Serpico Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 (edited) People used to joke about Shane watson reviewing plumbest LBWs but our skipper has reviewed a cleaned bowled decision!! How much ego must one have to believe that somehow a clean bowled decision will be overturned? did he think the umpires, english players, rohit and crowd are all involved in a conspiracy to give him a duck? I wonder how the chat with rohit went before asking for a review. "t-the ball hit the stumps v-virat" "chup kar bc" Edited February 13, 2021 by Serpico saik, raki05, nevada and 1 other 4
sage Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 He is Indian WG Grace of course he has the ego to review a bowled Serpico 1
sage Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 The crowd has come to see Virat bat, not Moeen bowl! Cricspin 1
Austin 3:!6 Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 It was more due to embarassment than ego. After his failure in 1st test, he was looking to get a big score here and couldnt believe he can get out for a duck.Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Popular Post QuarantineTormentino Posted February 13, 2021 Popular Post Posted February 13, 2021 Nah worst review has to be this one sage, bowl_out, velu and 8 others 11
velu Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 what .. did rat review and lost the review ? Clarke, raki05 and Rightarmfast 2 1
raki05 Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 7 minutes ago, Serpico said: People used to joke about Shane watson reviewing plumbest LBWs but our skipper has reviewed a cleaned bowled decision!! How much ego must one have to believe that somehow a clean bowled decision will be overturned? did he think the umpires, english players, rohit and crowd are all involved in a conspiracy to give him a duck? I wonder how the chat with rohit went before asking for a review. "t-the ball hit the stumps v-virat" "chup kar bc" Even English commentators and players in dug out were laughing their ass off. Such a shameless man this bollywood Kohli is.
kubrickian Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 What rubbish. It was referred by umpires because there was doubt if it hit the stumps or not. India still has 3 reviews intact. nevada, kruiser, Under_Score and 2 others 5
R!TTER Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 3 minutes ago, velu said: what .. did rat review and lost the review Yeah no idea the * is this all about Clarke 1
RajBan Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 We need to get rid of this guy. His despicable attitude now outweighs any cricketing ability he brings to the table. Rightarmfast 1
sage Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 6 minutes ago, velu said: what .. did rat review and lost the review ? He intimidated umpires to review it themselves Rightarmfast, Under_Score, raki05 and 1 other 4
RajBan Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, kubrickian said: What rubbish. It was referred by umpires because there was doubt if it hit the stumps or not. India still has 3 reviews intact. The rubbish is umpires reviewed because Kohli acted like he can't be out and stood his ground. No other players would have shown that kind of abhorrent attitude in the first place. Umpires lacking any self respect simply gave in. raki05, BacktoCricaddict and Rightarmfast 3
Serpico Posted February 13, 2021 Author Posted February 13, 2021 5 minutes ago, kubrickian said: What rubbish. It was referred by umpires because there was doubt if it hit the stumps or not. India still has 3 reviews intact. I guess you only saw the scorecard? Kohli refused to leave and umpire had to go to third ump.. benefit of home umps saved us a review raki05 1
Number Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 I think he knew we won't lose review. Still it was so funny. Kohli has become a joker. raki05 1
Clarke Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 Seems a trend with some of our maharathis. The way we burnt reviews against Mendis', oh boy how can I be out, I'm a God/Superstar! raki05 1
kubrickian Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 3 minutes ago, Serpico said: I guess you only saw the scorecard? Kohli refused to leave and umpire had to go to third ump.. benefit of home umps saved us a review There was doubt if hit the stumps directly or maybe bounced off the wicket keeper's gloves and hit the stumps. Whenever there is doubt, umpires can refer the decision. In any case, India didnt lose any reviews. End of story.
Clarke Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 (edited) The story here for me was 'intent'. Rat gets carried away with that word. Get a feel of the wicket before your flowing cover drive, will ya! Edited February 13, 2021 by Clarke raki05 1
kubrickian Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 So many losers here who would rather see Indian players fail, so they can slander them some more because of their own jealousy and insecurity. BacktoCricaddict, GoldenSun and kruiser 3
Serpico Posted February 13, 2021 Author Posted February 13, 2021 1 minute ago, kubrickian said: There was doubt if hit the stumps directly or maybe bounced off the wicket keeper's gloves and hit the stumps. Whenever there is doubt, umpires can refer the decision. In any case, India didnt lose any reviews. End of story. there was no doubt at all, why will stumps move backwards if it rebounded from keeper's hands? Clarke, raki05 and velu 2 1
bahadur_billa Posted February 13, 2021 Posted February 13, 2021 4 minutes ago, Clarke said: Seems a trend with some of our maharathis. The way we burnt reviews against Mendis', oh boy how can I be out, I'm a God/Superstar! And after that we decided not to have DRS for 6-7 years sage and Clarke 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now