Jump to content

Ajinkya Rahane- the worst Indian batsman to have played 65 tests


Majestic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Our overseas specialist, this is the guy who averaged 50 overseas after the completion of first tour. 

 

He gets to bat at the easiest batting conditions and still doesn't score enough. The worst investment of all-time. 

 

I will let this thread do the talking as I guess a lot of us are equally frustrated on Rahane. If he has any shame, he must hit atleast two centuries in this series.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

From Aus series in 1998 and SA series in 2007, Ganguly averaged 37 in 74 tests and remained captain for long term.

 

With avg of 31 in India and 43 overseas. 7 100s

Posted
5 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

From Aus series in 1998 and SA series in 2007, Ganguly averaged 37 in 74 tests and remained captain for long term.

Rahane averages 37 minus minnows.:facepalm:

Posted
3 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

From Aus series in 1998 and SA series in 2007, Ganguly averaged 37 in 74 tests and remained captain for long term.

Ganguly had the added responsibility of captaincy and he opened in ODIs too apart from being a left hander. With rahane, he can't even  be adequate  in the lone discipline he is operating on.     

Posted
1 minute ago, rtmohanlal said:

Ganguly had the added responsibility of captaincy and he opened in ODIs too apart from being a left hander. With rahane, he can't even  be adequate  in the lone discipline he is operating on.     

 

But in tests he wasn't exactly better batsman than Rahane.

 

Came at similar position after ATG Indian batsmen.

 

Apart from 144 at Gaba, didn't have many 100s to remember.

Posted

Rahane has been living off that 1 hundred in lords in his entire career.

 

Has done nothing.

 

Even the other matches he has scored overseas the series result has been loss.

 

Mediocre at best.

 

If Rohit Sharma was given the same backing he would be on par with V Kohli in Test Cricket.

 

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

But in tests he wasn't exactly better batsman than Rahane.

 

Came at similar position after ATG Indian batsmen.

 

Apart from 144 at Gaba, didn't have many 100s to remember.

 

He did score a blistering hundred in headlngly 2002.

 

128

 

Most importantly India won Match and drew test series. Sachin and David scored hundreds on the same inning that match also.

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

But in tests he wasn't exactly better batsman than Rahane.

 

Came at similar position after ATG Indian batsmen.

 

Apart from 144 at Gaba, didn't have many 100s to remember.

he took upon himself a lot of captaincy pressure so that others can  play with out bothering much about those aspects. Similarly he was a lot better at developing  the team  .

If he was the current  captain Pujara and Rahane wouldn't have been playing by now. Also him being a left hander added lot more variety to the batting line up.

Posted
2 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said:

If he was the current  captain Pujara and Rahane wouldn't have been playing by now.

May or perhaps they'd have done better? Name one major batter developing under Kohli, the issue is him as far as I'm concerned.

Posted
2 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said:

he took upon himself a lot of captaincy pressure so that others can  play with out bothering much about those aspects. Similarly he was a lot better at developing  the team  .

If he was the current  captain Pujara and Rahane wouldn't have been playing by now. Also him being a left hander added lot more variety to the batting line up.

 

 

 

 

:dance:

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said:

he took upon himself a lot of captaincy pressure so that others can  play with out bothering much about those aspects. Similarly he was a lot better at developing  the team  .

If he was the current  captain Pujara and Rahane wouldn't have been playing by now. Also him being a left hander added lot more variety to the batting line up.

 

 

Thread is only about batting. 

 

Posted
49 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

How is he worse than Sourav Ganguly in tests?

Well the fact that ganguly was a  odi legend and had to play tons of odi matches along with test meant he had a more hectic schedule and had switch quickly to the other format  .

Also the added pressure of captaincy .

It's like those Cook vs sachin comparison in mid 2015, sachin had played an extra 350 odi matches over cook ,doesnt it mean anything ,cook had the similar luxury as rahane 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

 

 

 

 

:dance:

 

 

yeah ..... he gave an opinion like that  being a 3rd person...  but he wouldn't have  tolerated a non performer for long if he himself was the captain.He would have tried Pujara  a lot earlier and if that failed, would have kicked him out. but with this TM non performers can keep on playing in the team....

Posted
16 minutes ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

 

 

 

 

:dance:

 

 

Easy to speak as a third person without any research/fact dwelling, I am 100 pc sure Rahane would have been out of the team a long ago along with non performers like chahal ,shaw .

Gill ,Raul would have been settled in the team by now 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

 

Thread is only about batting. 

 

you were  saying that Rahane was  no lesser a batsman compared to Sourav.  Sourav averaged almost same despite having added pressures . And him being a left hander , right handed batsman at the other end crease too could benefit. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...