Pakistan and Srilanka LOI bowling is more exciting than India’s: prove me wrong.

[raki05]

Lol other than Bumrah all bowlers are defensive they are not wkt takers. Basically our TM and jhola expert mindset are so rotten that they are selecting defensives  attack, whereas many other teams have selected  attacking bowler who can take wkts in any part of game.Our planning is, so and so trundlers should ball in pp , other trundler should ball in mo and Bumrah should save our @$$ in death over. What happened if some proactive team thrashed this bhuvi in pp, than Bhuvi become useless for entire match as other than pp he can't bowl anywhere else and he is complete moron in another 2 things which is batting and fielding. Same goes with other defensive trundlers. I mean how can you go in a tournament with such rotten mindset, that you are hoping to complete quota of your defensive trundlers as per planned strategy economically. You don't have  have anyone other than Bumrah whom you can bank on to get a wkt on crucial moment especially in low scoring games. Would these trundlers would still ball economically where Indian batting has failed and scored around 140-150 , you are not even taking in to account scenarios. Complete moronic.

[MultiB48]

21 hours ago, Adamant said:

The squad which won the 2007 world cup had 

 

Irfan Pathan - medium pacer

 

Rp Singh - another medium pacer, only deluded Indians will call him fast

 

Joginder Sharma - lol

 

Sreesanth - the only fast bowler but he got hit all around the park

 

Rp was at his peak in 2007 ,you don't know that then that's your problem.

[Jay]

13 minutes ago, MultiB48 said:

Rp was at his peak in 2007 ,you don't know that then that's your problem.

Adamant is the number 1 dumbass of this forum along with thatvother moron putrevus. He is as clueless aa they come. He is a closet parki. They are known to have a vacuous space between their ears. So... yea

[Jay]

4 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

PP- Bhuvi (3 overs) and rest wud be divided between Axar, hardik, bumrah, arsheep, Ashwin ( a lot will depend on matchups). Axar will give more pp value the jadeja

 

So captain has enough options to rotate in PP 

 

Middle overs- Bumrah - hardik, chahal, axar and Arsh/harshal 

 

Bhuvi will come in here in between complete his one over wherever they wanna stop runs 

 

Death overs- Bumrah- Arshdeep/Harshal and and chahal can be used in death, leg spinners are being used at death now days . Chahal took 14 wkts from 16-20 this yr in IPL 

 

Its a very good attack , since every phase is well covered and captain has enough options to play around 
With so many options captain can use Bumrah like how he wants , use him when pressure is most high ..............going after bumrah in high pressure is quite dangerous 

This is why stats don't mean everything. 

This is why conditions matter

This is why players cant be judge off ipl

This is why players should only be judged on skill pace and bounce or ability to move the ball. 

 

Chahal bhoobi who should really only be a 3rd bowler should not play. 

[vvvslaxman]

Going forward India has to set the expectations that spinners must be a decent batsman and fielder. Otherwise he has to be a shane warne level bowler.  Kumble/Harbhajan could all bat. Even Kuldeep can bat. This weasel Chahal can't bat to save his life.

[Ankit_sharma03]

9 hours ago, Jay said:

This is why stats don't mean everything. 

This is why conditions matter

This is why players cant be judge off ipl

This is why players should only be judged on skill pace and bounce or ability to move the ball. 

 

Chahal bhoobi who should really only be a 3rd bowler should not play. 

Stats are performances

Dellusions and hype dont mean much 

IPL is not the only judge but when international sample is not avl u go to domestic numbers . If you cant perform at domestic level then no one will back at international level 

pace, bounce, moving ball all wont matter if u cant put it in right slot ...................its all about deception and pace-bounce-moving ball is part of it but so are turning the ball, slower ones, yorkers, varying pace- length are 

 

If u have problem with XYZ give better options and prove it how they are better 

Edited September 14, 2022 by Ankit_sharma03

[maniac]

22 hours ago, Adamant said:

 

 

Sreesanth - the only fast bowler but he got hit all around the park

 

people don’t remember WT20 for 2 reasons either they are too young or they have erased it from their memory. Sreeshanth was very erratic but on his day a bonafide match winner.

 

 

[singhvivek141]

22 hours ago, Adamant said:

The squad which won the 2007 world cup had 

 

Irfan Pathan - medium pacer

 

Rp Singh - another medium pacer, only deluded Indians will call him fast

 

Joginder Sharma - lol

 

Sreesanth - the only fast bowler but he got hit all around the park

 

Irfan Pathan was handy with bat
RP Singh was a rhythm bowler, he has clocked 140's as well, but again his primary skill was swing which he got plenty in SA.
Sreesanth was the reason for our fight against Australia, got rid of Gilly at the start and later uprooted offstump of Matthew Hayden who was hitting sixes for fun. He also bowled well against SA Played a cameo inns against NZ as well (though we lost that)
Jogi was also handy with bat.

Except RP, everyone in that team can swing the bat and contribute at the end. We had batting till 10 (not that we needed due as our batting firepower was amazing).

[singhvivek141]

3 minutes ago, maniac said:

people don’t remember WT20 for 2 reasons either they are too young or they have erased it from their memory. Sreeshanth was very erratic but on his day a bonafide match winner.

 

 

True, this round the wicket delivery to Haydos is the criminally underrated. Brute of a wicket.

[Adorable Fan]

Excluding Bumrah.. it's better to watch paint dry than watching the other pretenders like muscles Bhuvi, Harshal, Chahal. If teams are smart enough just need to see off Bumrah overs rest all can be taken to cleaners.

[maniac]

5 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Irfan Pathan was handy with bat
RP Singh was a rhythm bowler, he has clocked 140's as well, but again his primary skill was swing which he got plenty in SA.
Sreesanth was the reason for our fight against Australia, got rid of Gilly at the start and later uprooted offstump of Matthew Hayden who was hitting sixes for fun. He also bowled well against SA Played a cameo inns against NZ as well (though we lost that)
Jogi was also handy with bat.

Except RP, everyone in that team can swing the bat and contribute at the end. We had batting till 10 (not that we needed due as our batting firepower was amazing).

even in final people remember him getting smacked by “better than Sehwag” Nazir but  he also bowled a maiden and got Tanvir out to a great delivery who was looking dangerous. Not to forget the iconic catch :)

[singhvivek141]

14 minutes ago, maniac said:

even in final people remember him getting smacked by “better than Sehwag” Nazir but  he also bowled a maiden and got Tanvir out to a great delivery who was looking dangerous. Not to forget the iconic catch :)

Exactly, Sree was mercurial, but someone who always gave 100% whenever he wore Indian jersey.
Had that intensity and zing in his runup which is rare in Indian bowlers.

Edited September 14, 2022 by singhvivek141

[Adamant]

1 hour ago, maniac said:

people don’t remember WT20 for 2 reasons either they are too young or they have erased it from their memory. Sreeshanth was very erratic but on his day a bonafide match winner.

 

 

On his day Bhuvi is also a match-winner. 

Doesn't matter if he js as fast as Sreesanth or not. 

 

Anyone who takes Sreesanth over Bhuvi in any form of the game is totally clueless. 

[Strangering]

Best phaast bowlers bowl 10 consecutive balls wide of off stump and say prayers. 

[raki05]

42 minutes ago, Adamant said:

On his day Bhuvi is also a match-winner. 

Doesn't matter if he js as fast as Sreesanth or not. 

 

Anyone who takes Sreesanth over Bhuvi in any form of the game is totally clueless. 

Any day sreesanth over this malnourished trundler. Had he been part of 2007 wt20 team. India won ld have lost all the ko. Forget Sreeshanth , he is worst than Joginder who saved 11 in last over, this Malnourished trundler would have given 4-5 wide before one getting slapped over long on.

[Mesky99]

2 hours ago, maniac said:

even in final people remember him getting smacked by “better than Sehwag” Nazir but  he also bowled a maiden and got Tanvir out to a great delivery who was looking dangerous. Not to forget the iconic catch :)

Bowled two dot balls when scores were level against Pak in the first game, had three good games in that tournament.

[the don]

Liam livingstone had rated naseem shah as the toughest bowler he had faced in his career even before he made his white ball debut. He was always a different level just too raw.

[cricketfan28]

Not sure about Lanka but Pak as always is exciting.

[Jay]

4 hours ago, the don said:

Liam livingstone had rated naseem shah as the toughest bowler he had faced in his career even before he made his white ball debut. He was always a different level just too raw.

Naseem shahe is **** lol. **** test bowler. **** odi bowler. Ok t20 phasst bowler. But even that we shall see shortly in australai. 

[Jay]

Ahahahhaha dome idiot said bhuooobi over sreesanth in loi. Laughable mate.