surajmal Posted April 7, 2017 Author Posted April 7, 2017 Could be one off. 60 tomahawk missiles? I am guessing that is US Navy taking care of their inventory.
Sajid_Rana Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 lol.After running from Afghanistan with the tail between their legs US now trying to show off their expensive toys in yet another country with hardly any decent army. himmat hai to Iran or Russia say panga lay kar dikhao
Muloghonto Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 2 hours ago, Sajid_Rana said: lol.After running from Afghanistan with the tail between their legs US now trying to show off their expensive toys in yet another country with hardly any decent army. himmat hai to Iran or Russia say panga lay kar dikhao Bhai, even India can conquer Iran in 2 months flat. America would probably take 3 weeks. Only problem with invading Iran is, they can close hormuz strait, which messes up US allies. Vilander and sandeep 2
sandeep Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 8 hours ago, Sajid_Rana said: lol.After running from Afghanistan with the tail between their legs US now trying to show off their expensive toys in yet another country with hardly any decent army. himmat hai to Iran or Russia say panga lay kar dikhao Typical. Stand on someone else's shoulder and crow. Himmat hai to khud Uncle Umreeka se panga le kar dikhao. Tabhi to phat jaati hai puri, aur uncle cheen ke pichwaade mein chup jaate ho. Laaloo, Vilander and maniac 3
chewy Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) sad no solid confirmation of who did the chemical attack and America has already dropped bombs there was similar outcry couple years back to bomb Syrian army but only for UN to confirm latter that the chemical attack was done by anti-Assad Syrian Rebels there is something fishy with this attack Edited April 7, 2017 by chewy randomGuy 1
Tibarn Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 Poor from Drumpf. The Americans in the last 3 elections have voted for the candidate less likely to commit to military action(s), but American war machine wins out in the end. Vilander and randomGuy 2
Laaloo Posted April 7, 2017 Posted April 7, 2017 1 hour ago, sandeep said: Typical. Stand on someone else's shoulder and crow. Himmat hai to khud Uncle Umreeka se panga le kar dikhao. Tabhi to phat jaati hai puri, aur uncle cheen ke pichwaade mein chup jaate ho. Well first these bhikharis have to decline the aid from the US. Amazing these people are badmouthing the same country that practically gives them billions of dollars of aid and gives shelter to their citizens so they can happily live in the US and drive cabs and live on food stamps. velu, sandeep and Vilander 3
Gollum Posted April 8, 2017 Posted April 8, 2017 Sickening tbh. Assad, Iran, Putin aren't the real enemies here. Assad is a secular leader who even visits churches weekly to stand by Syrian Christians. He takes care of all his people unlike his opponents who only know how to behead children. We need him in Syria to restore normalcy in West Asia. The common enemy here is radical Sunni Islam in its various forms and styles. Besides the chemical attack is likely a false flag. The doctor who made the video about it was tried for jihadi activities in UK, in fact many sources point him as an ISIS member. * POTUS, his supporters didn't vote him to power for this. He was supposed to be different from the war mongering and ISIS supporting Dems. I wanted USA to patch up with Russia under him but that has gone down the drain. More war....ISIS will get stronger.....more refugees....rinse...repeat. randomGuy, velu and Vilander 3
Muloghonto Posted April 8, 2017 Posted April 8, 2017 ^ Russia will never patch up with US. Because US included the Baltic nations in NATO as soon as USSR was over. So there are US soldiers sitting on the Russian border as 'NATO troops'. Russia sees this as 'invasion of sphere of influence'. This is why they went and destabilized Ukraine because Ukraine was trying to join the EU and also wanting to join NATO. But at the same time, Russia knows its not strong enough to go straight up against US or China, so Russia is interested in creating a 'multi-polar world'. sandeep 1
Mariyam Posted April 8, 2017 Posted April 8, 2017 On 4/7/2017 at 9:18 AM, Sajid_Rana said: lol.After running from Afghanistan with the tail between their legs US now trying to show off their expensive toys in yet another country with hardly any decent army. himmat hai to Iran or Russia say panga lay kar dikhao Attacking Asad is taking panga with Iran.
Vilander Posted April 8, 2017 Posted April 8, 2017 So its rus chin iran pak v us saudi. So ind sits out.
Gollum Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 On 4/9/2017 at 1:08 AM, Vilander said: So its rus chin iran pak v us saudi. So ind sits out. Pak is small fish man. They will mostly sit it out, a terribly confused nation. Even China won't get involved in this mess. Only Iran and Russia are backing Assad. randomGuy and Vilander 2
Vilander Posted April 11, 2017 Posted April 11, 2017 17 hours ago, Gollum said: Pak is small fish man. They will mostly sit it out, a terribly confused nation. Even China won't get involved in this mess. Only Iran and Russia are backing Assad. Felt it as soon as I wrote it, Pak is too weak to matter.
Recommended Posts