SandeepMotta Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 12 hours ago, Nikhil_cric said: Srinath had everything needed to be a quality fast bowler. There was no concept of workload management or anything back in the day and he was bowled into the ground without any support Right. He was bowled to the ground in the 90s and if their was anything that srinath actually lacked it was the fast bowler aggression even though he was rapid. express bowling, Vijy and Nikhil_cric 3 Link to comment
singhvivek141 Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 14 minutes ago, rageaddict said: Srinath was phasst but look at his attitude , zero aggression even after getting better off the batsman.. It's ok. Not every person is aggressive or outspoken. Shami don't speak much, neither does Bumrah...but they are feared by the opposition. In comparison Siraj is more verbal, but I don't think he has that fear factor which the former 2 carries. Srinath struggled because his partners were not good enough, Prasad was just decent, so was Prabhakar..both were as good as Bhuvi. Srinath was the only one who was more than decent...maybe at Shami's level, but he had mediocre support. express bowling 1 Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 At the post-match ceremony, POTM is all fine, but, He said he wants to play for India. Vijy and express bowling 2 Link to comment
putrevus Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 (edited) 26 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said: It's ok. Not every person is aggressive or outspoken. Shami don't speak much, neither does Bumrah...but they are feared by the opposition. In comparison Siraj is more verbal, but I don't think he has that fear factor which the former 2 carries. Srinath struggled because his partners were not good enough, Prasad was just decent, so was Prabhakar..both were as good as Bhuvi. Srinath was the only one who was more than decent...maybe at Shami's level, but he had mediocre support. Srinath was decent at his best,, why is this need to prove that he was great. He hit Pringle and couple of others in face and he bowled fast in some spells .Does it make him great.At no point in his career he was great. Edited April 2 by putrevus Link to comment
cricketfan28 Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 Hope he become the Mayank yadav, not a big fan of holding always looked he has something against us. nevada 1 Link to comment
cric_fan Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 Wow what a find. Serious pace on show express bowling, nevada and Vijy 3 Link to comment
Vijy Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said: I agree with Lee. I think Mayank at his peak can exceed 160 Link to comment
Strangering Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 He's only 21. If he remains fit, he will get stronger and faster. Just keep the "pace isn't important" coaches away from him. First class, raki05 and express bowling 3 Link to comment
Vijy Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 2 hours ago, Strangering said: He's only 21. If he remains fit, he will get stronger and faster. Just keep the "pace isn't important" coaches away from him. once he gets into nat'l team, only those trundler-lover coaches exist. express bowling 1 Link to comment
First class Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 No reason he can't be picked for the Indian squad for the WC, he is ready to challenge the big boys at the biggest stage. Vijy and express bowling 2 Link to comment
Vijy Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 1 hour ago, First class said: No reason he can't be picked for the Indian squad for the WC, he is ready to challenge the big boys at the biggest stage. worry would be that even if sir aggy (agarkar) selects him, the mediocre duo of dravidiot (dravid) and mamba (mhambrey) may not actually give him game time. express bowling and raki05 2 Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 10 hours ago, putrevus said: Srinath was decent at his best,, why is this need to prove that he was great. He hit Pringle and couple of others in face and he bowled fast in some spells .Does it make him great.At no point in his career he was great. You should live through the experience before you read scorecards and statsguru. He was the first real pace bowler of India in international stds, ATG in pace for India given the real few. Played second fiddle till 94, peaked in 96/97 and then dragged along with injuries till 2003. He had to operate mostly singly, maybe with another good bowler he could have had the stats worthy of other greats for scorecard readers. He achieved less than Zaheer Khan but was a more natural pace bowler like Mayank is now at the same age. The point is about similarities between Mayank and him. Lean, skinny and natural. express bowling and raki05 1 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 6 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: You should live through the experience before you read scorecards and statsguru. He was the first real pace bowler of India in international stds, ATG in pace for India given the real few. Played second fiddle till 94, peaked in 96/97 and then dragged along with injuries till 2003. He had to operate mostly singly, maybe with another good bowler he could have had the stats worthy of other greats for scorecard readers. He achieved less than Zaheer Khan but was a more natural pace bowler like Mayank is now at the same age. The point is about similarities between Mayank and him. Lean, skinny and natural. I agree with your overall sentiment strongly. However, a couple of points Mayank isn't skinny at all. He is lean but looks strong. And Zaheer did not achieve more than Srinath in tests. Srinath had an average of 30.x while Zaheer averaged 32.9. Another aspect regarding Srinath is that Indian captains of that era did not know how to set fields for a real quick with bounce. Srinath brought the ball in with bounce. Lots of catches lobbed up at short leg but no fielders were kept there. If only this was done Srinath might have averaged 28. And slips were not kept deep enough for his super carry. Link to comment
Muloghonto Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 People forget one thing about Holding - he was an early contender for Jamaican nationals for 400m. Anyone who knows anything of T&F should know what that means. And this is why Holding had such an easy action, relatively injury-free career and above all, stamina to bowl 93-95mph all day for 20 overs in a day. For this chap to be a Holding, he has to demonstrate he can bowl 15-20 overs a day and not drop below 90mph- a nearly impossible ask with today's level of fitness. He is a good find, but lets wait and see if he is a Shoaib Akhtar ( all pace, zero stamina) or a Holding ( Pace and stamina). Link to comment
rkt.india Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 Srinath's bowling against England in 1996 was express pace. express bowling and raki05 1 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 raki05, Rightarmfast and express bowling 2 1 Link to comment
Number Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 What a spell yesterday. Almost bullied everyone with the pace and bounce he generated from unexpected lengths. BCCI please look after him. Treat him like you treat Bumrah. express bowling 1 Link to comment
Nikhil_cric Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 That action only allowed him to get the ball to cut back in. If he had a release that was not coming from 11 o clock and more from 1 o clock and closer to the stumps , he would have been a better Test bowler. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now