Why was H Pandya selected for WC ?

[neel roy]

9 minutes ago, sensible-indian said:

All of this makes too much sense.

 

So its rightly rejected by Indian management.

Yes unfortunately. Venkatesh iyer has gone back to india to play syed mushtaq ali. TM has sent him back

[ShoonyaSifar]

Both him and Bhuvi were quite clearly unfit in IPL phase 2. How they were still retained will always remain a mystery.

[sensible-indian]

1 hour ago, neel roy said:

Yes unfortunately. Venkatesh iyer has gone back to india to play syed mushtaq ali. TM has sent him back

We honestly don't deserve to win.

 

Phattu management lol.

 

We will keep crying about an AR while sending back the one who is actually good.

Edited October 25, 2021 by sensible-indian

[Lone Wolf]

25 minutes ago, sensible-indian said:

We honestly don't deserve to win.

 

Phattu management lol.

 

We will keep crying about an AR while sending back the one who is actually good.

Konsa All rounder?  He is playing as pure batsman...  In a country of 1.3 billion he is as good a Batsman as anyone in tge country?  What logic is that?  How is he better than Kishan or even Iyer as a pure batsman?  What are his FC stats as a pure batsman over these 2 guys? 

Edited October 25, 2021 by Lone Wolf

[sensible-indian]

24 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Konsa All rounder?  He is playing as pure batsman...  In a country of 1.3 billion he is as good a Batsman as anyone in tge country?  What logic is that?  How is he better than Kishan or even Iyer as a pure batsman?  What are his FC stats as a pure batsman over these 2 guys? 

I am talking about Venkatesh Iyer.

 

In form bat who can bowl 2 overs atleast.

 

You thought i am talking about Pandya?

[maniac]

He is selected as a pure batsman but bats at no.7 in a T20 game behind Jadeja.

selectors and every one that matter say he will bowl if needed, doesn’t bowl in warmups or anywhere else so when exactly will he bowl?

Pandya might be the greatest talent ever but what’s the point?

[Khota]

Because there are morons on this board who all they do is watch cricket and have no idea how the world has progressed. It is a shame Hardik was selected.

[sensible-indian]

4 minutes ago, maniac said:

He is selected as a pure batsman but bats at no.7 in a T20 game behind Jadeja.

selectors and every one that matter say he will bowl if needed, doesn’t bowl in warmups or anywhere else so when exactly will he bowl?

Pandya might be the greatest talent ever but what’s the point?

He was a youngster in 2016.

 

Is a youngster in 2021.

 

Will be a youngster in 2024.

[Ajju]

He is best Stylist player present in this team

[Lone Wolf]

19 minutes ago, sensible-indian said:

I am talking about Venkatesh Iyer.

 

In form bat who can bowl 2 overs atleast.

 

You thought i am talking about Pandya?

Hahah no man just a question to those who believe Pandya is playing as a imaginary All rounder in the side. 

[Rantzz]

It’s a joke he was selected. I’d rather select MSD for pure captaincy and I bet he smacks more than Pandya as batsman

[SK_IH]

There has been too much talk about things other than cricket in so far as Hardik is concerned & that's a clear indication the player has lost focus. 

[sensible-indian]

48 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Hahah no man just a question to those who believe Pandya is playing as a imaginary All rounder in the side. 

Haha all good buddy. :D

[maniac]

40 minutes ago, Rantzz said:

It’s a joke he was selected. I’d rather select MSD for pure captaincy and I bet he smacks more than Pandya as batsman

he was for the last 2-3 of his career anyway even though he was useless with everything else.

 

Enough of such reilu kattas with intangible and imaginary skills like “intent” “agresshion” “great brains” “DRS specialist” please.

 

Pick good players with good skills and record who are in good form. That’s the way to go.

[vvvslaxman]

He said his docs advised him not to bowll. Hope they advise him not to bat as well.

[maniac]

Just now, vvvslaxman said:

He said his docs advised him not to bowll. Hope they advise him not to bat as well.

His docs advised him? Who are his docs? Are they BCCI docs?

 

Also then he should have focused on his batting full time to be able to play at 4-5 and not 7. No one seems to have a confidence on him for that.

 

 

[zen]

5 hours ago, Austin 3:!6 said:

 

But come actual match, Jadeja is send at no.6 to hide the best no.6 batsman for India batting at 6 

 

That was to maintain L-R combination. If Kohli would have got out, SDP would have walked in.

 

Sending Jadeja in sucked up the momentum, so it was another example of  “formulaic” thinking by the TM.

 

[maniac]

4 minutes ago, zen said:

That was to maintain L-R combination. If Kohli would have got out, SDP would have walked in.

 

Sending Jadeja in sucked up the momentum, so it was another example of  “formulaic” thinking by the TM.

 

How much do you think we would have ended up with if that had happened?

 

serious question. Need a cricket acumen answer not a coulda woulda shoulda 

[Lord]

6 minutes ago, zen said:

That was to maintain L-R combination. If Kohli would have got out, SDP would have walked in.

 

Sending Jadeja in sucked up the momentum, so it was another example of  “formulaic” thinking by the TM.

 

 

our top 4 was all RHB. If TM is big on that,then Pant should have walked ahead of SKY and maybe Kishan would play too.

 

It didn't seem to be the reason.

[Austin 3:!6]

23 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

our top 4 was all RHB. If TM is big on that,then Pant should have walked ahead of SKY and maybe Kishan would play too.

 

It didn't seem to be the reason.

 

LOL exactly this.