Virat Kohli OUT OR NOTOUT?

[Rasgulla]

[kohli]

Not out

Edited December 16, 2018 by kohli

[zep1706]

Everything depends on the on field call. Usually the 3rd umpire stays with it. The soft signal was out, so that sealed his fate 

[SK_IH]

Was out , move on

[Adi BB]

Out ,no need to make a issue out of it.

I have seen plenty of such catches given out nowadays,they are constant in giving these catches out 

[test fan]

Ghanta BC out Ni that clear show hora tha 

[Vilander]

8 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

Was out , move on

[Vilander]

You dont catch a ball cleanly without fingers below it..lol cheats Aussies..expect pant to score a quickfire 100 here on. 

[Pollack]

16 minutes ago, zep1706 said:

Everything depends on the on field call. Usually the 3rd umpire stays with it. The soft signal was out, so that sealed his fate 

If there is clear evidence to prove otherwise, then the decision is overturned, no?  Here I think footage was clear enough to overturn the soft signal.

[jf1gp_1]

17 minutes ago, zep1706 said:

Everything depends on the on field call. Usually the 3rd umpire stays with it. The soft signal was out, so that sealed his fate 

exactly, if onfield call was not out he would have stayed on. 

[Vilander]

Just now, Pollack said:

If there is clear evidence to prove otherwise, then the decision is overturned, no?  Here I think footage was clear enough to overturn the soft signal.

Thats cheatscomb showed his hand the ball wedged between his fingers..how can a ball be cleanly caught so low wedged between hos fingers like that lol..it was clearly not out.

[Rightarmfast]

Clearly not out. But you win some, you lose some.

[Turning_track]

Imo it seems not out.

[Vilander]

Just now, Rightarmfast said:

Clearly not out. But you win some, you lose some.

Will be fun if pant goes ballistic now..hehe all the cheating to naught for convicts.

[Jimmy Cliff]

11 minutes ago, Vilander said:

Wow. And these guys were whining about Rahul's catch.

[Vilander]

Just now, Jimmy Cliff said:

Wow. And these guys were whining about Rahul's catch.

Utter disgrace man..cheats 

[nevada]

 

11 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said:

exactly, if onfield call was not out he would have stayed on. 

If that is the case, then what's the point of doing a review? 

[Cricketics]

19 minutes ago, Vilander said:

You dont catch a ball cleanly without fingers below it..lol cheats Aussies..expect pant to score a quickfire 100 here on. 

Dude come on calm down. Its umpire who called it out. You can’t blame the Aussie team for that. Fielder never knows that kind if such cat h was out or not as action in real time happens very quick. Blame the umpires and show less hatred towards the oppositon here. They had nothing to do with the decision. 

[Aiden]

Looks out

[goose]

it was out the soft signal is always out it seems