Gollum Posted March 4, 2020 Author Posted March 4, 2020 1 minute ago, Stradlater said: Not a Baki. I can smell them from a mile away. Not saying he is, but I tend to put such posters on my ignore list. Saves time/energy. Stradlater 1
coffee_rules Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 (edited) 50 minutes ago, Stradlater said: Not a Baki. I can smell them from a mile away. Nah , he is Sree, a PIOI from NZ fed on liberal opEds. I like his travel logs. Edited March 4, 2020 by coffee_rules Stradlater 1
diga Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 35 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: Nah , he is Sree, a PIOI from NZ fed on liberal opEds. I like his travel logs. And a mallu Stradlater and coffee_rules 1 1
Muloghonto Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 2 hours ago, Stradlater said: @Gollum Mulo going all guns blazing on liberals. Never thought I would see this day in my stay period on icf. Thank You Modiji. I am a liberal dammit !! I just don’t acquesce to these postmodernist neoliberal punks who think they can play liberal by just blanket minority appeasement. coffee_rules, Laaloo, Stradlater and 1 other 4
First class Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 9 hours ago, Gollum said: Wonderful addition to this forum. The worst and weakest president we ever had. Clarke and Laaloo 2
LordPrabhzy Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 4 hours ago, Muloghonto said: I am a liberal dammit !! I just don’t acquesce to these postmodernist neoliberal punks who think they can play liberal by just blanket minority appeasement. The true definition of liberalism is being open and respectful of other views.. however neo 'liberals' cannot tolerate another viewpoint- that is fascism! Laaloo, raki05 and Gollum 3
Mariyam Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 37 minutes ago, LordPrabhzy said: The true definition of liberalism is being open and respectful of other views.. however neo 'liberals' cannot tolerate another viewpoint- that is fascism! What if one openly and respectfully disagrees with your true definition of liberalism. Would that make the person disagreeing a liberal? I'm confused. Iconoclast and Stan AF 2
LordPrabhzy Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Mariyam said: What if one openly and respectfully disagrees with your true definition of liberalism. Would that make the person disagreeing a liberal? I'm confused. I was not the one that made the original definition of Liberalism- it is a concept and ideology which has been twisted and manipulated by the left wing in recent times. raki05 and Gollum 2
Iconoclast Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 On 3/3/2020 at 7:12 AM, First class said: India fights back------------wrong Extremist hindus ( not the good ones ) fight back . Pretty much every Indian I know is against this. Indian Americans are mostly very liberal. Alam_dar, Laaloo and raki05 1 2
Alam_dar Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 10 hours ago, LordPrabhzy said: The true definition of liberalism is being open and respectful of other views.. however neo 'liberals' cannot tolerate another viewpoint- that is fascism! Problem is this that mostly religious right wings go directly against the "Basic Human Rights". This is red line of the liberals.
Alam_dar Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 8 hours ago, LordPrabhzy said: I was not the one that made the original definition of Liberalism- it is a concept and ideology which has been twisted and manipulated by the left wing in recent times. Liberalism came out of left wing .... or the left wing came out of Liberalism? My personal observation is this that neither left wing nor liberalism are driving forces behind each other, but it is "humanity" which is the driving force behind both liberalism/left wing.
Muloghonto Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 1 minute ago, Alam_dar said: Liberalism came out of left wing .... or the left wing came out of Liberalism? My personal observation is this that neither left wing nor liberalism are driving forces behind each other, but it is "humanity" which is the driving force behind both liberalism/left wing. There is no humanity in denying females are women to empower men in the west as liberals are doing now. Liberalism today is about totalitarian thought control like the commies.
Laaloo Posted March 4, 2020 Posted March 4, 2020 36 minutes ago, Iconoclast said: Pretty much every Indian I know is against this. Indian Americans are mostly very liberal. They are idiots because of the shoe were on the other foot, muslims would never support them. Gollum 1
EnterTheVoid Posted March 5, 2020 Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) 23 hours ago, Muloghonto said: Err sorry but I never denied it as discriminatory, I have always said that it is perfectly rational and justifiable. The only fruit loops here are the liberals, who cannot explain how on earth can a majoritarian religion holder from a said nation claim religious persecution, especially when that religion is either the national or official religion. Feel free to explain how a Catholic from the Vatican City can claim religious persecution as a refugee claim. This Mulololo - yahoo pretty much spoke for all the CAA lovers. The CAA is discriminatory and they know it, they just don't care. To his credit, this Mulolo - yahoo is the most honest of a lying bunch. And that's nothing to feel good about. Edited March 5, 2020 by EnterTheVoid
coffee_rules Posted March 5, 2020 Posted March 5, 2020 8 minutes ago, EnterTheVoid said: This Mulololo - yahoo pretty much spoke for all the CAA lovers. The CAA is discriminatory and they know it, they just don't care. To his credit, this Mulolo - yahoo is the most honest of a lying bunch. And that's nothing to feel good about. Read the rest of the post, khajoor and respond raki05 1
EnterTheVoid Posted March 5, 2020 Posted March 5, 2020 5 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: Read the rest of the post, khajoor and respond I did. Rohingya's and Ahmadis face persecution. Why should a present day Rohingya/Ahmadi in Pakistan/Bangladesh suffer for their entire existence just because their ancestors made the decision to migrate there 50 years ago? How does your humanity allow you to be apathetic to their suffering?
coffee_rules Posted March 5, 2020 Posted March 5, 2020 33 minutes ago, EnterTheVoid said: I did. Rohingya's and Ahmadis face persecution. Why should a present day Rohingya/Ahmadi in Pakistan/Bangladesh suffer for their entire existence just because their ancestors made the decision to migrate there 50 years ago? How does your humanity allow you to be apathetic to their suffering? Rohingyas are a security threat, they have already killed hundreds of Hindus and hid them in mass graves. If they were safe, why are 49 other Islamic countries not taking them? Ahmediyas can apply for asylum and become naturalized citizens, who told you India Is not allowing them. Laaloo, Gollum, LordPrabhzy and 3 others 6
Muloghonto Posted March 5, 2020 Posted March 5, 2020 2 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said: This Mulololo - yahoo pretty much spoke for all the CAA lovers. The CAA is discriminatory and they know it, they just don't care. To his credit, this Mulolo - yahoo is the most honest of a lying bunch. And that's nothing to feel good about. Feel free to answer the question asked. We are supposed to discriminate against majoritarian identity when claiming discrimination, idiot !!
Muloghonto Posted March 5, 2020 Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, EnterTheVoid said: I did. Rohingya's and Ahmadis face persecution. Why should a present day Rohingya/Ahmadi in Pakistan/Bangladesh suffer for their entire existence just because their ancestors made the decision to migrate there 50 years ago? How does your humanity allow you to be apathetic to their suffering? CAA does not recognize or seperate sects of a religion. Entire religions are mentioned as criteria to persecution, not its sects. It doesn’t mention Mahayana or Theravada, Catholics or Protestants either. Gollum and Stradlater 2
FischerTal Posted March 5, 2020 Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said: I did. Rohingya's and Ahmadis face persecution. Why should a present day Rohingya/Ahmadi in Pakistan/Bangladesh suffer for their entire existence just because their ancestors made the decision to migrate there 50 years ago? How does your humanity allow you to be apathetic to their suffering? Eh rohingyas and Ahmediyas can still come to India and seek refugee status you clown. CAA only fasttracks citizenship for persecuted minorities from Islamic republic of Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan. Edited March 5, 2020 by FischerTal Gollum, Stradlater, raki05 and 1 other 4
Recommended Posts