Jump to content

Smith is "RATTLED"


Stuge

Recommended Posts

Posted

High time Kohli ,and company takes advantage of rattled Smith ,and make sure he remain rattled throughout 3rd test match .

Posted

Dont know about Smith, but India looks rattled in this series. Playing against a really ordinary side, they really look out of their depths in home conditions. Probably this victory is turning point. 

 

But this series, so far, has already been a win for Aussies. If I was an aussie supporter, there is a lot to like about this perfomance on these pitches.

Posted

As an aussie i expected a whitewash, a dour performance and overall decimation and underperforming in general.

 

In truth the aussies have battled hard against a superior side away from home. Arguably performed much better with more conviction.

 

"Smith is rattled" is an ignorant statement unless he and the team stop playing in the same manner. Being beaten in those circumstances hardly means much.

 

If you want to see what rattled looks like. Maybe its actually kohli more so than smith.

Posted
17 minutes ago, ravishingravi said:

Dont know about Smith, but India looks rattled in this series. Playing against a really ordinary side, they really look out of their depths in home conditions. Probably this victory is turning point. 

 

But this series, so far, has already been a win for Aussies. If I was an aussie supporter, there is a lot to like about this perfomance on these pitches.

'Ordinary' ? with that bowling attack and with Smith, Renshaw and Warner?

Posted

Aussies seem an ordinary side coz we did not know of newbies who well might turn out to be very good Renshaw n Handscombe, Smith was expected to do well n Warner underwhelmed, but Marsh was a bad choice especially with the bowling as we now know he was carrying n injury, Lyon did very well, this side will get better from now on as they have Pattinson, Cummings, when fit but will get better from now on

Posted
30 minutes ago, ravishingravi said:

Dont know about Smith, but India looks rattled in this series. Playing against a really ordinary side, they really look out of their depths in home conditions. Probably this victory is turning point. 

 

But this series, so far, has already been a win for Aussies. If I was an aussie supporter, there is a lot to like about this perfomance on these pitches.

you think Indian team is filled with greats?

Posted

Aus were number 2 before this test series started. Its not as if they were languishing at the bottom.

 

Lyon and our inability to play him is the key issue

 

Sent from my Wileyfox Swift using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

This Aussie team is shaping into an excellent team. Wait for 2 years, they will do very well in UAE, Lanka, Eng etc. Renshaw, Handscombe etc will develop into very good players. Aussies aren't like other teams, they never get rattled. We will have to be very sharp in the next 2 matches.

Posted
you think Indian team is filled with greats?

 

This virtuly same Indian side (apart from past it Sachin) whitewashed Aussies .

 

So another 4-0 was along expected linesm

Posted
7 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said:

 

This virtuly same Indian side (apart from past it Sachin) whitewashed Aussies .

 

So another 4-0 was along expected linesm

But this Aussie team is stronger especially after the revamp following their debacle against RSA last year.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Gollum said:

But this Aussie team is stronger especially after the revamp following their debacle against RSA last year.

What revamp ? For four of them, it is their second series. For some of them first India test series. They have done brilliantly. India looks shoddy even on rank turners. One partnership saved India or it was 2-0.

 

Anyhow, I love how Aussies have fought in this series.

Posted
1 minute ago, ravishingravi said:

What revamp ? For four of them, it is their second series. For some of them first India test series. They have done brilliantly. India looks shoddy even on rank turners. One partnership saved India or it was 2-0.

 

Anyhow, I love how Aussies have fought in this series.

Every team looks shoddy on rank turners. Even our greatest of the batsmen. Thing is we barely had such pitches in 2000s or most part of 90s. IN 2000s, I remember very few such pitches that ICC had to issue warning. One was Mumbai 2004 and  you know how our batsmen fared in that, gave a 6-fer to Clark.

Posted
Every team looks shoddy on rank turners. Even our greatest of the batsmen. Thing is we barely had such pitches in 2000s or most part of 90s. IN 2000s, I remember very few such pitches that ICC had to issue warning. One was Mumbai 2004 and  you know how our batsmen fared in that, gave a 6-fer to Clark.

 

Mumbai was far worse than anything we have seen in this series .

 

And we have plenty of these wickets in 90s like these under Azhar.

Posted
45 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said:

 

This virtuly same Indian side (apart from past it Sachin) whitewashed Aussies .

 

So another 4-0 was along expected linesm

Every series is different. Form is different. Conditions are different. Just because Australia lost 4-0 4 years back doesn't mean, it will happen again too. There is no certainty about anything in this world. We were supposed to beat England too in 2012 after beating NZ easily but lost.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, BeautifulGame said:

 

Mumbai was far worse than anything we have seen in this series .

 

And we have plenty of these wickets in 90s like these under Azhar.

No. Mumbai was not worse than what we saw in Pune. Both pitches with red soil that have similar nature. 

 

regarding 90s, it is just a myth. We did not have plenty of such pitches in 90s. Otherwise, Kumble would have been ahead of Warne and Murli in wicket tally.

Edited by rkt.india
Posted
1 hour ago, Fool said:

As an aussie i expected a whitewash, a dour performance and overall decimation and underperforming in general.

 

In truth the aussies have battled hard against a superior side away from home. Arguably performed much better with more conviction.

 

"Smith is rattled" is an ignorant statement unless he and the team stop playing in the same manner. Being beaten in those circumstances hardly means much.

 

If you want to see what rattled looks like. Maybe its actually kohli more so than smith.

Rattled seems like an appropriate word. Him trying to deflect blame and throwing his teammates Handscomb and Marsh under the bus are pretty strong signs that suggest he may be rattled. Got him on the back food, time for the screeching yorker.

Posted

http://www.espncricinfo.com/india-v-australia-2016-17/content/story/1085899.html

 

Team India, getting better and better with the mind games.  I love the Ash quote - lot of respect for Smithy, but he pulled off a junior cricket move - very "surprising".  Excellent choice of words. 

 

Quote

R Ashwin has said Steven Smith's look towards the Australian dressing room for DRS advice on day four of the Bengaluru Test was "completely unheard of". Speaking to his team-mate Cheteshwar Pujara in a bcci.tv video, Ashwin said the incident reminded him of his junior cricket days.

"Steven Smith actually turned back and asked the dressing room if he could take a review," Ashwin said. "That is completely unheard of. The last time I thought that to happen was in an Under-10 game, when my coach used to suggest where point fielders and cover fielders used to stand.

"It was really surprising. I have a lot of respect for Steven Smith, but that was very very surprising."

There was a lot of chat on the field between the Indian and Australian players through the Test match, and Ashwin and Pujara detailed specific instances during their conversation. Pujara said he had been in David Warner's ear, telling him about Ashwin's record against him. Ashwin ended the match having dismissed Warner in both innings - and nine times over his career.

"Well, see, they were talking a lot and probably sledging is something which, as a unit, we felt that we can give them back," Pujara said. "They were always under pressure when they walked in to bat, and I wanted to make sure their batsmen were thinking about it, especially David Warner. Whenever he walks in to bat, Ash [Ashwin] is always happy, so I always keep reminding him that Ash is the one who picks [up his wicket]."

After dismissing Mitchell Starc, Ashwin sent him off by repeatedly pointing to his own forehead - mimicking the gesture Starc had made after Abhinav Mukund had top-edged him for six in India's second innings.

"I saw yesterday, Abhi [Mukund] pulled Mitchell Starc for a six, he top-edged it for six," Ashwin said. "But yes, I don't think he was in any sort of hurry when he pulled that ball, and Mitchell Starc suggested that he would hit him on the helmet. I don't know, people generally have the habit of saying I'll hit you back on the helmet at Gabba.

"It doesn't matter, this is Bangalore, so I thought I must tell him that he got hit off me, in the first innings, on the helmet."

Pujara also revealed that he had batted with a sore neck while scoring 92 in India's second innings.

"It was my neck which was troubling me a lot," Pujara said. "To be honest, it was a serious issue when I went in to bat in the second innings. I would like to thank Patrick Farhart, our physio, who made it possible for me to bat, and bat at No. 3, because there was one stage where I felt I might not be able to bat No. 3 because my neck was really sore. But he worked on it and ultimately I achieved the goal for the team."

 

Posted

 

No. Mumbai was not worse than what we saw in Pune. Both pitches with red soil that have similar nature. 

 

 

 

 

No Mumbai was much worse as a test wicket.The rain made it even worse in first innings.

 

 

The match barely last 2 full days.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...