli - nothing changes here

No.4 - Pandey.. huge potential. got a 100 while chasing in Australia.. needs a longer run at this position

No.5 - Dhoni - opportunity to build the innings when required or be an aggressor if the situation demands

No. 6 - Rahul - has a variety of strokeplay and the aggression needed down the order.. has shown he can play down the order in the IPL

No. 7 - Pandya - groom him to be a hitter finisher along with Rahul

No. 8/9 - Jadeja, Ashwin/Mishra

No. 10, 11 - Umesh/Bhuvi , Bumrah

Ask urself without being emotional..
Can dhoni bat ahead of rahul?
Why not no. 5 for Rahul. He is great talent .At 6 will be a waste.
 

Posted

We will have to see how this goes,in the three innings he played at no.4 against New Zealand one was scratchy,one was sublime and one was downright pathetic.Deserves a run at no.4 thats for sure.

Posted

Dhoni to me, regardless of whatever numbers you want to share from last 2 years, is still our 2nd best batsman after Kohli.

 

I will give him any position in the middle order regardless of where he wants. If he wants 5, I will give him 5. Same thing for Kohli, if he wants to bat at 4, I will give him four as I trust the guy's ability to make the game and want to make sure they are given what they need as they have bailed us out from many crazy situations before and they know what they are doing when asking for a certain postion in the middle order.

 

So my order will always be Kohli at 3, and Dhoni at 4.

Posted
5 minutes ago, PSB_Zone said:

Ask urself without being emotional..
Can dhoni bat ahead of rahul?
Why not no. 5 for Rahul. He is great talent .At 6 will be a waste.
 

Rahul can bat at 4, but I want Rahul to earn it. He has still played 3 games. He has earned a slot in the INdian team, but Dhoni is the senior and deserves to play higher. If Rahul does outstandingly and Dhoni fails miserably, we can always have Rahul at 4 in future right after Kohli. But for now he remains our opener with no Rohit around.

Posted
1 minute ago, BeautifulGame said:

Thats because he batted most of last 2 years at no.6

 

source

The fact that we are questioning Dhoni's batting is something wrong. He is clearly the best man to come after Kohli, someone I would depend on. Yes, we need to develop players for the future etc, but no. 5 and no. 6 are there for that.

Posted
24 minutes ago, bowl_out said:

 

 

 

No.4 - Pandey.. huge potential. got a 100 while chasing in Australia.. needs a longer run at this position

 

Pandey takes too much risks and plays like all or nothing batsman and even his big shots are risky airy shots..Not good enough for no.4 .The way he batted in the Newzealand series was a serious let down.Even if there is no Dhoni,it should be Rahul at 4 and no way he should bat below Pandey.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

Dhoni averages 38 in last two years, so, he isn't the second best. He is only better than Rahane.

Yes....and excluding Zim it drops to 34.7.     Another worry is his SR in this period which has gone down from 89 to 82  in an era of  increasing SRs.

 

Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS AveDescending BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
RG Sharma 2015-2016 24 24 1 1242 171* 54.00 1304 95.24 5 4 2 106 38 investigate this query
V Kohli 2015-2016 27 27 3 1247 154* 51.95 1381 90.29 5 5 0 93 15 investigate this query
S Dhawan 2015-2016 22 22 0 914 137 41.54 1036 88.22 2 6 0 108 9 investigate this query
AM Rahane 2015-2016 24 23 1 842 89 38.27 1041 80.88 0 8 1 71 13 investigate this query
MS Dhoni 2015-2016 27 26 2 833 92* 34.70 1008 82.63 0 4 1 60 18 investigate this query
SK Raina 2015-2015 17 16 0 407 74 25.43 416 97.83 0 4 2 33 10

 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=25;opposition=3;opposition=4;opposition=5;opposition=6;opposition=7;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=200;qualval1=runs;spanmax1=08+Jan+2017;spanmin1=08+Jan+2015;spanval1=span;team=6;template=results;type=batting

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Yes....and excluding Zim it drops to 34.7.     Another worry is his SR in this period which has gone down from 89 to 82  in an era of  increasing SRs.

 

Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS AveDescending BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
RG Sharma 2015-2016 24 24 1 1242 171* 54.00 1304 95.24 5 4 2 106 38 investigate this query
V Kohli 2015-2016 27 27 3 1247 154* 51.95 1381 90.29 5 5 0 93 15 investigate this query
S Dhawan 2015-2016 22 22 0 914 137 41.54 1036 88.22 2 6 0 108 9 investigate this query
AM Rahane 2015-2016 24 23 1 842 89 38.27 1041 80.88 0 8 1 71 13 investigate this query
MS Dhoni 2015-2016 27 26 2 833 92* 34.70 1008 82.63 0 4 1 60 18 investigate this query
SK Raina 2015-2015 17 16 0 407 74 25.43 416 97.83 0 4 2 33 10

 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;filter=advanced;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=25;opposition=3;opposition=4;opposition=5;opposition=6;opposition=7;orderby=batting_average;qualmin1=200;qualval1=runs;spanmax1=08+Jan+2017;spanmin1=08+Jan+2015;spanval1=span;team=6;template=results;type=batting

 

Stats just prove that Indian batting has struggled a lot and hence Dhoni can not continue to play the same game as you expect him to do.

 

Stats also prove like you said that Dhoni has struggle too. Yes, no doubt about that he has compared to his past.

 

Yes, he might not be the same big massive hitter, but he can not produce a more than run a ball, or run a ball inning every time, when we have struggled. We have lost plenty of games in last 2-3 years and our whole batting has been part of that problem, along with of course our bowling.

 

If Kohli or Sharma would have gone early, we have struggled fair bit and that has put plenty of pressure on Dhoni to keep his wicket and ensure he doesn't get out early to spark a collapse. This is actually the prime reason why he wants to come at no. 4 and give a better hand to Kohl, as they need someone solid in the middle order, as he as already scored lot of runs.

 

Anyways, the game has changed, as long as you can keep your wickets till 35th over, you can always score runs in the end, and that is what we are trying to do with Dhoni at 4 and Kohli at 3. If both of these guys are set till 35th over, we are looking at chasing most games successfully or setting up bigger totals.

 

 

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, laaloo said:

82 is a pretty piss poor strike rate considering Dhoni bats at 5/6. Some of ICFers are still stuck in 2011.

How right you are ......these are are SRs of batsmen at No.5 to No.7 positions in ODIs  in the last 2 years ( excluding minnow oppositions )

 

In these positions Dhoni has SR of 86.95  and there are 8 batters between 101 to 146.  Sort of proves that he has to come in at No.4 and no later these days.

 

 

Overall figures
Player Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SRDescending 100 50 0 4s 6s  
AB de Villiers (SA) 2015-2016 9 8 4 455 162* 113.75 311 146.30 2 2 0 46 18 investigate this query
GJ Maxwell (AUS) 2015-2016 26 23 3 759 102 37.95 603 125.87 1 4 4 87 18 investigate this query
L Ronchi (NZ) 2015-2016 39 31 4 553 170* 20.48 473 116.91 1 0 5 44 21 investigate this query
JC Buttler (ENG) 2015-2016 31 26 4 880 129 40.00 787 111.81 1 6 2 79 18 investigate this query
DA Miller (SA) 2015-2016 23 20 4 656 130* 41.00 597 109.88 2 1 2 60 16 investigate this query
MS Wade (AUS) 2015-2016 28 23 5 652 76 36.22 612 106.53 0 5 0 52 17 investigate this query
BA Stokes (ENG) 2015-2016 23 22 3 752 101 39.57 723 104.01 1 5 2 66 23 investigate this query
Shoaib Malik (PAK) 2015-2016 13 13 3 373 55* 37.30 368 101.35 0 3 0 22 13 investigate this query
GD Elliott (NZ) 2015-2016 27 25 5 836 104* 41.80 839 99.64 1 5 2 65 20 investigate this query
MR Marsh (AUS) 2015-2016 29 26 6 786 102* 39.30 797 98.61 1 6 3 75 19 investigate this query
Mohammad Rizwan (PAK) 2015-2016 17 16 4 326 67 27.16 347 93.94 0 2 0 31 3 investigate this query
SK Raina (INDIA) 2015-2015 15 14 0 332 65 23.71 355 93.52 0 3 2 28 7 investigate this query
CJ Anderson (NZ) 2015-2016 24 22 1 552 81 26.28 602 91.69 0 3 2 48 20 investigate this query
Sarfraz Ahmed (PAK) 2015-2016 16 14 2 590 105 49.16 646 91.33 1 4 0 46 1 investigate this query
Mushfiqur Rahim (BDESH) 2015-2016 11 9 2 333 89 47.57 367 90.73 0 2 0 26 3 investigate this query
F Behardien (SA) 2015-2016 31 25 8 545 70 32.05 623 87.47 0 2 1 37 11 investigate this query
MS Dhoni (INDIA) 2015-2016 19 18 2 520 92* 32.50 598 86.95 0 2 0 35 12 investigate this query
Shakib Al Hasan (BDESH) 2015-2016 19 17 3 460 79 32.85 533 86.30 0 4 0 44 4 investigate this query
SC Williams (ZIM) 2015-2016 15 14 1 365 76 28.07 426 85.68 0 3 2 28 4 investigate this query
Sikandar Raza (ZIM) 2015-2016 19 17 3 519 100* 37.07 625 83.04 2 1 0 34 13 investigate this query
AD Mathews (SL) 2015-2016 28 22 4 757 95 42.05 912 83.00 0 6 3 61 8 investigate this query
TM Head (AUS) 2016-2016 13 13 0 359 52 27.61 451 79.60 0 2 1 34 3 investigate this query
JP Duminy (SA) 2015-2016 26 20 3 468 73 27.52 590 79.32 0 2 0 32 4 investigate this query
D Ramdin (WI) 2015-2016 20 20 0 486 91 24.30 639 76.05 0 3 2 31 9

 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?batting_positionmax1=7;batting_positionmin1=5;batting_positionval1=batting_position;class=2;filter=advanced;opposition=1;opposition=2;opposition=25;opposition=3;opposition=4;opposition=5;opposition=6;opposition=7;opposition=8;orderby=batting_strike_rate;qualmin1=300;qualval1=runs;spanmax1=08+Jan+2017;spanmin1=08+Jan+2015;spanval1=span;template=results;type=batting

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted

The strike rate of players who have been batting at 6 for the past two years. 

Capture.PNG

 

When batting at 4 - 8(mat) 39(ave) 76(SR)

At 5 - 8(mat) 38(ave) 96(SR)

 

Only at 5 he has shown some decent stats. Still an average of 38 is nothing to be proud of. He has been batting at where ever he wants like it's his personnel property. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...