Jump to content

Curious case of Mohali: selection conundrum?


_ramkumar

Team Selection  

59 members have voted

  1. 1. 3 spinners or 3 pacers?

  2. 2. All rounders other than ashwin?

    • Jayant & Jaddu
    • Jayant & Hardik
    • Hardik & Jaddu
    • Bhuvi & Jayant
    • Bhuvi & Jaddu
  3. 3. Has umesh done enough to retain his spot?



Recommended Posts

Posted

Good post Ramkumar.

Yes, it is early in the season and Mohalinmight not offer as muc assistance for pace bowlers as it would in January or Feb. Just my gut feeling.

 

I would go with 2-3 combo like Vizag test. 

 

In fact, play the same team. 

Posted
1 minute ago, _ramkumar said:

I am from Tamil Nadu. Currently an engineering student at NIT Jalandhar.

 

 check that thread out and you can share how you were able to locate us etc

Posted
5 minutes ago, Malcolm Merlyn said:

I feel the pitch will be like the one we got for last SA test.

But if the pitch is pacer friendly we can experiment with hardik as the third pacer, if its like the last SA test pitch  hardik won't get a chance this series.

Posted

Remove Jaddu. Get Bhuvi in..

Go with three pacers (Shami, Bhuvi, Umesh) and 2 spinners... 

 

Replacing Umesh with Pandya is an option they can consider, given that the third pacer will be under-used.. Pandya can add some more strength to the lower order batting.

 

Vijay 

KL

Pujara

Kohli

Rahane

Ashwin

Saha

Jayant

Pandya / Umesh

Bhuvi

Shami

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, bowl_out said:

Remove Jaddu. Get Bhuvi in..

Go with three pacers (Shami, Bhuvi, Umesh) and 2 spinners... 

 

Replacing Umesh with Pandya is an option they can consider, given that the third pacer will be under-used.. Pandya can add some more strength to the lower order batting.

 

Vijay 

KL

Pujara

Kohli

Rahane

Ashwin

Saha

Jayant

Pandya / Umesh

Bhuvi

Shami

Don't you think two offies make the spin attack a bit too one-dimensional?

Edited by jalebi_bhai
Posted (edited)

1)  Test match pitches are not necessarily similar to domestic match pitches in the same venue.  We are seeing this often in India too.

 

2)  Mohali has helped spinners more than seamers in the last 2 test matches. Here is a complete list of test matches played in Mohali.  It has been a ground which has favoured the Indian team mostly, after the debut match in 1994.  We have won 6, lost 1 and drawn 5 matches there.

 

 

Match result list
Winner Result Margin   Match Start DateAscending  
West Indies won 243 runs   India v West Indies 10 Dec 1994 Test # 1278
  draw -   India v Sri Lanka 19 Nov 1997 Test # 1385
  draw -   India v New Zealand 10 Oct 1999 Test # 1462
India won 10 wickets   India v England 3 Dec 2001 Test # 1574
  draw -   India v New Zealand 16 Oct 2003 Test # 1662
  draw -   India v Pakistan 8 Mar 2005 Test # 1738
India won 9 wickets   India v England 9 Mar 2006 Test # 1788
India won 320 runs   India v Australia 17 Oct 2008 Test # 1889
  draw -   India v England 19 Dec 2008 Test # 1901
India won 1 wickets   India v Australia 1 Oct 2010 Test # 1972
India won 6 wickets   India v Australia 14 Mar 2013 Test # 2081
India won 108 runs   India v South Africa 5 Nov 2015 Test # 2186

 

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/ground/57991.html?class=1;template=results;type=aggregate;view=results

 

3)  I will want a clear idea abouut the pitch before choosing my 11.

 

4) If it is a standard Indian pitch,  like last time we played in Mohali, then we should play 3 spinners and 2 seamers.   The rest of the team would be same as last match ...only choice is between Umesh and Bhuvi and I am undecided on this issue as of today.

 

5)  If it is a seamer friendly track...which I don't expect..then i will play 3 seamers and 2 spinners.

 

Bowlers would be Shami, Bhuvi. Pandya, Ashwin and  Jadeja.  ....Pandya playing as the 5th bowler / batting all-rounder.

Edited by express bowling
Posted

4 bowlers pick themselves irrespective of the pitch: 2 spinners and 2 pacers. So my two cents on these 4 first choice bowlers are:

1st Spinner: Ashwin

2nd Spinner: Jadeja. There could be an argument for JY given his performance in last test. However, Jadeja has proven himself over time and we need to see JY prove himself over Jadeja in at least 2-3 matches before being the automatic second spinner. Also, Butler and Woakes (2 right-handers) are likely to replace Duckett and Broad (2 left-handers) thus making a left-arm spinner more useful than an off-spinner given that you have Ashwin in the team as well.

1st Seamer: Shami

2nd Seamer: Bhuvi. Yes, Yadav produced that Bairstow wicket but mostly, he lacked control and provided a release ball to the batsman just when pressure was building up. Also, in the 3 matches Bhuvi has played in 2016, his stats are extra-ordinary even if you consider that pitches were helpful. 3 matches, 12 wickets at an average of 11.25, economy rate of 1.96 and strike rate of 34. The perceived notion that Umesh's pace and reverse swing has cause more trouble than Bhuvi's control and swing needs to be put to test. Can you imagine South Africa not playing Philander on slightly less helpful conditions for someone more pacy?

 

For the Fifth bowler choice, two scenarios arise:

Spin-friendly wicket: Choice should be Jayant Yadav. Don't think we need to debate this much.

Pace-friendly wicket: Here, it gets a bit tricky. At this stage, Yadav is definitely a wiser choice as a bowler than an unknown entity like Pandya. But the problem with playing Umesh is that the batting order from No.7 down looks something like this:

 

Saha (given his current form)

Jadeja (can never be assured of Jaddu the batsman)

Bhuvi (hasn't played an innings of note after the 2014 England tour where he scored 3 fifties)

Umesh

Shami

 

Looks like a very long tail and India may not be able to add more runs after being 5 wickets down. This will probably clinch it for Pandya. But it will not be an easy decision for Kumble and Kohli.

 

So, it seems apart from the home team advantage, team-selection will also be easier and more straight-forward if it is a turner!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...