sage Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 wtf was that? and the umpire smiling? collusion? raki05 1 Link to comment
gattaca Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 It was close to the leg Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 yes.he knows bang bros were being a dick. raki05 and Mariyam 2 Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 Nash, raki05, Laaloo and 5 others 8 Link to comment
Number Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 As long as it is okay for bowler to bowl wides to stop batter from reaching milestone. Link to comment
Nonbeliever Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 Umpire is not a mind reader to declare the delivery was a intentional wide. He was absolutely wrong on this. As long as batsman can continuously cancel confirmed singles to score a century mocking the opponents and game, bowler has a right to even bowling a intentional wide. Link to comment
bowl_out Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 For the record, this was called wide Norman, Austin 3:!6, Lord and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment
Popular Post Lord Posted October 19, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted October 19, 2023 19 minutes ago, cowboysfan said: Guy calculated his career is more important than one wide Mariyam, bowl_out, raki05 and 10 others 13 Link to comment
rageaddict Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 Deliberate wides shouldnt be given in such situations, good decision. Mariyam 1 Link to comment
Sindragosa Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 I'm sure the PCB will file a complaint. Frustrated, putrevus, Swag and 1 other 4 Link to comment
NameGoesHere Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 (edited) The title assumes that 1. The Umpire did not call a wide. This is a fact. 2. The “not a wide call” benefitted the batsman. This may or may not have been the case, as in the end even if it had been called it would not have mattered; Kohli hit a six. 3. The Umpire did not call the wide in order to benefit the batsman. This assumption is unproven as we cannot know what the Umpire was thinking. Perhaps his underarms were stinking and he didn’t want to give them air? However in the nation of Pakistan this is regarded as entirely conclusive evidence of a conspiracy against that great state. Expect PCB to issue a strong statement against the dushman mulk. Edited October 19, 2023 by NameGoesHere Mariyam, Need4Speed and Sindragosa 1 1 1 Link to comment
Austin 3:!6 Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 ICC helping Kohli...just like FIFA helped Messi in last world cup Frustrated 1 Link to comment
Austin 3:!6 Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 32 minutes ago, Sindragosa said: I'm sure the PCB will file a complaint. Pak fans are already crying abt it in social media Link to comment
R!TTER Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 54 minutes ago, bowl_out said: For the record, this was called wide So? Wide & no ball(for height) depends solely on umpire's discretion. Link to comment
MediumPacer Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 13 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Pak fans are already crying abt it in social media Indians are also upset Link to comment
Nash Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 It is not ok. but it doesn’t change anything. India would have win and kohli would have 100. nikrulz 1 Link to comment
nikrulz Posted October 19, 2023 Share Posted October 19, 2023 4 minutes ago, Nash said: It is not ok. but it doesn’t change anything. India would have win and kohli would have 100. This Wouldn't have mattered anyway. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now