Jump to content

Should India Play match vs Pak in Champions Trophy?


Asim

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

What a silly comment that rofl. If government had control then they would stop India from playing?

Crazy thought. That means government is crazy to let Indian team hurt by forfeiting the game and points in the tournament.

 

govt does not decide who we play where but govt decide who invite, Visa, etc. So we can play them outside in a neutral venue. Even now BCCI is ready to play Pak at home but govt does not agree and I dont agree to boycott Pak games in a multinational tournament as it will hurt only us.

Posted
44 minutes ago, sarchasm said:

India must NOT play that islamofascist country anywhere, bilateral or multilateral. But especially not bilateral as it directly contributes to their economy. Afghanistan has just shown us the way.

That's a little funny my brother. Indian govt is doing trade with Pakistan with no hesitation. You think that doesnt add to their economy? :) Be real!

Posted
43 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

govt does not decide who we play where but govt decide who invite, Visa, etc. So we can play them outside in a neutral venue. Even now BCCI is ready to play Pak at home but govt does not agree and I dont agree to boycott Pak games in a multinational tournament as it will hurt only us.

Yes, totally different from what we were talking. I was replying to Beetle and others who want to boycott every pak game barring wc tournaments.

 

 

Posted

We hear 365*24*7 borders, Pakistan,Terrorism, dushman, war, ban, Boycott blah blah...

 

and suddenly whole of india puts all of above factors on 'pause' and gets ready for Pak vs Ind; one of the "most exciting" game...

 

all the logics we get from ind are i. we will not play Only in bilateral bcz to damage Pak $$ ii. we will play in ICC bcz we can't give Pak 2 points... so the fact is Value of ALL of Above factors which u make 24*7 speeches about < 2 points of ICC

 

we don't get this conditional and situational "ghairat"...

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Asim said:

We hear 365*24*7 borders, Pakistan,Terrorism, dushman, war, ban, Boycott blah blah...

 

and suddenly whole of india puts all of above factors on 'pause' and gets ready for Pak vs Ind; one of the "most exciting" game...

 

all the logics we get from ind are i. we will not play Only in bilateral bcz to damage Pak $$ ii. we will play in ICC bcz we can't give Pak 2 points... so the fact is Value of ALL of Above factors which u make 24*7 speeches about < 2 points of ICC

 

we don't get this conditional and situational "ghairat"...

abey hamari marzi, jab hamara mann karega khelenge, jab nahi karega to nahi khelenge, we make the rules because we rule cricket, we like to show your team its aukaat in ICC events and we also like to hurt you financially by not playing in bilaterals, we don't need to justify our stance to anyone, especially not to pakistan

Edited by beetle
Posted
49 minutes ago, Asim said:

We hear 365*24*7 borders, Pakistan,Terrorism, dushman, war, ban, Boycott blah blah...

 

and suddenly whole of india puts all of above factors on 'pause' and gets ready for Pak vs Ind; one of the "most exciting" game...

 

all the logics we get from ind are i. we will not play Only in bilateral bcz to damage Pak $$ ii. we will play in ICC bcz we can't give Pak 2 points... so the fact is Value of ALL of Above factors which u make 24*7 speeches about < 2 points of ICC

 

we don't get this conditional and situational "ghairat"...

Why is Pakistan playing India in ICC events then? They should just back out since India don't play with them in bilaterals. Anyways India is getting the free points in ICC events from Pakistan, so why bother playing?

Posted (edited)

The logic is simple really. Indian govt.(or public in general) doesnt want India to play Pakistan in a bilateral series because Pakistan has sheltered and sponsored terrorists against India and have shown no interest in clamping down on them. Having a cricket series will put more money into Pakistan's economy which will go into terrorists pockets to fund more attacks against us. 

 

We are not greatly excited about the match against Pakistan unlike Pakistan fans. We are excited about the tournament. Its the bloody ICC which puts us in the same group, so they can make more money out of this encounter. As for the reason why we should play Pak in ICC tournaments, World Cup and Champions Trophy are quite important and come once every 4 years. So playing Pak is like a bitter pill that's needed to achieve the overall objective - to win the tournament. Pulling out from such events is not in our best interests.

Edited by NareshK
Posted
5 minutes ago, express bowling said:

The whole purpose of this exercise, of not playing bilateral series against Pakistan, is to put pressure on Pakistan in a peaceful way, for promoting terrorism against India.

 

Not playing them in multilateral tournaments does not serve this purpose. Infact,  it works the other way.

 

Why would we take a course of action that would be diametrically opposite to our objective  ?

 

I don't even see the debate here !

Although I disagree with you, but I like your perspective.

Posted

Get ready on June 4

We India will beat Feebal Pakistan in front of thousand people on coming Sunday, today is Thursday

Your Ashraf will be super Flop vs Indian jadoo

Posted (edited)

India shouldnt do anything that benefits Pakistan. In bilaterals they get money so NO.

In ICC they will get free points (Manohar is allready giving freebies) So knock them out early

Edited by mishra
Posted
2 hours ago, express bowling said:

The whole purpose of this exercise, of not playing bilateral series against Pakistan, is to put pressure on Pakistan in a peaceful way, for promoting terrorism against India.

 

Not playing them in multilateral tournaments does not serve this purpose. Infact,  it works the other way.

 

Why would we take a course of action that would be diametrically opposite to our objective  ?

 

I don't even see the debate here !

Exactly. India is trying its best on various channels so that cricket can resume between the two nations

Posted
7 hours ago, Rightarmfast said:

While I have my own issues with the Pakistanis about the bowling paces and about tampering issues, I absolutely stand by what Bhajji, Azhar and Sohail suggested. I am pleasantly surprised with Bhajji taking such a strong and righteous stance and also validating it by quoting relevant examples. 

One must not forget that even if the 2 countries are fighting, the general public is not our enemy. Cricket is a game, let us not co-relate it with war. 

One needs to be objective and rise above the fake feelings of nationalism and stuff which our corrupt politicians force us to do, manipulate us to do. Why is it that one politician can make a pitstop in lahore and karachi, attend weddings and birthdays at the top politician of pakistan's place and its still ok? And players cant play cricket? Aren't the soldiers more hurt by the head of India drinking tea with the 'so called enemy', rather than a virat kohli shaking hands shoaib malik?

 

You decide!

no there is a monetary angle to it. Modi drinking tea is diplomacy helps us save Indian fishermen in pak for instance and vice versa. Not playing cricket is a coercive tool.  what is happening now is a carefully calibrated approach 

Posted
4 hours ago, Forever Indian said:

Why is Pakistan playing India in ICC events then? They should just back out since India don't play with them in bilaterals. Anyways India is getting the free points in ICC events from Pakistan, so why bother playing?

i dont understand why its so difficult. its simple India does not play bilaterals so that Pak does not get benefits. India plays them in ICC tournaments so that they can advance. Simple.

Posted
5 hours ago, Asim said:

We hear 365*24*7 borders, Pakistan,Terrorism, dushman, war, ban, Boycott blah blah...

 

and suddenly whole of india puts all of above factors on 'pause' and gets ready for Pak vs Ind; one of the "most exciting" game...

 

all the logics we get from ind are i. we will not play Only in bilateral bcz to damage Pak $$ ii. we will play in ICC bcz we can't give Pak 2 points... so the fact is Value of ALL of Above factors which u make 24*7 speeches about < 2 points of ICC

 

we don't get this conditional and situational "ghairat"...

we dont give a *.

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Cricketics said:

But what about jawans being sad that india is playing pak when they are fighting on border . I hate that excuse when people bring that up. 

Even jawans would enjoy playing Pakistan in ICC trophy. We routinely own them in those. :woot:

 

Edited by Pollack
Posted

P.S.  Notice how phateechar commentator changes his stance from "he is very competitive" to "you fool! What did you do!?" on that gesture. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...