Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Chetan Bhagat argues that India should avoid being consumed by its obsession with Pakistan, particularly after recent conflicts like Op Sindoor. He compares India's situation to Mark Zuckerberg settling lawsuits early in Facebook’s journey—not because he was wrong, but to focus on long-term success. Similarly, Bhagat suggests that India, now an emerging global economic power, should prioritize growth, stability, and global investment over emotional, reactionary wars with Pakistan.

 

He cautions that escalating conflict only benefits Pakistan by giving it international attention, while it distracts India from its development goals. Bhagat warns that war would bring economic damage, cost lives, and prove nothing—beating a failed state isn't a meaningful benchmark.

 

Instead, India should aim for a stable status quo, respect the Line of Control, and focus on becoming a rich, strong nation. In the long term, this success could attract regions like PoK to join India voluntarily. The smart strategy, he concludes, is disengagement, not escalation—because real power comes from prosperity, not war.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Tillu said:

Instead, India should aim for a stable status quo, respect the Line of Control, and focus on becoming a rich, strong nation. In the long term, this success could attract regions like PoK to join India voluntarily. The smart strategy, he concludes, is disengagement, not escalation—because real power comes from prosperity, not war.

 

He is undermining Modi's position on J&K. We should mind the international border not the LoC. We should take steps to reclaim lost territories not just sit pretty at the LoC. Of course we should go through diplomatic channels first then military action later. PoK will NOT join India voluntarily. Wake up! They have to be annexed when the time is right.

Posted
8 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Why does India have so many varieties? Jaguars, MIG, Tejas, sukhois, Mirage, now  Rafale.

 

Maintenance, parts, of all such varieties is a nightmare 

 

MIG, Sukhois are Russian

Mirage & Rafale are French

Jaguars are French-British

 

I think except Rafale...we have the capability to produce spare parts for all others. Even Sukhoi-30 as well.

 

Tejas is our homegrown...so for that supply will never be an issue.

Posted
3 hours ago, Tillu said:

Chetan Bhagat argues that India should avoid being consumed by its obsession with Pakistan, particularly after recent conflicts like Op Sindoor. He compares India's situation to Mark Zuckerberg settling lawsuits early in Facebook’s journey—not because he was wrong, but to focus on long-term success. Similarly, Bhagat suggests that India, now an emerging global economic power, should prioritize growth, stability, and global investment over emotional, reactionary wars with Pakistan.

 

He cautions that escalating conflict only benefits Pakistan by giving it international attention, while it distracts India from its development goals. Bhagat warns that war would bring economic damage, cost lives, and prove nothing—beating a failed state isn't a meaningful benchmark.

 

Instead, India should aim for a stable status quo, respect the Line of Control, and focus on becoming a rich, strong nation. In the long term, this success could attract regions like PoK to join India voluntarily. The smart strategy, he concludes, is disengagement, not escalation—because real power comes from prosperity, not war.

 

 

He is an idiot. If you can't protect Bharat and its citizens from barbarians across the LoC who keep coming in attacking our innocent people - then we have failed miserably as a country.

 

The sooner we can send Pak to its grave, the faster and more robust will be India's growth.

 

We can not have 2 major hostile adversaries to both our flanks. One has to go. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Tillu said:

Chetan Bhagat argues that India should avoid being consumed by its obsession with Pakistan, particularly after recent conflicts like Op Sindoor. He compares India's situation to Mark Zuckerberg settling lawsuits early in Facebook’s journey—not because he was wrong, but to focus on long-term success. Similarly, Bhagat suggests that India, now an emerging global economic power, should prioritize growth, stability, and global investment over emotional, reactionary wars with Pakistan.

 

He cautions that escalating conflict only benefits Pakistan by giving it international attention, while it distracts India from its development goals. Bhagat warns that war would bring economic damage, cost lives, and prove nothing—beating a failed state isn't a meaningful benchmark.

 

Instead, India should aim for a stable status quo, respect the Line of Control, and focus on becoming a rich, strong nation. In the long term, this success could attract regions like PoK to join India voluntarily. The smart strategy, he concludes, is disengagement, not escalation—because real power comes from prosperity, not war.

Noone takes a nation seriously let alone considering it a emerging global power if it cries like a pussy when it's citizens get continuously killed

Seldomly you need to flex your muscle,

Indian weapons are anyway getting all the PR they wanted in all these years

Posted
7 hours ago, Tillu said:

Chetan Bhagat argues that India should avoid being consumed by its obsession with Pakistan, particularly after recent conflicts like Op Sindoor. He compares India's situation to Mark Zuckerberg settling lawsuits early in Facebook’s journey—not because he was wrong, but to focus on long-term success. Similarly, Bhagat suggests that India, now an emerging global economic power, should prioritize growth, stability, and global investment over emotional, reactionary wars with Pakistan.

 

He cautions that escalating conflict only benefits Pakistan by giving it international attention, while it distracts India from its development goals. Bhagat warns that war would bring economic damage, cost lives, and prove nothing—beating a failed state isn't a meaningful benchmark.

 

Instead, India should aim for a stable status quo, respect the Line of Control, and focus on becoming a rich, strong nation. In the long term, this success could attract regions like PoK to join India voluntarily. The smart strategy, he concludes, is disengagement, not escalation—because real power comes from prosperity, not war.

 

Only makes sense in an ideal situation. You need to be harsh sometimes to set a deterrence, as long as it's a measured response.

Posted
7 hours ago, Tillu said:

Chetan Bhagat argues that India should avoid being consumed by its obsession with Pakistan, particularly after recent conflicts like Op Sindoor. He compares India's situation to Mark Zuckerberg settling lawsuits early in Facebook’s journey—not because he was wrong, but to focus on long-term success. Similarly, Bhagat suggests that India, now an emerging global economic power, should prioritize growth, stability, and global investment over emotional, reactionary wars with Pakistan.

 

He cautions that escalating conflict only benefits Pakistan by giving it international attention, while it distracts India from its development goals. Bhagat warns that war would bring economic damage, cost lives, and prove nothing—beating a failed state isn't a meaningful benchmark.

 

Instead, India should aim for a stable status quo, respect the Line of Control, and focus on becoming a rich, strong nation. In the long term, this success could attract regions like PoK to join India voluntarily. The smart strategy, he concludes, is disengagement, not escalation—because real power comes from prosperity, not war.

 

If Chetan Bhagat suggests something, it would be prudent to do the opposite. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Tillu said:

Chetan Bhagat argues that India should avoid being consumed by its obsession with Pakistan, particularly after recent conflicts like Op Sindoor. He compares India's situation to Mark Zuckerberg settling lawsuits early in Facebook’s journey—not because he was wrong, but to focus on long-term success. Similarly, Bhagat suggests that India, now an emerging global economic power, should prioritize growth, stability, and global investment over emotional, reactionary wars with Pakistan.

 

He cautions that escalating conflict only benefits Pakistan by giving it international attention, while it distracts India from its development goals. Bhagat warns that war would bring economic damage, cost lives, and prove nothing—beating a failed state isn't a meaningful benchmark.

 

Instead, India should aim for a stable status quo, respect the Line of Control, and focus on becoming a rich, strong nation. In the long term, this success could attract regions like PoK to join India voluntarily. The smart strategy, he concludes, is disengagement, not escalation—because real power comes from prosperity, not war.

The uber chutiya does not have the balls to fight a war and stomach to accept the loss.

 

 

Posted
On 5/20/2025 at 9:01 AM, Lord said:

The asshole got away :mad:

 

This Jyoti woman is pakka complicit. Too many 'coincidences'. 

So manuy such videos are cropping up. She is pretty complicit, they will eventually figure it out. This seems  Sallie  a script for a biopic from the Mahesh Bhatt camp directed by Mohit Suri.

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

So manuy such videos are cropping up. She is pretty complicit, they will eventually figure it out. This seems  Sallie  a script for a biopic from the Mahesh Bhatt camp directed by Mohit Suri.

 

 

 

She's a typical bimbo who simps over Pak guys.

 

Unfortunately, we have a considerable number of such specimen in our large diverse nation.

×
×
  • Create New...