Jump to content

Lessons to be learned from this series loss.


Recommended Posts

Lessons to be learnt 

1) stick with the same batting order ,give them confidence and belief that they are going to be the core of the team 

2) play with 5 bowlers ,the extra bowler I.e pandya will come handy in a long 4-5 match series where it can be exhausting for the pacers to bowl long spells ,they need to be kept fresh 

3) trust pandya and play him regularly @6 to build up his confidence on dry,Flattish wkt 

4) play only 4 seamers and the extra batsman if it's a green top .india have got 5 quality pacers 

5) get back saha and stop experimenting with ttf like pappu,kdk 

6) bat first whenever given a chance ,our batters can't chase or survive batting 4th 

 

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, narenpande1 said:

1) Dhawan & Rohit should never play an overseas test for India. They are not test standard batsmen in outside the subcontinent conditions. 

2) Kohli-Pujara-Rahane are the backbone of the Indian middle order and should be a permanent fixture in all tests.

3) Play at least 2 if not 3 practice games before the 1st test. Arrive 3 weeks before to get acclimatized to the alien conditions and put your heart out in net practice with local bowlers.

4) We need an average plus keeper who is a test standard batter for the long term. 

5) Hardik Pandya is NOT a test standard bowler. He can bowl a few overs. His batting is 50-50. We should play an extra batter or Jadeja/Ashwin in his place at all times in overseas conditions. (agreed unless he can show the ability to bat like in 1st inning of 1st test; then he lost his way)

6) Last inning shows that Shami can be a spearhead, but he needs to show it more consistently and fitness improvement will help. Team management needs to be give him an ultimatum on improving his fitness.

7) Team selection is important and it affected the outcome of the first two tests to some degree. Kohli needs to do that better, avoid starting/choppoing players which affects their confidence and constantly back players in his team.

 

 

 

Fixed with additional inputs. 

Edited by dandaroy
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Cricketics said:

Agreed with all the points,

 

 

adding number 6.

 

6.Be patient with the captain, he is the best we got and we will win big in England and Australia.

 

Boys played well

 

 

 

Unfortunately, that isn’t the true. He isn’t best we have got. He has some positives though. 

 

And no. We won’t win in England and Australia unless we prioritise our preparation. I can be supportive but not delusional. 

Link to comment
47 minutes ago, dandaroy said:

Fixed with additional inputs. 

     Why so many here saying Rohit & Dhavan should not play overseas. Are you alluding they should play in Asia only? Why ? 

     I think basis for test team should be who are your best bets for overseas tours and the same guys should be in your team for Asia

     also. 

     Why punish those guys who battle it out against pacy stuff in oversea conditions ?

     Do you think Rahane , KL will not fare well in Asia ?  They will 110% effort to remove their whatever weakness if they are given        confidence 

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, prudent_kreeda said:

     Why so many here saying Rohit & Dhavan should not play overseas. Are you alluding they should play in Asia only? Why ? 

     I think basis for test team should be who are your best bets for overseas tours and the same guys should be in your team for Asia

     also. 

     Why punish those guys who battle it out against pacy stuff in oversea conditions ?

     Do you think Rahane , KL will not fare well in Asia ?  They will 110% effort to remove their whatever weakness if they are given        confidence 

Ideally they should not be in the test team. This is especially true overseas.

Link to comment
5 hours ago, narenpande1 said:

1) Rohit should never play an overseas test for India. He is not a test standard batsman in outside the subcontinent conditions. 

2) Rahane unless he is woefully out of form should be a permanent fixture in overseas tests.

3) Play 2 practice games before the 1st test.

4) We need an average plus keeper who is a test standard batter for the long term. 

5) Hardik Pandya is NOT a test standard bowler. He can bowl a few overs. His batting is 50-50. We should play an extra batter or Jadeja/Ashwin in his place at all times in overseas conditions.

 

 

 

1 & 2  & 4 agreed. Play at the least 4 practice games atleast in  the most swing/seam conditions in India

Too early to write off Pandya.He should be given chances and confidence to play his natural game all the time.

Apart from Rohit,Pujara too should not be in team in  non asian conditions. Dhawan can be played in NZL.

 

 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said:

 

Apart from Rohit,Pujara too should not be in team in  non asian conditions. Dhawan can be played in NZL.

 

 

This is where the the huge problem comes. It is easier to say horses for courses and that Pujara has had bad average overseas so we should stick with him only at home and not pick him for overseas tours.  But the other thing is that how can we play Pujara at home all home season and just drop him for overseas and bring a new guy to play instead of him in England or Australia? That new guy will be basicaly coming without much match practice since Pujara was playing instead of him at home and hence will find hard to score on tough overseas tour and will likely not perform that easily as it looks like.

 

I think Pujara has sucked away from home but isn’t a bad option honestly.. We should closesly monitor his performance in England tour but we can’t afford to drop him at this time.

 

 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Cricketics said:

This is where the the huge problem comes. It is easier to say horses for courses and that Pujara has had bad average overseas so we should stick with him only at home and not pick him for overseas tours.  But the other thing is that how can we play Pujara at home all home season and just drop him for overseas and bring a new guy to play instead of him in England or Australia? That new guy will be basicaly coming without much match practice since Pujara was playing instead of him at home and hence will find hard to score on tough overseas tour and will likely not perform that easily as it looks like.

 

I think Pujara has sucked away from home but isn’t a bad option honestly.. We should closesly monitor his performance in England tour but we can’t afford to drop him at this time.

 

 

Yup. Horses for courses policy works for bowler-selection, not so much for batsman-selection.  It would be ridiculous to play Rohit Sharma on pattas, and replace him with Rahane as soon as there is some juice in the pitch.  

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Cricketics said:

This is where the the huge problem comes. It is easier to say horses for courses and that Pujara has had bad average overseas so we should stick with him only at home and not pick him for overseas tours.  But the other thing is that how can we play Pujara at home all home season and just drop him for overseas and bring a new guy to play instead of him in England or Australia? That new guy will be basicaly coming without much match practice since Pujara was playing instead of him at home and hence will find hard to score on tough overseas tour and will likely not perform that easily as it looks like.

 

I think Pujara has sucked away from home but isn’t a bad option honestly.. We should closesly monitor his performance in England tour but we can’t afford to drop him at this time.

 

 

Pujara seems to have no clue how to score runs in alien conditions,he tends to get into a hole we should try some one else and give him ample time to settle for Eng tour.We never had a batsman like Pujara ..Pujara s notion of batting is block block runout,caught etc

Edited by Suhaan
Link to comment
13 hours ago, Cricketics said:

This is where the the huge problem comes. It is easier to say horses for courses and that Pujara has had bad average overseas so we should stick with him only at home and not pick him for overseas tours.  But the other thing is that how can we play Pujara at home all home season and just drop him for overseas and bring a new guy to play instead of him in England or Australia? That new guy will be basicaly coming without much match practice since Pujara was playing instead of him at home and hence will find hard to score on tough overseas tour and will likely not perform that easily as it looks like.

 

I think Pujara has sucked away from home but isn’t a bad option honestly.. We should closesly monitor his performance in England tour but we can’t afford to drop him at this time.

 

 

'a  proven failure of 56 tests' in all alien conditions should be dropped at the earliest for ever from the team.As if there are no other young talents in domestic circuit.....We have all rounders & useful lower order batsmen  in Jadeja,Ashwin,Kuldeep,Pandya,Saha & Bhuvi to select from  apart from top 5 or 6 batsmen in any home match.Yet if we can't be dominant in home conditions ,we don't even deserve to play & compete.Having said that ,just because Pujara was so dominant  in Asia doesn't mean his replacement(if only  he is such a great talent and almost all conditional player) can't do at least in almost nearer levels to Pujara in Asian conditions.And that player would definitely be much much better to Pujara in alien conditions.But we should try to start finding that talented player rather than sticking with this proven one dimensional  failure with no strokes & even no common sense.

Link to comment

To add, atleast 2 high quality left handed batsmen  need to be in the batting line up.If it is 3, that much better.

Pujara sucks the whole momentum.He can't rotate strike apart from being mediocre in all alien countries.One down is the most important position in test cricket, job being not only play out new ball if opener falls early , but to  consolidate as well. And this use less hack is holding the most important position.Can't even score in county cricket.Now we expect him to score huge tons  against Anderson,Broad etc etc!!!!!!!!!!!!! Keep in mind he is no Dravid who straight away  adapted to English conditions like a 'duck into water '.

Edited by rtmohanlal
Link to comment

1) Rohit was given a long rope to cement his place ODI team. He should prove himself in county cricket. (I'm sure he will get offers if he prioritizes it. BCCI should give incentive by making it mandatory for test selection). Do not close the door on him.

2) Dhawan out. He might score a century by hacking/slashing once in 10 innings even in tough conditions but that is about it. Not worth investing.

3) Pandya out. In tests, either you should be a strike bowler who can bat a bit or a strike batsman who can bowl a bit. This should be the definition of all rounder. The emphasis on team balance as a reason to accommodate him looks good only on paper.

4) Saha is still the best wicketkeeper. He can take half chances which mean saving runs which in turn amounts to scoring runs. Parthiv is solid backup.

5) Last tour to England we suffered a few injuries to key bowlers so we should look for few more options.

6) IPL ends in may 27. Players who are in test fold and participate heavily in IPL must get sufficient rest before the tour.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...